Jamaican Rum JMM Thompson Bros and Bar Tre

Jamaican Rum JMM Thompson Bros and Bar Tre rum review by the fat rum pirateJamaican Rum JMM Thompson Bros and Bar Tre. Here we have another bottling from a Scottish Independent Bottler in the form of the Thompson Bros. For this release they have collaborated with Japanese bar “Bar Tre” in Hiroshima.

As well as independent bottlings of whisky, rum and other quality spirits, the Thompson Bros are also behind the Dornoch Distillery.

They (Simon and Phil) established the Dornoch Distillery and IB business following a successful stint, running a whisky bar in the Dornoch Castle Hotel. Which is also the venue for the distillery. Further information can be found here and here.

I’ve already reviewed 2 Jamaican rum releases from Thompson Bros in the shape of a Clarendon and a Worthy Park. Both of which were very good.

To be honest I know very little about Bar Tre but Japan is famous for its own (well sometimes its own) whisky and there is a huge market for Scotch Whisky in Japan. The distinctive artwork on this bottle has been provided by Yu Kurahashi, who is an artist with links to Bar Tre.

The design on this bottle is quite a departure from the previous Thompson Bros bottlings, I have reviewed. Much more rustic and more “home made”. That said its very striking and looks a lot better, than it might sound if you tried explaining the label to someone. Jamaican Rum JMM Thompson Bros and Bar Tre, comes in a standard bar style bottle with a slightly bulbous neck and a cork stopper to seal the rum.

Now I’m not sure if Bar Tre are getting an allocation to stock/sell but this is a single cask rum. The Rum was distilled in 1997 at Monymusk Distillery hence the J(amaica) M(ony)M(usk) marque. I assume this is the case, as I can find no official JMM marque noted for Monymusk. So its likely just a marque that possibly the importer has put on the barrel as an identifier. I know a lot of you out there know a lot more about this kind of thing than me. It’s not really my “thing”.

It has been bottled at 48.1% ABV and has an outturn of just 247 bottles from a Single Barrel. It has been aged for 23 years until 2020 and is non-chill filtered and natural colour. The whisky people love stating things are non-chill filtered.Jamaican Rum JMM Thompson Bros and Bar Tre rum review by the fat rum pirate

In the UK you can currently buy a bottle direct from Thompson Bros here, it is priced at £137.50. This is 100% Pot Still Jamaica Rum.

Well I think that is as much as needs saying about this rum. So I may as well pour myself a glass.

In the glass we have a light brown/straw coloured spirit. The nose is quite fruity – lots of pineapple, banana and a touch of passion fruit. It has a slightly fermented note to it with some traces of cider and malt vinegar.

There are traces of nail varnish, petrol and a smattering of oak and just a touch creosote. Yet despite this heaver, less desirable sounding (believe me they are very desirable!) notes it’s still quite light and fruity. It has a nice balance of Pot Still menace but it doesn’t go completely batshit mental like some of the really high ester Long Pond or Hampden rums.

Further nosing reveals some white wine, red grapes and a touch of brine.

Sipping Jamaican Rum JMM Thompson Bros and Bar Tre you get much more of a feel of the long ageing involved. Even though this rum has likely spent the majority of its time maturing in a continental climate it has still taken on a lot of character from the dynamic of the barrel ageing.

It’s definitely much woodier and oakier than the nose suggested. It’s quite tannic and I’m not getting more notes of tobacco, pipe smoke and some dark chocolate. Especially on the mid palate and finish.

The sweeter notes do however return after a couple of sips. Possibly as the palate re-calibrates. In particularly on the entry I’m not getting some citric lime juice and again the slightly fermented pineapple note. There’s a also a kind of baked banana and treacle like note mingling with the oak and spice on the mid palate.

Finish wise it’s pretty long and quite interesting. The sub 50% ABV also makes thisJamaican Rum JMM Thompson Bros and Bar Tre rum review by the fat rum pirate dangerously drinkable. That said there is no need to be “knocking this back like a pirate” the finish is slightly smoky and musty but has a nice hit of dark chocolate, tobacco and banana. It fades out gently but is a more than reasonable length.

I’m not always too impressed with Monymusk. Especially their own brand bottlings but this is a very nice rum. It’s not a huge funk bomb of a rum but it’s more approachable than a lot. It has aspects to it that remind me of Appleton 12 and at the same time something funkier like a low ester Hampden.

Really interesting and another great pick from Thompson Bros.

 

Similar Posts

  • English Harbour Aged 5 Years Antigua Rum

    English Harbour 5 Rumvent Review by the fat rum pirateEnglish Harbour is a rum which I had been looking at for some time.  For whatever reasons I had resisted the temptation to buy a bottle online.  I was presently surprised to find Newcastle (Upon Tyne) department store Fenwick’s had it in stock.  There is something satisfying about actually being able to have the experience of being able to buy a half decent bottle of rum over the counter.  Whilst the rum was slightly more expensive than online (£27.50) this was tempered by the ability to have the rum instantly (even though its taken nearly 3 weeks to try it!) and the fact no P&P charges.

    English Harbour is actually the name of a port/town on Antigua, West Indies.  Rum is as closely associated with England as it is the Caribbean so this is also quite a good marketing ploy.  I’m sure many a proud Englishman has bought this rum on name alone.  The rear of the bottle gives some details on the legend and heritage of this rum.

    The rum is presented in a traditional stubby style bottle.  Similar to those used by Doorly’s and Chairmans Reserve brands.  However, the English Harbour is in a dark green bottle.  As a result there is no way of telling how dark the rum is until poured.  The presentation is quite nice, the labels have a jagged aged age to them and overall it is pretty good albeit a little on the boring side.  It looks almost antique like.  I can’t imagine this rum appealing to younger drinkers, at least not by appearance.  The presentation redeems itself a little as the closure is a plastic topped real cork.  Its always satisfying to pop the cork on a bottle of rum and smell the aroma’s within and on the cork.

    I have a number of rums in my collection and have tried many more.  Very few I haveEnglish Harbour Rum found to have the ACR (Authentic Caribbean Rum) mark.  From memory I can only really think of Chairmans Reserve displaying this.  I’m pretty sure though that a few more of my Bajan, St Lucian and Jamaican rums probably do satisfy the criteria for ACR.  For those who are not in the know the ACR mark means the rum has been produced in a traditional manner.   The only additives permitted are caramel but this must only be for colouring it must not impart flavour to the rum. NB I have since writing this review conducted Hydrometer Tests on this rum which reveals added sugar – which makes me wonder quite what the ACR is achieiving.

    When finally poured the English Harbour is a deep mahogany.  It looks warm and inviting.  The nose is quite subtle, despite being a relatively young rum their isn’t much of an alcohol smell in a sense it doesn’t smell “boozy” or harsh like some young rums can.  The nose is sweet molasses, a little orange its smell is almost as sweet as some of the South and Central American premium sipping rums.

    From the nose I could be mistaken for thinking I have a £40 plus sipping rum.  When sipped the rum is a lot smoother than a rum this age has any right to be.  We aren’t talking ridiculously smooth as in Angostura 1919 but it is definitely a rum which can be sipped.  There is a little burn and a kick when swallowed but it isn’t rough or unpleasant.  It .actually pays to sip this in very small sips and to allow it time on the tongue.  When sipped like this you taste molasses and toffee.  The oakiness of the rum also comes through giving a slightly bitter taste.  When sipped you do get a tiny hint of fruit, a little citrus.

    English Harbour RumAs a cheap sipper English Harbour is certainly less rough and ready than many of the rums I have tried in this price range.  An ice cube also improves things as it takes some of the heat out of the rum allowing a little more flavour to come through in the mix.  Personally if I was looking for a sipping experience and enjoyed this unadulterated style of rum I would spend a few pounds more and go for either R Seale’s 10 Year Old or his Rum Sixty Six.  Cockspur 12 would also be a good shout at around the £30-35 price point.  Maybe even Chairman’s Reserve The Forgotten Casks.

    As usually concludes my tasting I tried the rum with my usual cola.  Even when mixed with only a little cola English Harbour is still very smooth.  Only a tiny amount of cola seems to take away the moderate burn experienced when sipped.  The rum actually seems to take some of the fizz out of the cola making the overall drink very smooth, perhaps too smooth.  The English Harbour is quite oaky and bitter, in the background you get a little banana and orange peel. Once the bitterness subsides there is a hint of coconut  and ginger.

    I’ve compared this rum both to premium Central/South American rums and Bajan/Central Caribbean “traditional” (excluding Jamaican) styles.  It’s a pretty complex rum there is quite a lot going on.  My initial thoughts are that it isn’t as good as Chairmans Reserve (sorry!!!!!) for rum and cola.  Personally I miss some of the rough and readiness of Chairmans and it isn’t quite as fruity.  As a sipper it is better than anything else in the £20-25 mark (that doesn’t say much) but it isn’t a really satisfying sipping rum.  For me this rum is kind of stuck between a rock and a hard place.  A kind of Jack of all trades master of none.

    This isn’t a bad rum by any stretch of the imagination but it isn’t anything to write home about either.

    2 stars

     

     

     

     

  • When is Rum not a Rum?

    10 Essential Bottles of RumRecently there was a debate at Tales of the Cocktail.  The debate centered around “When is rum not a rum?”.

    Basically it was a discussion between those who add sugar (and/or other additives) and those who are very much against the practice.  This got me thinking about a subject which is very close to my heart.

    The overall standard and practices used by professional and non-professional spirits writers.

    Reasons for “Blogging”

    When I set up this blog back in 2014 I did it for a few reasons.

    My first reason was a way of documenting and remembering my experiences with rum.  It would be for my own enjoyment and reflection in years to come.  It was a way of keeping those bottles of rums safe somewhere.  Without actually physically having to keep them all.  Much to my wife’s relief.

    My second reason was the lack of regularly updated or dedicated Rum Review websites.  Compared to Whisky – Rum really does have very little presence on the net.  I felt that if I produced a website, it would actually get looked at.  Rather than become one of many thousands that are largely ignored in the Whisky world.

    My third and final reason was linked to my second reason.  I felt as a consumer first and foremost, some of the advice and guidance being handed out on some of these websites was questionable.  That is being kind.  I also noticed a lot of positive reviews and very few negative ones.

    One of the first things I noticed about the Rum Community when I “joined up” and published the site back in 2014, was the friendliness.  A number of other bloggers were keen to welcome me.  The mantra “rum is fun” was very much in place.

    This may not seem a bad thing and in many ways it’s not.  Unfortunately it is this very mantra which continues to drag the category down.  It is partly why rum continues to be a bit of a joke in the spirits world.  It’s a party mixer to get drunk with.  With everyone being friendly and welcoming it seemed no questions were being asked.  On any level.  No one seemed to want to rock the boat.

    The Rum world suffers, as most spirits do from global multi nationals marketing and pricing strategies.  These multi nationals can pay to enter all manner of competitions (even set some up theselves).  Then market their rums quite freely as Gold Medal winning rum etc.  Some brands have become so intrinsically linked to certain Rumfests that it is difficult to take the awards seriously.  They can also demand premium shelf space in stores and even prevent competitors rums from being sold or displayed in stores or bars.

    Angostura 5 Year Old Rum Review by the fat rum pirateIndustry Samples

    These companies are also free to give out samples to the industry.  Now bloggers receiving samples and their impartiality is a private matter.  I personally don’t think it is possible to be 100% impartial.  Others have suggested they can.  What is clear though once you start scratching beneath the surface of all these reviews, is how bad some of the sample led ones are.

    Take for example Papa’s Pilar Dark 24.  I slammed this as it has little resemblance to rum. Run a quick google search and it will draw up a whole host of positive reviews.  Read and compare the notes.  Ask yourself – how many of these “experts” are really knowledgeable about rum?

    Which may sound rather big-headed of me.  Who the hell am I to be calling out bad reviews? Well, I don’t even believe I am calling out bad reviews.  I’m calling out marketing.  A lot of these so called reviews are not reviews.  The reviewer hasn’t spent much time with their promotional bottle.  They’ve been given some marketing blurb to re-gurgitate and they have set about their task.  Most of the time they don’t even score the rum. They just give a whole host of nice sounding tasting notes.  Which to be fair you could easily do with most rum – good or bad.

    The practice stinks and the average consumer deserves a lot better than to be duped by such nonsense.

    Hydrometer Tests

    Despite the very real situation back in 2014 that rum was being altered and adulterated very few website owners acknowledged the fact.  Even fewer had adopted the Hydrometer Test Method, as advocated by Johnny Drejer of Drecon.dk.

    imagePersonally, once I realised how simple and inexpensive these tests were it struck me as a no brainer to test all the rums I reviewed.  Why? Because you can never know enough about rum and you will rarely be told by the industry.

    It makes sense to me to understand as much about the spirit of rum as possible.  Granted the Hydrometer Tests do not tell everything but they do offer an invaluable insight.

    Now some had spoke out about his adulteration.  Perhaps the most (in)famous of these is Capn Jimbo of the Rum Project.  Unfortunately the Capn was overzealous and rather repetitive in his criticisms of the practice.  Rather than influence or engage he basically just pissed a lot of people off.  He did and continues to make a lot of very good points.  Unfortunately he has influenced too few people.  In many respects he has probably caused more people to dig their heels in against his opinions.

    As I write, now in 2016 more Rum Reviewers are commenting on added sugar and conducting Hydrometer Tests on their collections.  However, a lot remain very quiet on the subject.

    So you might well still be wondering “When is rum not a rum?”.  Well it’s certainly a very difficult and contentious question.

    From my viewpoint. I am someone who wants to help people make good choices when buying rum. So perhaps to answer the question of “When is rum not a rum?” we need to approach it from a slightly different angle.

    What is Good Rum?

    The Real McCoy 12 year old rum review by the fat rum pirateRum is a distillate derived from sugar cane or sugar cane juice.  It is distilled in either pot or column stills.  To remain a rum it should not be distilled to the point whereby it becomes ethyl alcohol or neutral spirit.  Typically this is at around 95% but many have suggested it should be lower to maintain the character of the spirit – around 85% maximum.

    Once the rum comes off the still it should be aged in good quality, empty (not unwashed) oak barrels.  It can be matured in a variety of barrels and a “finish” can be applied – again in barrels which do not contain other spirits or alcohols.

    Once aged for the necessary period deemed by the distiller the rum should be bottled and/or blended with other rum.

    If you have distilled and aged the rum in this manner you will have a good quality spirit called Rum.

    It really should be that simple.  Any flavour beyond the original distillate will be provided by the maturation period in the oak. Simple.

    If you are reviewing rum then you should be able to identify rum which has been produced in this way.  You should be familiar with the “true spirit” you are writing about.  You should over time be able to identify tastes, flavours and smells that have perhaps been added.  This is the very tricky part.

    Benchmarks

    I always use benchmarks of good rums for the majority of  rum styles.  These might not necessarily be the best rum in the style but they are all of a certain standard.  They represent a spirit which is at the very least “good”.

    For Jamaican and Bajan rum this has proved a very uncomplicated choice.  Pretty much anything from Appleton Estate and Foursquare are good starters.  For more “funky” Jamaican rums then J Wray and Nephews White Overproof offers a good example of that “niche”.  At the same time Hampden Gold or Smith & Cross offer  an introduction to high ester Jamaican rum.

    For Bajan rum I can also call upon Mount Gay Extra Old and Cockspur Fine Rum as solid examples of the style.  One a sipper one an inexpensive mixer.

    For Navy Rum it’s fairly straightforward and all must be judged against the standards set by Pusser’s Gunpowder proof (54.5% ABV).

    As examples of white rum I use Don Q Cristal, Charman’s Reserve White Label and Appleton White.

    Unfortunately due to the amount of adulteration and unspoken of practices in rum it gets rather tricky after this.

    El Dorado 15 Year Old Special Reserve Rum by the fat rum pirate reviewDemerara Rum – It’s quite difficult to get unsweetened Demerara especially at the lower mixing end of things.  As a result my standards for Demerara include both sweetened and unsweetened.  El Dorado 8 and 15 for sweetened rums.  Woods Navy Rum (it is purely Demerara despite being sold as Navy rum) and Cadenheads Classic Rum for the unsweetened rums.  If I am reviewing an expensive Demerara around the £100 mark for example then Velier’s rums will set the benchmark.

    Cuban/Spanish Style Rum – I tend to use Havana Club 7 and Seleccion de Maestro as benchmarks for this style.

    Premium Rum – I use Premium rum as an example of a style but in reality it is more adultered rum than anything else.  I’m not keen on this “style” of rum.  Ron Zacapa and Diplomatico Reserva Exclusiva are examples of this style.  It’s difficult really to see these kinds of spirit as rum.

    As you can see it does get difficult and confusing.  I can’t even go into every style of rum as I would be on all day!  It’s bit of minefield really.

    Will I downscore a rum solely based on added sugar (or other suspected additives?

    My answer is that I won’t mark the rum down solely because it has added sugar.  However if the added sugar detracts from what would have been the original spirit in a negative way.  The best example I can think of is Plantation Jamaica 2001.  In that the original taste, flavour and texture of the distillate has been lost – then yes, I will down score it.

    Likewise if a rum is obscured so much by added sugar and additives that it displays no or little resemblance to rum – it won’t score well as a rum.  I’m reviewing rum not liqueurs.

    Ron ZacapaWhich brings me round to my final point.  I mentioned already that when reviewing rum you can never know enough about the spirit.  Knowledge of the spirit of rum and how it should taste is key.  It’s vital to understand and at least try to determine when a rum has been adulterated.

    It Tastes Nice…..

    In my opinion it is simply not acceptable to review rum based solely on something tasting nice.  To many this may sound a little strange.  Surely reviewers should review based on how they enjoy the rum?

    I would say yes undoubtedly reviewers should base their opinions on how much they enjoy the rum.  If however they cannot taste or determine any rum in the bottle then they should make this abundantly clear.  As mentioned already rum is a very diverse spirit.  Some of this diversity is due to production methods, climate, ageing, blending etc and some of this diversity is due to additives to the base spirit.  If these additives detract from the original base spirit – it should be noted.

    This is a very tricky area for a rum reviewer.  I will state now that I cannot 100% vouch that I could identify every rum which has been altered.  I doubt I could even vouch 90%.  However, what I am trying to do is learn and understand the true spirit of rum.  I can’t test for additives such as glycerine but I am learning how it feels in the mouth.

    What I can do however is recognise what should be present in certain rums.  If a rum has been aged for any prolonged period then it should exhibit some oak, particularly on the nose.  It then comes down to understanding the various styles a Jamaican rum should be more punchy and funky – big notes of bruised banana and other overripe fruits.

    A Bajan rum when done well should be nicely balanced with vanilla and gentle oaked notes.  Rums of a Spanish origin (Cuban rums for example) should be lighter more delicate with often a tobacco’ed note.  Unfortunately many Spanish style rums do have wine/vermouth etc added to them.  Cuban rum by law is permitted to have 20 g/L of sugar added.  Which again makes things more difficult.  No one ever said it was easy.

    If rum continues to be heralded because it is sweet and tastes nice – step forward Diplomatico Reserva Exclusiva, Ron Zacapa, Pyrat XO and Ron Millonario XO then the category will not move forward.

    Holsten Pils Dennis LearyThe whole “smooth and sweet” basis of reviewing rum needs to stop.  Rum is not sweet because it is distilled from sugar cane.  It is exactly the same as any other spirit.  The sugar turns to alcohol.  Didn’t anyone pay attention to Dennis Leary’s 1990’s Holsten Pils adverts?

    If a rum is smooth and sweet – then I want to know why.  Rum can be sweet.  When finishes are applied to rum – in the case of Foursquare’s Port Cask Finish.  It can also be relatively smooth.  However you are drinking (at least) 37.5% ABV liquor – if it doesn’t give you at least a little kick – there’s something up.

    Ron Millonario XO for example is not a smooth and sweet rum.  It is a sweetened and highly doctored “rum”.  The rum in this product is non-existent.  It’s been masked beyond all recognition.

    Any reviewer worth their salt should recognise this.  Unfortunately many either cannot or more worryingly choose not to.  I do not have anywhere near as much knowledge as I would like but I will continue to seek out information and improve, wherever possible.

  • Santa Teresa Anejo Gran Reserva

    Santa Teresa Anejo Gran Reserva Rum review by the fat rum pirateSanta Teresa Anejo Gran Reserva. The Santa Teresa brand hails from Venezuela. The Hacienda Santa Teresa is situated in the valleys of Aragua near the capital Caracas. The estate was founded way back in 1796.

    Indeed, Santa Teresa’s flagship rum is name after the year the estate was founded. Santa Teresa 1796 is one of the mostly widely recognised “Premium” rums the world over. Bacardi took over distribution of that rum, but not the rest of the Santa Teresa line up in December 2016. This has enabled Santa Teresa 1796 to become available more widely, particularly in Travel Retail Duty Free.

    I have previously reviewed both the 1796 and the Linaje rums from Santa Teresa.

    Hacienda Santa Teresa grow and harvest their own estate sugar cane. Once the juice is extracted, the remaining molasses is used to produce Santa Teresa rum. The molasses is then fermented for 12-16 hours. The resulting wash of around 8% ABV is then distilled on either a Continuous Column Still or a Copper Pot Still.

    Two different cuts of alcohol are taken from the Continuous Column still. From the fourth column a light, pretty much neutral spirit is taken at 95% and from the first column a oilier, more flavourful spirit  at 75% ABV. These two cuts form the base of every rum Santa Teresa produce.

    From what I can see the Pot Still at Santa Teresa is only used for the 1796 and the Bi-Centennial Blend, they bottled a few years back. There is nothing which indicates that any Pot Still rum is contained in this bottle.

    It has also been noted that all Santa Teresa rums are aged in ex-bourbon and I understand that Santa Teresa Anejo Gran Reserva is aged up to 5 years. The minimal amount of ageing required under the Venezuelan DOC Denominación de Origen is 2 years to call the spirit a rum. Although Santa Teresa operate a “solera system” (which is perhaps more genuine than some) I do not think the solera is used for this expression. It is far more likely just a blend of different barrels of different ages.

    Santa Teresa Anejo Gran Reserva is particularly popular in mainland Spain and its islands, where it is in pretty much every liquor store and bar. Especially in tourist areas such as Benidorm, Mallorca and Salou (in my experience). In the UK a 70cl bottle will set you back around £22-26. It iSanta Teresa Anejo Gran Reserva Rum review by the fat rum pirates bottled at a respectable if unremarkable 40% ABV.

    Presentation wise it has a unique contoured bar style bottle. Label information is minimal and isn’t translated into English. So it’s not terribly useful to me. When pouring, as is the case with many rums and spirits from South/Central America it has plastic diffuser. This is to prevent the refilling of the bottle with a cheaper spirit by nefarious bar owners. The label has been updated and re-jigged a fair few times over the past few years. It’s likely you will find a few variations for sale especially in bricks and mortar stores.

    So let’s move on and see how Santa Teresa Anejo Gran Reserva goes down.

    In the glass we have light golden brown spirit. The nose is light with lots of vanilla. There is a note of tobacco and some toffee. Warming woody spices float over the top and they are nicely integrated and balanced.

    It’s not a hugely complex nose. Nor is it particularly “big”. It’s a light gentle rum which isn’t trying to be anything it’s not. It smells like a fairly simple and straightforward mixing rum. As seems to be a theme, the rum registers 8g/L of additives. These are probably softening the spirit a little to reduce the burn and astringency of the younger rums in the blend.

    Sipped it is best described as light, slightly boozy, woody, tobacco water. Which doesn’t sound all that appealing and to be fair in terms of a sipper, it’s not particularly good. It’s just too light and lacks in any real flavour. There is nothing really to distinguish this from many other similar “rons” at this price point.

    It is though marketed and priced as a mixer. To expect a Premium Sipping experience at £22-25 is a big ask.Santa Teresa Anejo Gran Reserva Rum review by the fat rum pirate

    It’s popular with cola, I drink quite a lot of this type of rum when I am on holiday. It’s usually readily available in most bars and in the supermarket you usually get rums like these for less than €15.

    Santa Teresa Anejo Gran Reserva does seem less sweet than some other “rons” and has a bit more of a tobacco, smoke and woody profile. I don’t mind this as a mixer at all to be honest. If the price is right. It’s the kind of rum for long lazy days on the beach or in the garden.

    That said though, this is in the grand scheme of things pretty average. Well maybe a touch above. So we’ll give it an extra 1/2 star. Not a rum I would go out of my way to find but if it was more readily available and less than £20 I’d buy the odd bottle for weekend mixing.

  • Don Papa No.7 Small Batch Rum

    Don Papa No.7 Rum Review by the fat rum pirateDon Papa No.7 Small Batch Rum. This is how the Bleeding Heart Company who produce Don Papa are marketing this version of their very popular Don Papa Rum. This is the original Don Papa which was released back in 2012. Don Papa No.7 has proved to be a very controversial and divisive rum ever since.

    It hails from Sugarlandia (I kid you not), Phillipines and Don Papa is a tribute to Papa Isio. His legend was instrumental to the independence of the island during the Revolution of the 1890s. The figure of Don Papa on the bottle is inspired by Papa Isio.

    Don Papa No.7 is marketed as a Small Batch Premium rum made from the finest sugar cane. Even though it is produced on a Multi Column Still. It has been aged for 7 years in small oak barrels. You will find Don Papa in most online stores (one French rum stockist has famously refused to carry it at all) at around £32 for a 70cl bottle. It is bottled at 40% ABV. Marks & Spencer stock it though they note it in their stores as being a Spiced Rum. Which is very interesting

    So why is Don Papa No.7  so controversial and why are some stockists refusing to sell this rum? Why are M&S selling it as Spiced Rum, if it is Small Batch Premium Rum?

    19 g/L of additives as per the Hydrometer Tests and paid laboratory tests have shown 2.4 grams per/liter of glycerin and 359 milligrams per/liter of vanillin. There is also information out there to suggest that the rum also has a mixture of sweet fruit flavourings added to it as well. So lets see how this one tastes……

    In the glass Don Papa 7 Year Old is a classic golden brown with an orange and red hue. It’s glistening and inviting.

    On the nose Don Papa 7 Year Old delivers huge wafts of cheap Cream Soda. It smells a lot like a vanilla and lemonade ice cream float. Only with a bag of sugar added just to make sure its plenty sweet enough.Don Papa No.7 Rum Review by the fat rum pirate

    Artificially cloyingly sweet Cherries – like Maraschino cherries steeped in cheap sherry or despicable 4 Euro Spanish Brandy. Don Papa 7 Year Old smells quite similar to A.H Riise’s Navy Rum only (believe it or not) even sweeter and more cloying.

    A small child would like the smell of this particular drink. It smells like the inside of a traditional sweet shop. Sherbet, artificial sweeteners, liquid candy. Rum you say? Not on this nose.

    It would be easier to say what isn’t on the nose. Well first of all there is vanilla – but its artificially saccharin sweet vanilla, not anything to do with oak ageing. Which is also lacking in any kind of presence. No sense of ageing with this particular concoction. Nor is there any kind of alcohol note. It’s so ridiculously sweetened that you don’t get any notes that are rum or even alcohol like. There is perhaps a hint of some spice there but whether is it natural or artificially added is debatable.

    If this was a Spiced Rum or rather if it were widely labelled as one – I wouldn’t have such an issue with it. Unfortunately, shit like this and Bumbu are giving people the entirely wrong impression about rum. The idea that anyone that enjoys this kind of sweetened garbage is going to move on and drink “pure” rum as some kind of gateway is laughable. They’ll stick drinking this bollocks 99.9% of the time. Real rum or pure rum will be too “rough” for them. I’ve seen plenty evidence of this at Rum Festivals and sadly from looking at Rumratings.com.

    I really don’t want to but I’ll take a sip. It surely cannot be as bad as the simply revolting nose.

    Wrong – its absolutely rotten. Cloyingly sweet with a disgusting overnote of saccharin and fake sweeteners. Aspartame attack – along with vanilla essence and god knows what other rubbish they have added into this. They talk of ageing this in various casks – which seems unlikely and frankly there is no point ageing the “rum”. Is there seriously a rum at the base of this confected shit show? It must be rotten if there is, as I can see no other reason you would pour so much sugary syrup into a rum that was even half decent.

    For all its sweet sugariness, its really very drying and bitter on the palate once it all settles down. It’s just a gloopy overly syruped mess. It bears no resemblance to any rum that has ever graced the Caribbean. I would love to see the equivalent shit like this try and masquerade as Scotch Whisky in the Whisky world. It would be shot down in flames in minutes of release. Not so with rum – with so many “expert spirit” writers out there you can find any number of misinformed freebie reviews out there saying how great this is. Which is perhaps part of the bigger problem.

    As other RDon Papa No.7 Rum Review by the fat rum pirateum focused reviewers have rightly pointed out this is fake rum – I would even question if legally it should be available as “Rum” in the EU. Some retailers have taken to listing this as Spiced Rum. Maybe enforcement of the EU directives would see this re-labelled but don’t hold your breath on that.

    Hideous muck, even when mixed it competes with whatever you try mixing it with. Giving its sickly sugary fake cherry and vanilla note to any drink you are trying to make.

    Don Papa No.7 is best avoided and sadly Sainsburys have recently started stocking it.

    Criminal.

     

  • J Gow Revenge Aged 3 Years

    J Gow Revenge Aged 3 Years Rum Review by the fat rum pirateJ Gow Revenge Aged 3 Years. This is the third aged release from VS Distillers, who are based in the Orkney Islands, just off the North East coast of Bonny Scotland. VS Distillers refers to the man behind J Gow Rum Collin Van Schayk. Clever eh?

    I’ve previously reviewed Fading Light and Hidden Depths (Vol 1) so if you are unfamiliar with VS Distillers, you might want to read up on those expressions as well. J Gow also produce a Spiced Rum, which I have yet to review.

    So what do we have in this particular bottlings?

    Much like the previous aged bottlings from J Gow, there is a good deal of information on the back label of the bottle. Which is great for lazy reviewers like myself. It is also great for the average consumer, who can learn more about the actual contents of this rum.

    J Gow Revenge Aged 3 Years is Scottish Pure Single Rum. it is 100% Pot Still rum. The rum has been aged for 3 years in a combination of ex-bourbon and virgin oak casks. It is a blend of J Gow’s HD (Heavy Dunder) and DS, which is J Gow’s standard rum which has been has had an extra stripping rum to make it a bit stronger. The ageing has taken place on Orkney.

    The rum is named after the infamous Orkney pirate John Gow’s ship The Revenge which he acquire when he instigated onboard the ship, when it was originally named5 the Caroline. He soon acquire a further 6 cannons for the ship and it began its new life as a pirate vessel.

    J Gow Revenge is available via the mailing list from today and will be on general sale on Wednesday (21/04/2021). It retails at £38.99 and is bottled at 43% ABV. Around 2,000 bottles of this rum will be available. My bottle is noted as Batch #1. 2018. NB J Gow Revenge is now available from The Whisky Exchange at £39.50.

    Presentation wise Collin is quite an artistic guy so he has designed (and hand labelled) all the bottles for this release. As he has with all the other J Gow products. The front label unsurprisingly, shows a pirate ship on the high seas. The rear label gives some information on the rum in the bottle and a bit of folklore regarding John Gow.

    I really like the 3/4 stubby style bottle and the bottle is sealed with a chunky wooden topped cork stopper. The label over the top of the enclosure reads Pure Island Rum Inspired by Pirates and Distilled Beside The Sea…..

    J Gow Revenge Aged 3 Years Rum Review by the fat rum pirateI think I’ve covered pretty much everything now so we may as well get on with the fun part and see what this “Scottish Rum” has to offer.

    In the glass we have a gold coloured rum a shade or two away from a straw colour. It looks a touch darker in the bottle than the glass. There are no signs of any caramel colouring here and the hydrometer does conclude there is no additives present. Which is always  a good start.

    The nose, as you should really find with rum matured here in a colder climate, even when aged is full of rich molasses notes. Strong aroma’s of toffee and caramel feel your nostrils. Beneath the sweetness is a touch of “menace” something just a bit boozy but very pleasant nonetheless. This does smell a bit like a rum pirates might have drank.

    The sweetness is carried a along with some nice notes of vanilla and some very vibrant woody notes which are fresh and full of rich spices – clove, a touch of cinnamon and some warming oak spice.

    Hints of pair and some apricot come into the mix as well. It has a really nice balance to it and actually noses more maturely than its 3 years might suggest.

    Taking a sip it is initially quite spicy with lots of oak and some peppery heat. However, it is only the initial couple of sips that present the rum this way. It quickly settles down to a lighter easier going sipper.

    It’s reasonably sweet but there is a bitterness to the molasses and some of barrel influence certainly leads it down a slightly more savoury/whisky-esque note. That said it is much in keeping with Fading Light rather than Hidden Depths Vol 1.

    The mid palate builds slowly with nods towards bourbon. The vanilla fades as the woodier notes take over. The molasses fades and is replaced with a spicier bite but not a fiery chilli like note. It’s still nicely balanced and very pleasant. Theres a hint of a perfumed note as it moves towards the finish.

    At 43% ABV it retains plenty of its bite but it still works as a very easy sipper. It goes down perhaps a little too well………

    The finish fades out nicely and is a decent length. It leaves a spicy note on the tongue and it becomes very moreish. It very much leaves you wanting another glass I am finding.

    J Gow Revenge Aged 3 Years Rum Review by the fat rum pirateIt’s interesting to note the progression as unlike the Fading Light, the molasses notes aren’t as dominant. Sure they are there but they are tempered and balanced more by the barrel influence. Very nicely balanced.

    The rum has a crispness to it that I can’t quite explain. It’s got no real rough edges aside from the little hint of booze (which I really like in my rum), right at the start of the sip and on the nose.

    This is the best rum, I think so far from J Gow/VS Distillers. Which is no bad thing as the other two rums I’ve tried weren’t too shabby either.

    Get yourself on that mailing list. Also get yourself some of that tablet in the photos. It’s bloody lovely.

     

     

     

     

     

  • Bacardi Anejo

    Bacardi Anejo Rum Review by the fat rum pirateBacardi Anejo. Aside from the usual Bacardi bottles you find in the Supermarket and Duty Free a trip to the continent (and further a field) can often throw up a few more variations from the Puerto Rican rum powerhouses.

    I picked up this bottle of Bacardi Anejo in May 2019 on holiday in Salou. I think the 1 litre bottle was around €15. I’d not seen this particular expression before. I could tell from the presentation (and the dustiness) of the bottle that it was not a “new” release.

    Bacardi re-designed their logo around 2015 so this is definitely before then. Such is the volume of Bacardi’s output you see releases still available for years after they are discontinued. Indeed Bacardi recently released a 4 year old Cuatro Anejo.

    I’ve looked around for some information on this rum and have been able to determine the following. As is noted on the rear of the bottle this is not a Puerto Rican rum. It was actually distilled a the first distillery Bacardi opened outside of Cuba way back in 1929. Destileria de Galarza in Mexico. The Spanish writing on the label suggests is was produced primarily for the Spanish speaking market. I cannot ever recall seeing this rum in the UK.

    It is produced from fermented molasses, distilled on multi column stills and is aged in ex-bourbon barrels, for up to 3 years. Some websites state it has rum aged up to 6 years old. It is bottled at 38% ABV.

    It is presented in what was the familiar Bacardi style of the nineties and for much of this century, until the recent re-branding. The opaque bottle hides the colour of the liquid it has a plastic screw cap and there is a diffuser in the neck of the bottle. To prevent “re-filling the bottle” with Bacardi Anejo Rum Review by the fat rum piratecheaper or inferior spirit.

    In glass we have a fairly light brown spriit. A shade or two darker than straw but not quite dark enough to refer to as golden brown.

    The nose is very light. It’s slightly “stony” and quite reminiscent of most Bacardi rums. It has a weird grainy, mineral like taste. This one however lacks some of the sweeter buttery notes that were found in the Anejo Cuatro or the Ocho released over the past couple of years.

    There is some light oak spices and some gentle alcohol notes. It’s quite weak on the nose but there is a fair amount of booze coming through. Young alcohol, nothing more really of note, unfortunately.

    Sipped, it just tastes like a watery version of the Anejo Cuatro. It’s light with a slight butteriness, theres a little integration of oak and a touch of light spices. Some shortbread and a touch of tobacco mingle alongside each other. Some light smoky notes.

    I’m using light too much but that is essentially what this is. Dialled down to 38% ABV it makes for a very watery and very light rum. There’s little to no body and it’s all just a bit meh. Well actually a lot meh.

    The initial sips greats you with Bacardi’s trademark sweet entry. It then mBacardi Anejo Rum Review by the fat rum pirateoves onto some ginger and some light notes of pepper. The finish is next to non-existant as the ginger and pepper are overtaken by a slight bitter tobacco note which quickly fades away. All of this is running alongside some rough sweet alcohol which is delivering most if not all the flavour. A good sipper it is not.

    And to be fair its probably not meant to be a sipper. So how do we see this one as a mixer? Shall we try it with cola?

    It’s pretty forgetful to be honest.  It reminds me very much of Bacardi Black, only I must admit its not quite as tobacco heavy as that monstrosity. This is just weaker and less flavourful. Again all I get is a bit of a sweet tobacco note and some booze.

    It’s all just so boring. Hang on a minute. Urgh there is a nasty almost artificial kind of aftertaste as well. Bitter nastiness.

    Best avoided even if it is pretty cheap.