Habitation Velier Foursquare 2013

Foursquare 2013 Pure Single rum Habitation Velier Rum review by the fat rum piratHabitation Velier Foursquare 2013.  No what other pairing in the rum world could you possibly think of that would be a virtual guarantee of a quality rum experience?

In amongst the sensation that was caused by the pairing of Velier and Foursquare with the 2006 release in 2016, where a number of bottlings released undeer the Habitation Velier moniker.

Habitation Velier’s tagline is “The House of Pure Single Rums”.  Recently when I have been reviewing Foursquare rums I have been struggling to think of anything new and interesting to say.  Not so with this release.

You want information straight from the horses mouth? Habitation Velier is the place to go. Just about every conceivable question you may have about the actual contents of the bottle are explained on either the bottle of the cardboard box which houses the rum.

Before I move onto those details I’ll give a bit of detail about the presentation.  First up we have a departure from the usual Velier bottles.  It is still opaque but it is more of a 3/4 flash style rather than a more traditional red wine style bottle.  The bottle is housed in a very solid cardboard box and you get a very nice cork stopper.  The presentation for the Habitation Velier Foursquare is great and immediately you realise that the production method is very important with these bottlings.

With the Habitation Velier Foursquare 2013 Luca and Richard want you to know and understand how the rum is produced.  The main picture is of a Double Retort Pot Still.

If you can still find a bottle of this rum in the UK then it will set you back around £75-85 for a 70cl bottle.  As so much information is available on the bottle and box I will run you through all that now………

Barbados Pure Single Rum – Very Rare Pot Still rum aged in ex-cognac casksFoursquare 2013 Pure Single rum Habitation Velier Rum review by the fat rum pirat

100% Pot Still Distillation

Distilled: 2013 Bottled : 2015 Aged : 2 yo

Aged in the Tropics/Angel Share 15%

Sugar Free, Natural Colour, Unchillfiltered, Barrel proof

64% vol.

This is a rum distilled entirely in the pot still built by Green Engineering and Forsyths.

Pure Single Rum = Run Distilled from a unique pot still

Pretty comprehensive I’m sure you will agree and it certainly makes my job a lot easier!

I think we have enough information on the rum now so we may as well start the fun part…..

In the glass despite the rum being only 2 years old it is a very vivid reddish/brown.  Bearing in mind all the information given regarding this rum I can only conclude that the colour is due to ageing in the cognac casks.

The nose is full and quite aggressive.  It has a fieryness to it.  Reminiscent in many ways of overproof Demerara rums such as Pussers or Lemon hart.  It’s big, rich, full and fruity.  Notes of dark dried fruits such as raisins and currants.  Vibrant red berries such as raspberries.  Running across all this is a rich caramel/toffee.  It really doesn’t have full on alcohol aromas that I might expect from such a young spirit at such a high proof.  Nor does it have any noticeable oak or spicy bourbon like notes.

Habitation Velier Foursquare 2013 rum review by the fat rum pirateWhat I am sensing here is something very different.  Over the past couple of years Richard Seale Master Distiller at Foursquare has been producing some of the best and most daring rums that the world has ever seen.  This is perhaps the most “out there” product to date..

Sipped at 61% is where you first realise that you are perhaps drinking a rum which has not been extensively aged.  It’s very spicy and you do get quite a lot of strong alcohol heat.  it’s a real mouth tingler.  Despite this you can still taste the fruity flavours that were promised on the nose.  There is a sweetness but there is also a very strong red wine note.  This is quite bitter but it also introduces for the first time some oaked notes.

A few drops of water are definitely recommended with this one.  Bringing the rum down to a more recognisable drinking strength certainly helps identify more of the complexities in this rum.

In many ways its very much a little brother to the Foursquare 2006.  It’s a very rich, very flavourful rum.  The age of the rum means it carries forward a lot of sweetness.  It has a really nice smokey finish which definitely leaves you wanting more.

I wouldn’t say it is as balanced as other offerings from Foursquare.  Not what I would term easy drinking.  It’s definitely not a light rum.  More a powerful flavour bomb of a rum which carries a lot of what I term as menace.  There is no mistaking you are drinking rum.  Rummy rum.

It’s very much in the vein of the Velier Demerara’s – rich, bold, tropically aged flavours that offer a burst of flavour which carries through to a very long and satisfying finish.  I’d be very interested to try this product at 5 or 8 years of age.

As with most of the HabiHabitation Velier Foursquare 2013 rum review by the fat rum piratetation Velier releases it is quite experimental and different even to your “normal” Foursquare.  It won’t be a rum for everyone.  Having said that this rum makes a fantastic rum and coke and could also be put to good use in cocktails.  It’s just a rather expensive way to make a cocktail.

I’ve really enjoyed this and I hope that these type of rums continue to be released.  I feel this has been slightly overlooked after all the hype over the 2006.  I would urge you to find a bottle as there are still plenty floating around especially in Europe.

 

Similar Posts

  • Rum Blogging – A Blogger’s Perspective

    Rum Blogging - A Blogger's Perspective Article by the fat rum pirateRum Blogging – A Blogger’s Perspective. Starting this blog was one of the most challenging, yet rewarding things I have done in my adult life. The first thing which became immediately apparent to me was that my general grammar and ability to actually write something, had slipped considerably. I had after all left Full Time Education some18 years prior. It is still far from perfect!

    Computers or rather computer software such as Word and Excel has left us lazy and overly reliant on things like spellcheck and formulae. These correct and calculate things as we go. For all of my adult life, I have worked as a Civil Servant. Which has involved sending out pre-written forms and letters. For good reason, most communications to the great British public are carefully vetted and approved before being allowed to be used.

    So, I have in many ways been able to get through adult life without really having to sit down and write anything of even a fair to medium level of complexity or length.

    I am aware of incorrect apostrophes, spelling mistakes, mis-used words and completely made up ones appearing on this blog. Likely in this article.

    Although, I may not be the biggest fan of the term, I am very much a Blogger rather than a writer. For me a writer would be someone qualified in some way, so they can use such a term. Whether that be through formal qualifications, such as being a journalist or maybe because they had something published and paid for doing so.

    If you look up the term “Blog” the following definition applies

    “a regularly updated website or web page, typically one run by an individual or small group, that is written in an informal or conversational style.

    My site is very definitely updated regularly and my style, warts and all, including all the things already mentioned is very informal! I also hope it has a conversational flow. One of my favourite bloggers is actually a vlogger called Ralfy Mitchell, who runs the very popular Whisky (and other quality spirits) review Youtube site Ralfy.com

    Ralfy is very knowledgeable and, by his own admission a whisky anorak. However, despite being very serious about his whisky he is entertaining, engaging, amusing and occasionally a bit ranty. He keeps you thoroughly engrossed throughout his videos.

    I have tried to keep the tone of my blog serious but not overtly so. I still try and keep a little bit of me in each review, much like Ralfy does. If this blog comes anywhere near being as influential as Ralfy’s I will consider myself to have done a job well done. I don’t think it is going to happen but I can still keep on trying.

    All this being said, I am not the best writer in the Rum World. There are numerous others who can but things far more eloquently than myself. People with a much better understanding and usage of the English language. I arguably could write a little better. I certainly could cut out some of the mistakes. The thing is it is not in my nature, unlike other reviewers to write notes in advance. Nor do I have numerous “sessions” with a rum trying to identify and verify all the tastes and sensations they have experienced.

    When I come to write a review it is very often done in one sitting. I usually take around an hour to go from a blank page to a review, complete with background research, photos (the one thing which is done in advance by my very supportive wife) and the nosing/tasting notes of the chosen rum. I have a quick scan through, bear in mind I’ve likely had a few glasses of said rum, to make sure it reads okay. It will then either be published immediately or a draft saved for a later date. I do usually re-read a draft prior to publishing it. Sometimes……

    I’m the type of person who spends quite a lot of time thinking about things, so when I come to write I usually have a pretty good idea already sketched out in my mind. I’m also impatient and like to get things “done”. I can’t stand people that piss about procrastinating over things. Nothing iriritates my more people who cannot make a decision and hum and ha and dilly dally.

    At the end of the day if one of my reviews is a bit shit, I’m sure people will be quick to tell me!

    Now as well as establishing that I am not the greatest writer in the world, I will also advise all potential bloggers on the other major pitfall in starting a blog. WordPress. Now WordPress is a great tool for self-publishing on the Internet. I am not sure how easy other blogging platforms such as Wix and Blogger are but WordPress has a pretty difficult learning curve.

    It is a lot more difficult to get a web site looking and behaving as you would like than you might imagine. You can lose days searching for the light “plug in” to send emails to your followers or hours upon hours trying to get a menu or table to go where you want it to go and behave as you wish. I can’t do any computer coding or anything like that. I see computers as functional tools designed to make my life easier. They can program themselves as far as I’m concerned. There is good reason why a lot of blogs do not change their layout or add much by way of new features during their life cycle. We aren’t all techies.

    Another thing about blogging, especially if you take like I have the earlier definition seriously is, you have to be constantly working on it. If you are looking to set up a blog because you think it will be great to receive free rum and free entry to Rum Events etc then be prepared to play the long game. In fact you are better off just forgetting about this as you should be focusing on writing a good blog and gaining a sizeable following. The rest will come if you put the work in.

    Now, some bloggers the aforementioned Ralfy is one such blogger who steadfastly refuse samples. Some do this to remain independent and impartial, such as Ralfy. Others feel that the 2,3 and 5cl samples routinely dished out by the “bigger” producers are not sufficient to base an opinion on. In the main though such bloggers are a rarity because it can get very tempting to take up offers of free rum.

    I did start off with a view to not accepting samples. This is quite an easy thing to do early on. Especially if like me for the first 9 months you “fly under the radar” and remain anonymous.

    Now, in and ideal world the best websites by the best bloggers/writers etc would be the most viewed and most popular. Unfortunately, as with nearly every form of the arts the “best” do not always rise to the top.

    Another thing to consider if you are thinking of becoming a blogger is how do you get your site viewed? I’ve learned a few things about how search engines work and how you can increase your ranking with search engines so more people visit your site. However, you have to use whatever means necessary to get views on your site for all this to kick in. Search Engine Optimisation is a great way to ensure your website gets viewed. In basic terms Search Engine Optimisation is a way of “making” the likes of Google rank your website “higher” in its page ranking than other sites based on keywords and phrases.

    In addition to this you can also use Google Analytics to help with the ranking. This enables google to check how popular your website is and this can also help with the page ranking. Basically if you can get your site on the first page of a google search under popular keywords and phrases you are onto a winner.

    Advertising is obviously a quick way to get hits depending on your budget. To try and get a starter blog up to say 10,000 views per month I would imagine it costs a pretty penny.

    Thing is there is plenty of scope for “free advertising”. As well as setting up your online blog you will also need Social Media accounts. Believe me my traffic increased dramatically when I went public on Social Media in particular Facebook.

    There are a lot of Rum Groups on Facebook. I joined pretty much everyone I could find. At the time not many bloggers were doing what I did. Basically I shared a link to every new review I wrote. This clearly wasn’t to everyones “tastes” and a few of the older guard of Rum Bloggers (most of whoms blogs were at the time largely inactive or only very fleetingly updated) weren’t overly impressed with this “spamming” of the Rum Forums. Fuck em.

    However, only one or two of the group owners approached me requesting I remove my links or post less regularly. I noted this all down. Around a year later one of these group owners kindly informed me he had re-considered his decision and I could post some links to his group. My response was quite a way from being a yes.

    Without Facebook and to a lesser extent Twitter, Instagram and Pinterest I probably would have abandoned the blog as it simply would never have got enough hits to sustain my interest. As a blogger I spend around 5 to 6 hours per week on the site. Which may not sound a lot, but it is when you have a young family. It’s not really worth it if only 12 people are seeing a review..

    Some bloggers will tell you they aren’t bothered about the amount of hits they receive. I honestly don’t understand or see any logic in this. I don’t spend all this time writing my blog for no-one to read it!

    Anyway, back to receiving samples. Now most of the very popular Spirits Review sites are helped by paid for advertising and as well as receiving samples from producers. They actually also get paid to feature beer, wines and spirits. These websites get visitor numbers, which any blogger is very unlikely to come close to achieving. You simply won’t get offered all the goodies they get.

    Until a blog starts to get visitors it will not get offered freebies. Some bloggers in particular those that use Instagram (rather than having a “proper” website for a blog), seem far more comfortable going out and asking for freebies. Now, unless you’ve already got links in the industry it is unlikely that any reputable or famous producers will be sending you any samples, even if you approach them.

    Initially, you are more likely to receive offers from smaller less established brands. It’s quite flattering at first and you’ll likely find it quite exciting especially your first “freebie”.

    Now I’ve never “disclosed” on the website if I have been sent anything by the producer, distributor or brand ambassador. A number of review websites have disclaimers which disclose that they will always reveal when they have received free samples. The disclaimer always includes the fact that the review will not be influenced by the sample.

    Which as far as I am concerned the very fact you feel the need to reveal this suggests to me it already has been. You doth protest too much methinks.

    If anyone thinks this is an unfair assessment always look for a bloggers lowest score. Contrast this with their scoring scale. A lot of bloggers use the 50-100 scale. Yet most might as well be using 75-100. Now whilst a score of 75 on this scale is pretty much “average” it really doesn’t look as bad at 5/10. You’ll find that most rums scored around this mark are often noted as being good mixers. Even when they are clearly priced above this and trying to position themselves as “Premium”.

    Now bloggers have a lot of reasons why they don’t use the full breadth of their scoring system. The most popular one is that they do not review “inferior” (in their eyes) or budget rum. My blog wasn’t set up to give other Rum Geeks a hard on or to make others green with envy over my latest sample of some 25 year old Caroni that was sold out over 10 years ago.

    I’ll review anything that has “rum” on it. The only way to stop people buying rubbish is to tell them what is rubbish and why. Some people are on tight budgets. They may only have £20 to spend on a bottle of rum. Now at this price point they can certainly buy more bad rum than good. If they aren’t told otherwise. There are plenty of good rums available at every price point.

    A lot of bloggers don’t use the lower end of the scoring system because they do not want to risk their flow of samples ending. So you will see quite a few reviews were relationships and often friendships are revealed. Sooner or later this relationship will be tested by a not so good quality product. It can be interesting how creative some reviews can be of fairly poor spirits. Is it really a Premium Mixer or is it not really just a terrible sip?

    Of course no blogger will ever admit to an “enhanced” review. I’ve never written anything other than the truth in a review. I would say were this ever to  be challenged I could present a more credible amount of evidence than many other bloggers. Some bloggers have went from blogging to working in the industry. Good luck but once you have crossed that line your impartiality and independence will always be questioned. You can’t really remain as a truly independent rum blogger, certainly not a reviewer if you have financial interests in certain brands or producers.

    For the record I do receive samples from producers. I do review them. I get them fairly regularly. However, I keep most of my interactions with producers and third parties (such as The Whisky Exchange and Master of Malt) at arms length. There is certainly no guarantee of a favourable review. Not a chance. No sample review is submitted to them prior to publication.

    I do have a policy for samples though and I no longer accept anything I have experience of being poor quality or questionable rum.

    Captain Morgan Jack O Blast Spiced Rum Review by the fat rum pirateA good few years back an advertising agency approached me wanting to send me a sample of Captain Morgan Pumpkin Blast in time for Halloween. As the agency was based in California, I didn’t expect them to send the sample. I gave my name and address and forgot all about it.

    Around a week later, a package arrived inside was a70cl bottle of Captain Morgan Pumpkin Blast. This was accompanied by an email suggesting ways I could promote the “rum” on Social Media. I received two further emails over the next few days outlining signature serves and some hashtags etc to use in my Social Media posts.

    I decided to get in touch with the agency. I explained to them about the site and how I hadn’t expected the sample and I would write a review but it might not be very favourable.

    To my surprise I got an email back around half an hour later. The agency apologised for not reading more of my site. They did however say I was fine to publish a review even if I hated the rum as it was all good publicity. I never got offered any more samples.

    Now, of course a review is just one mans opinion or in some instances the concensus of a couple of writers on a writing team. The biggest get out clause whenever a Blogger or a Rum Enthusiast has his opinion of a rum questioned is “Taste is subjective”. Now as far as your average non-blogger is concerned, I can live with this. However, I do not buy into the idea that someone who has set themselves up as Rum Blogger should use such a lame excuse.

    Now, I am not saying that as a Rum Blogger I am in anyway an Expert on Rum. I always laugh when bloggers add such monikers in their About Information or make claims to be anything other than a humble blogger. I’ve never felt the need to big myself up and I would prefer others to give me any such acclaim. Though I suspect most of the names I will be called might not fall into this category.

    However, if you set up a blog and start reviewing rum you are suggesting to me that you have some basic understanding of rum. To me you have gone beyond the “I like the taste” level of critique. I’m not expecting an expert opinion or viewpoint. Just something a bit beyond “Kraken is really sweet and smooth I love it – the best rum in the world”Kraken Rum

    Now I am 100% not saying that how much you enjoy a rum shouldn’t influence your review. It should be a big part of your review.  Of course it should no dispute there.

    BUT I personally think when you are reviewing a spirit as diverse as rum your own very personal tastes have to be offset slightly against a number of factors.

    Early on in my rum drinking “career” I tried a couple of Rhum Agricole’s. A La Mauny VO and Saint James Royal Ambre. I remember reading about Rhum Agricole but I didn’t really believe that it would be quite as different from molasses based “Industrial” rum as it was.

    I thought it was some kind of repulsive joke when I tried the La Mauny VO for the first time. In fact I thought my bottle had gone bad, been corked or something. It was completely foul. Although I didn’t review the La Mauny VO (I could barely stomach it, even with cola) I did try another cheaper agricole Saint James Rhum Ambre, which I did review.

    The review is still on the site – I am currently in the process of reviewing the 40% and 45% ABV versions, and will replace the current review. The review is a display of utter ignorance and arrogance. The ramblings of a fool. It’s awful.

    Put simply I hadn’t put the time in with Rhum Agricole to understand it. It is very important when reviewing any rum to try and get an understanding of what the producer is trying to achieve. If you review a White Unaged Overproof from Jamaica, don’t review it expecting it to be a elegant sipping experience best paired with a cigar. Don’t rate a cheap white rum based solely on it’s sippability. It’s not been released for that. You wouldn’t rate your Nissan Micra on it’s ability around Brands Hatch but as a functional short distance run around, it serves a perfectly good purpose.

    If you don’t “like” certain styles of rum then take this into account. If you are reviewing rum across the whole diverse spectrum of rum producing nations – you will encounter styles you prefer. Approach a rum review with an understanding of what the rum is likely to taste like rather than what you might want from rum.

    Rhum Agricole still isn’t my preferred style of rum but I can now recognise when I have a good example, of such a rum in my glass. I’ve read up on it, asked Agricole lovers and producers to get a better understanding. We are all always learning no matter how knowledgable we think we are.

    I’ll make a little caveat at this stage, whilst I am open to all styles of rum/rhum I do not consider additive laden rum to be a category in it’s own right. I do not accept the likes of Plantation’s view that the double ageing and use of sugar syrup is a “house style” as some have suggested. I still judge their rums on those against others from the nation of origin. So Plantation Xaymaca is judged against other Jamaican rums.

    In general when it comes to sweetened rums I take a dim view of the practice. As more often than not they are up to other deceptive practices. They usually offer little by way of tangible information on their products. There are no minimum age statements or any guarantee of quality. I don’t really afford them any leeway the additives usually just kill the “rum”.

    I think it’s also important to try and get some decent information on how a rum is produced. We don’t need as much information as some might advocate. Method of distillation, age of the rum(s), barrels aged in and where aged are all important factors. Along with this I would also say price has to be factored in to any overall score. It is a very significant factor. More so than many might suggest.

    Saint James Royal Ambre 45% Rum Review by the fat rum pirateNow I know some people will be a little aghast that I am even daring to suggest that your review shouldn’t relate totally to how much you enjoy the spirit. I strongly believe it should but I think a more basic understanding of what is in front of you is merited, if you are going to review as a blogger. If the rest of the world thinks Rhum JM XO is a great example of Rhum Agricole but you think it’s pish because you “don’t like Agricole”.

    Probably best parking that review. You run the risk of looking (like I did) like an uninformed prat.

    Anyway should your blog “take off” you’ll likely receive a few invites to Rum Events and Rum Festivals. Most of these take place in London. So whilst I am unable to attend many of these events, I also avoid the obligation in many cases. There are plenty bloggers and industry hangers on who will gladly attend the opening of a crisp packet. You then just have to await the gushing praise for the brand over the coming days accompanied by various soundbites parroting the Brand Ambassador. All very tedious.

    When I attend Rum Festivals I go as a grateful participant. I always make a point of thanking the organisers for any free entry they may have granted. For the last few Rum Festivals I haven’t worn any “identifying” clothing. It can however be difficult to try and pretend to be a punter when people know or recognise me.

    I try not to tell people I’m a blogger when I visit a stand. A lot of people from most etablished brands know me but if I go unrecognised I do not mention being a blogger. I will chat and try the producers rum. If I like them and what they are doing I will hand them a card. Especially if they are a small producer doing something interesting. Unfortunately, you don’t tend to hear back very often from these brands. With so many rums out there I often lose track or forget who I have met.

    As a blogger Rum Festivals are a good way of getting a better perspective of the market. It is easy for a Rum Enthusiast to think the “Rum World” are all drinking Foursquare Exceptional Cask Series, Hampden DOK or Independent Demerara Rum bottlings. Even at London Rum Festival, where a considerable number of people with Caribbean heritage attend, there are still a lot of casual Kraken and Coke drinkers and people thinking “smooth” sweetened junk like Don Papa is great rum.Hydrometer Tests by the fat rum pirate

    As far as the rum blogging scene is concerned it has changed dramatically. A number of more established Rum Blogs have fallen by the wayside or are simply hardly ever updated. New blogs have sprouted up with huge dedication and enthusiasm….for a few months. Before being mothballed or going on a break.

    It is perhaps more fragmented than before, with very different views and perspectives. Which is a reflection very much of how the Rum Scene in general has “split” since additives were exposed.

    The next few years will be very interesting.

     

  • Dictador Distillery Icon Reserve Aged 20 Years Solera System Rum

    Dictador Distillery Icon Reserve Aged 20 Years Solera System Rum review by the fat rum pirateDictador Distillery Icon Reserve Aged 20 Years Solera System Rum.  Quite a mouthful but thats what they’ve put on the label.  Quite how Aged 20 Years and “Solera System Rum” works is anyones guess, however.

    Dictador are a rum brand from Colombia. They also have lines of coffee, cigars and gin.  I’ve not been around the rum scene for that long but Dictador 12 was one of the first “premium” rums I bought.  I reviewed it in the early days of this blog. As was one of the aims of this blog I have learnt a great deal about rum since then.  I won’t revisit that review until I have completed this one.  I don’t recall being blown away by Dictador 12 though.

    Dictador rums are the kind of rums you will find in high end department stores that like to stock designer “gear”.  You’ll find them along side the likes of Zacapa XO, DIplomatico and Don Papa.  Presentation wise the Japanese made squat opaque bottles are very attractive and the black and blue colourway on this particular bottling is striking.  Presentation wise these are very much “designer” rums.  If there is indeed such a thing.

    A 70cl bottle of Dictador Aged 20 Years Solera System Rum will set you back around £50 it is bottled at a rather standard 40% ABV.  Dictador rums are pretty easy to pick up in the UK.  They have definitely tapped into the market.  Having said that I don’t really hear that much talk about them in rum circles.  Except when the Solera System gets brought up or we begin talking about the origin of rums…..

    Or when we start talking about “Virgin Sugar Cane Honey”.  The Dictador website is as slick as the bottles. Taking the information from the website you would believe this rum is a 20 year old aged in a Solera System.  Which doesn’t make a great deal of sense to me.  Dictador note that is a blend of rums distilled in Copper Alembic (Pot) and a Steel Continuous Column.  Which produces a “medium bodied” rum.  It seems to me Dictador are using the finest Grade A marketing tactics as used by Zacapa and Diplomatico with their descriptors.

    Dictador are a brand who claim to have been in existence since 1913. The following slideshow gives you more information on the brand.  The brand hails from Cartagena de Indias.  Dictador Distillery Icon Reserve Aged 20 Years Solera System Rum review by the fat rum pirateInteresting Dictador have a master blender rather than distiller Hernan Parra.

    When I originally tried the Dictador 12 I did think it had been adultered in some way.  I still hold this view.  True it “passed” the Hydrometer test but that can be easily fooled by other sweet alcohols such as sweet wine and other less invasive additives.  I’ve not seen anything which explains how the flavour has been produced. They do not mention anywhere I have seen what the rum in the Solera is aged in ie what type of barrels/casks.

    My thoughts on the flavour profile of Dictador will be revealed more over the next few paragraphs as I nose and taste this rum.

    Dictador Distillery Icon Reserve Aged 20 Years is a rich, dark brown colour. Without knowing the exact age of the rums in the blend (it is not a full 20 years) I’d still be surprised if the colour was entirely natural.

    A quick nosing reveals a very sweet, light almost Cuban style rum. It’s slightly floral but it does have a quite surpising hit of alcohol fumes. It’s reasonably spicy but it all seems a little “candied”. Overall the nose isn’t bad and there is quite a bit to come back to and far amount of complexity.  Licorice, cinnamon and some sweet boozy notes – like a younger rum sometimes exhibits. There is a hint of tobacco and a touch of tar. Overall though its mostly sweet.

    Sipped you get coffee, a lot of coffee. Sweet sugary coffee. It’s actually a lot more spicy than I had expected. I do believe quite a portion of rum a LOT younger than 20 years is in this blend. I’m not getting much of the pot still rum – its not doing much in this blend. Blind I would have assumed this was all column. It’s light and inoffensive. It has a reasonable amount of alcohol burn to reassure you it is a 40% spirit. Unfortunately it doesn’t have a lot of what I would determine as “rummy” characteristics. It’s more like a kind of sherried flavoured vodka. I’m sure such a drink exists somewhere.

    Sweet, light bordering on floral and with that strange coffee like hit especially on the finish. Which is very short. It’s an interesting spirit but I wouldn’t want to be forking out £50 on this if I wanted a bottle of rum.

    It’s agreeable and easy enough to drink. Whether it is really a rum I’m not so sure. It didn’t hold my interest. It’s certainly different to a lot of rums on the market. I’m not sure that is a good thing though.

     

     

  • Foursquare Rum Distillery Empery

    Foursquare Rum Distillery Empery Rum Review by the fat rum pirateFoursquare Rum Distillery Empery. This is one of three “sherried” rums from Foursquare, which have appeared on the market over the past few weeks.

    All are official Foursquare releases and all contain rums aged for 14 years. Foursquare Rum Distillery Empery is an Exceptional Cask Selection release. Mark IX – the ninth in the series. Closely followed by the latest “straight bourbon” matured 2007.

    I’ve already reviewed Hereditas, which was the Whisky Exchange Exclusive rum and I will shortly be putting Patrimonio to the test which is distributed in Europe by Velier.

    This is the cheapest of the three releases coming in at around £65 it’s available at The Whisky Exchange but isn’t exclusive to them. Other retailers are stocking this rum.

    Foursquare Rum Distillery Empery is a blend of Pot/Column distilled rum aged for14 years in ex-bourbon casks and a portion of Pot Column distilled rum which was aged for 10 years in ex-bourbon casks and then matured for a further 4 years in ex-sherry casks. It has been bottled at Cask Strength 56& ABV. So it has a very similar make up to Hereditas and Patrimonio.

    Presentation wise the ECS have all been released in “traditional” stubby Foursquare bottles which are also used for the Doorly’s rum range. The labels continue to contain a wealth of information on the actual rum. Following issues with the natural cork stoppers Foursquare are now using synthetic plastic topped stoppers in the main – though my Empery has a wooden stopper.

    Foursquare have also begun adding a kind of Olympic medal style pendant on the neck of the bottle. They’ve also dropped the “Rum Distillery” part of the title – I personally preferred it that way. For no particular reason I can think of.

    In the glass we are presented with a dark brown spirit with a very vivid orange hue. Nosing reFoursquare Rum Distillery Empery Rum Review by the fat rum pirateveals a sweet easy going, very fruity Barbados rum. I would say most people familiar would recognise this as Foursquare product. The sherry influence isn’t quite as pronounced as it is with Hereditas. It’s still fruity – raisins, sultanas and a hint of blackberry but it doesn’t have quite the same sherried note as Hereditas does.

    Dark chocolate – almost like fruit infused chocolate and some pistachio are present. Oak spice and some vanilla do mingle in with the nose but the ex-bourbon cask influence isn’t quite as apparent as with other Foursquare releases.

    Empery’s nose is similar to Hereditas, however once you begin sipping you realise the differences between the two rums.

    For me this rum drinks more like Dominus or Criterion. It’s rich, dark and quite woody. The fruity elements of the nose are dialled back a notch on the sip.

    The initial entry is fairly sweet with notes of raisin and red grapes. This quickly moves into a spicy and quite oaky mid palate. The flavours are intense – lots of dark fruits, tobacco and a ginger and black pepper explosion.

    This is a drier, more intense tasting rum than Hereditas. Even though Hereditas was bottled at Cask Strength it was much “lighter” and easier to drink. This is a rum you will probably spend more time, between each sip. It’s just a touch more complex.

    Finish wise the Cask Strength really plays it part on the finish. It is very long and leaves a real tingle on the tongue. Rich and oaky with a lot of spice from the barrel.

    It’s a very good rum (my near empty bottle is testament to that) if another producer put this out it would cause all kinds of ripples amongst rum geeks. With Foursquare it’s just another excellent rum. No surprise really. The surprise will come when Richard releases something mediocre.

    In my review of Hereditas, I alluded to the fact that my scoring scale gives me little wiggle room. I haven’t got the joy of being able to rate a rum as 91 rather than 92. To be honest I didn’t do that for a reason – I just don’t think it’s necessary. I really honestly couldn’t justify why I might give Foursquare 2006 95 points and then give Destino 96. I probably would have driven myself mad ranking and rating all theFoursquare Rum Distillery Empery Rum Review by the fat rum pirate rums I have tasted.

    Read what I say about the rum. It might be that, what I don’t like about a rum is what you might find really appealing. The score is important but its only my opinion.

    I guess this is leading up to a big BUT with this rum. Not really, to be honest I just want to explain why I am awarding this rum a lower mark than Hereditas.

    I just find Hereditas easier to drink – Empery has a slightly drier/bitter note, especially on the finish, where Hereditas is fruitier. It’s a personal preference. I know for a fact a lot of rum lovers will prefer this over Hereditas.

    Neither rum has a poor “balance” – something which I have always found with Foursquare rums. The balance and blend of the rums is always nigh on perfect. You always feel the rum is exactly what Richard was looking for. He’s produced 3 rums which look very similar when written down. When blended and bottled we have three very distinct expressions. A review of Patrimonio will follow soon. For more opinions on Empery (and 2007) have a look at Rum Revelations.

    My advice on which Foursquare rum to buy?

    Buy them all. After all Empery means “Absolute Sovereignty” and at the moment Foursquare are pretty much ruling the rum world.

  • That Boutique-y Rum Company Diamond Distillery (Versailles Still) 13 Year Old

    That Boutique-y Rum Company Diamond Distillery (Versailles Still) 13 Year Old rum review by the fat rum pirateThat Boutique-y Rum Company Diamond Dsitillery (Versailles Still) 13 Year Old. This particular bottling, was one of the first releases by the Boutique-y Rum Company. As a result I am quite surprised that it is still available. Maybe this review might help sell the last few bottles? If it’s positive, of course and if anyone listens to me…….

    This rum was distilled on the Versailles Single Wooden Pot Still, which has been housed at Versailles, Enmore and Uitvlugt distilleries in its time, before finally settling at Diamond Distillery aka Demerara Distillers Limited. If you wish to read a little more information on the various stills at DLL try this. It’s pretty brief but gives a nice overview.

    This rum was distilled back in July 2004. It was aged initially in refill rum casks until 2011, when it was re-casked in more ex-rum casks. I am unsure whether this indicates the point at which tropical ageing was replaced by continental ageing, though it seems logical. I’m unsure how much aged rum DDL ship out. It has been bottled at 56.1% ABV it is a single cask and 439 bottles are available It is worth noting the bottle size is 50cl so slightly smaller than the usual 70cl bottle. The rum is available via Master of Malt and retails at £64.95.

    The wacky design on the bottle is provided by Jim’ll Paint It who is known for his bizarre Microsoft paint drawings requested by his fans on Facebook. The design is described as such

    “Here we can see Pete Holland from The Floating Rum Shack dismayed at the fire underneath the wooden pot still. So dismayed in fact that he seems to have taken leave of his senses and is simultaneously using a chocolate teapot and a glass hammer while playing darts on an inflatable board. Excellent multitasking but perhaps it’s time to rethink those purchases Pete…”

    Yes, quite I have no idea what this is all about to be honest so we best just move onto the rum review.

    In the glass we are presented with a straw/golden brown coloured spirit. Lighter than a lot of the aged rum I have seen from the Versailles still. Admittedly a lot of those rums have caramel added as a colourant. Unlike this it would appear.

    The nose is more familiar. Sweet notes of raisin and some light sugar cane. Toffee and a note of vanilla. More savoury spicy woody oak and some very light vanilla.

    Hazelnuts and mixed peel also arrive on the nose and a touch of star anise. A slightly malty note is present throughout, giving it a slightly whisky like feel. It’s nice and familiar and more balanced than some Versailles rum, which are overladen with too much caramel colouring/added molasses giving a slightly bitter note at times. It’s fresh smelling and slightly zesty. Not as woody and oak heavy as some Demerara’s and it is a touch musty on the nose.

    Sipped That Boutique-y Rum Company Diamond Distillery. is initially quite spicy and quite dry. There isn’t a great deal fo sweetness to this. It’s certainly not an El Dorado style Demerara. Woody oaky spice and some ginger greet the taste buds along with some savoury and slightly malty notes. Freshly sanded wood and some saw dust alongside some malted barley and some very medicinal notes of cough mixture. Calpol/paracetamol like flavours.

    It’s a very complex rum, with a lot going on in the mix. As a sipper it is not the easiest to drink. It’s a rum you will enjoy when you have time on your hands, to really spend time with it. It’s not for chugging back or for mixing.

    Once you get past the initial sip the mid palate really develops into a very intense spicy experience. This is quite a dry rum but it is full of different spices and nuances. One minute you are getting Christmas cake the next you are getting pencils shavings.

    Finish wise it is of reasonable length and it has a nice balance to it. Personally, I prefer a slightly sweeter take on Demerara but this is still a nicely balanced and well aged drop of rum.

     

  • Colombina Cachaca de Minas Serie Especial 10 Anos

    Colombina Cachaca de Minas Serie Especial 10 Anos Rum Review by the fat rum pirateColombina Cachaca de Minas Serie Especial 10 Anos. Cachaça under the Colombina moniker was first produced way back in 1920. The brand hails from Alvinopolis, Santa Barbara, MInas Gerais in Brasil – as always with Cachaca.

    The Canjica farm where Colombina was first produced has been producing Cachaca since the late 19th century. The Canjica sugar mill is of recognised historical value as one of the “principal mills remaining from the colonial period in Minas Gerais”.

    In the 1980’s Raul Megre resumed the production and bottling of Columbina Cachaca. Since then it has been produced exclusively at Canjica Sugar Mill.

    This cachaça is produced in small batches on Pot Stills. What makes Colombina Cachaca different to most are the century-old vats made from native Jatoba wood used to age the Colombina Cachaca’s. Colombina Cachaca de Minas Serie Espeical 10 Anos has been bottled at 45% ABV.

    I dare say if this Cachaca came to Europe it would need an updated presentation. This is pretty old fashioned. Though the square shaped bottle is quite nice. The colour scheme and metal screw cap are less than salubrious. The whole affair is a liitle Cartoon-ish – it reminds me a little of black and white Betty Boop style cartoons for some reason.

    In Brasil this retails at around R$290 which would work out at around £58 for a 70cl bottle. I would expect this to retail for a bit more should it ever make it over here.

    In the glass Colombina Cachaca Serie Especial 10 Anos is a white wine colour – just slightly off white. So the Jatoba casks haven’t added much colour in the 10 years.

    Nosing Colombina Cachaca Serie Especial it’s nice sweet smelling creamy style of cachaça. Double cream, cream fraiche and a nice hit of sweet sugar cane aromas. Despite the lack of colour in the cachaça there some nice spicy woody notes. There is a slight smokiness to the cachaça maybe a tiny hint of tobacco.

    Sipped Colombina Cachaca Serie Especial is a very unusual tasting cachaça. The Jatoba wood certainly brings a very different tasting spirit. Whilst it exhibits familiar notes similar to other cachaca’s – the creaminess remains alongside the sweet sugar cane notes. The woody notes on the mid palate are very different. Sweet, slightly smoky and with a very unusual spicy note which I can’t quite place.Colombina Cachaca de Minas Serie Especial 10 Anos Rum Review by the fat rum pirate

    This is a very nicely balanced Cachaca. Easy going even at 45%. The finish has an almost sooty note to it which is bit of surprise compared to the overall sweeter nature of this spirit.

    It’s nice to taste a very different style of cachaça. This is nicely balanced maybe a bit too easy going at times, even at the slightly higher ABV of 45%.

    The finish could have do with a bit more oomph. It fades a little to quickly. The initial sip and mid palate are very tasty and interesting but the finish isn’t as complex as I might have liked.

    That aside this again is a very nice example of an aged Cachaca and it is interesting to find so many styles within just one (admittedly very large) country.

    I didn’t bother mixing this one as I felt its subtle flavours and balance would just vanish in the drink. It is very much a Cachaca to slowly sip and savour.

    The 3 year old I also tried at the Cachaca Festival in Manchester was also very tasty.

    You never know maybe one day these will reach out beyond Brasil.

     

  • Ron del Barrilito 3 Star

    Ron del Barrilito 3 Star Rum Review by the fat rum pirateRon del Barrilito 3 star. This is perhaps one of the most misunderstood and controversial “rums” in the rum world. On researching this rum, it seems history has been re-written time and time again with regards as to what exactly this rum really is.

    A lot of the confusion is caused by “word of mouth” and people passing on information from brand ambassadors, fellow enthusiasts and on occasion the actual producers of Ron del Barrilito. If you try and research this rum you are left with the impression, this could be anything from the greatest rum ever, to a very average “spiced” rum. As with most things, the truth when such polar opposites exist is perhaps more somewhere around the centre of the argument!

    At this point I am going to make a disclosure with regard this rum. Anything I write after this regarding its composition, could be complete rubbish. My tasting notes and the Hydrometer Test I conduct are the only parts of this review I will stand by. Anything else can (and will) be changed if someone can convince me I have got something wrong.

    Ron del Barrilito 3 Star is not readily available here in the UK. It is easier to find in Europe but its easiest to find in the US. From what I can see it retails at around $30-35. Were it to come to the UK, I would probably expect to pay the best part of £45 for a bottle. Ron Del Barralito when it does appear tends to be in a US sized 75cl bottle. Rather than the standard metric 70cl UK/Europe bottle. It is bottled at 43% ABV.

    It is understood to be a rum produced by Serralles (Don Q).However, more up to date information suggests the company behind Ron del Barrilito source their base rum now from Bacardi. Ron del Barrilito 3 star is a blend of column distilled rums aged up to 6 years. It is “blended” and aged in “seasoned sherry casks”. The hydrometer detects around 8g/L of additives – so this would suggest the “seasoned sherry casks” are not 100% clean when the rum is blended………

    The brand have their own website. Upon entering this you are first hit with the fact that Ron del Barrilito is Puerto Rico’s Oldest Rum. It also notes the 3 star as being a blend of rums aged between 6 and 10 years old. As I said earlier researching this brand has proved very…..interesting/frustrating.

    The website also states the following “Every single bottle of Ron del Barrilito holds premium rum that has been crafted by hand using the same methods since 1880. It’s always been made in very small batches. Absolutely no artificial ingredients or colorings are used. It’s aged to perfection in vintage american white oak sherry barrels.”

    Ron del Barrilito 3 Star Rum Review by the fat rum pirateRon del Barrilito is produced by the Fernandez family at the Hacienda Santa Ana. They state that both their “regular” rums, the 2 and 3 star are produced in small batches. Last year they released a very expensive 5 star version, which again proved quite controversial and provoked a lot of very differing opinions! Mostly due to the price point! You can read about the 5 star in more detail here. $750 per bottle though…..

    Presentation wise Ron del Barrilito 3 Star comes in a standard bar style bottle with an old style “Cuban” kind of presentation. I quite like its vintage look and I would probably pull a bottle from the shelf if I was out shopping.

    In the glass we have a dark brown spirit with an orange hue. Nosing Ron del Barrilito 3 star is a pleasant experience. It is a very “Cuban” style of rum with lots of tobacco, tar and some sweet milk chocolate notes.

    Further nosing reveals some sweet sherry which become quite dominant on the nose. It’s a very fruity nose with lots of raisins and currants. There is a slightly peppery spice mingling alongside the sweet sherried notes.

    It’s all quite nicely balanced and overall quite pleasant.

    Sipped Ron del Barrilito is very smooth and very easy to sip. It has a mouthfeel which is perhaps a touch more oily than I would like and it has a confected air to it. It’s a pretty sweet rum. The tobacco and tar that were evident on the nose have been totally taken over by the sherried fruit sweetness. This does in many ways taste like an aged sherry rather than a rum.Ron del Barrilito 3 Star Rum Review by the fat rum pirate

    The initial sweetness fade into a fairly short mid palate which has a little ginger and cinnamon. The lightness of the spirit means it quickly disappears and has a fairly short finish. Tobacco and smoke and a very quick fade.

    I found this okay as a sipper, though for me it’s just too light. As a mixer it works nicely with cola making a very pleasant rum and cola or rather sherry and cola. If you are familiar with aged sherry such as Torres 10 Year Old you will find a lot of similarity with this rum. If you like a brandy and cola you will find comfort in this rum.

    Overall it’s not a terrible experience and I can understand why it has so many fans. Unfortunately, it doesn’t really taste all that “rummy” to me and has a confected air to it and the sherry influence is just a little bit more than I would like. We aren’t in Dos Maderas territory here in terms of additives but its still quite a sweet spirit.

    I’m pleased I have tried this rum. That said I wouldn’t break my back to try and get a bottle in the future.

     

2 Comments

  1. Pardon the ignorance. Green Engineering and Forsythe are still makers or they are the name of stills?

Comments are closed.