Cachaca of the Year 2020

Cachaca of the Year 2020 rum cachaca review by the fat rum pirateCachaca of the Year 2020. For our first Cachaca of the Year, I willl not name a shortlist, I will just announce which cachaca I enjoyed the most this year.  To be honest (and shame on you all) the reviews of cachaca I do, just don’t generate the same kind of interest that my usual rum reviews do.

This is partly because cachaca is still very much a “niche” product outside of Brasil. So, I understand that a lot of you probably won’t look to read a review of a spirit you cannot actually access. Which is fair enough I guess.

I work closely with Leszek Wedzicha who is a cachaca enthusiast and advocate. He visits distilleries in Brasil and sources samples of cachaca for me to review. From the outset, the project we are working on, has been about raising the profile of cachaca in the UK/Europe.

Leszek, was very keen for me to build up a portfolio of cachaca reviews – written in English. The idea being that this will create more interest in cachaca in Europe, thus enabling and encouraging producers looking to export into Europe. In turn growing awareness of cachaca outside of Brasil.

For anyone who hasn’t tried cachaca ,it is more available than you might think with Master of Malt and The Whisky Exchange having a very healthy selection. You’ll even find some over at everyones favourite online retailer – Amazon.

Before I reveal the Cachaca of the Year I will give a few notable mentions of other cachacas I have tried this year that have been very impressive. First up we have an SBS bottling from 1423, which stricitly speaking isn’t cachaca but its mighty tasty nonetheless. Brasilian distillate meets European ageing.

I would also advise picking up a bottle of this unaged “straight from the still” cachaca from Magnifica which is available at a bargain price over at Master of Malt.

Without further ado my cachaca of the year for 2020 is Delicana Balsamo Aged 10 Years. This is a cachaca which is available in Europe. The person responsible for the brand Bert Ostermann, is based in Germany. I have only had a couple of cachacas which have beaten this one. As the review indicates a higher ABV would probably give this a bit more oomph. That said even at 40% it’s a great cachaca which I enjoyed immensely.

If you are interested it is available here.

Delicana Balsamo Aged 10 Years Cachaca review by the fat rum pirate

Similar Posts

  • Cachaca Peruacu

    Cachaca Peruacu Rum Review by the fat rum pirateCachaca Peruacu. The producers behind Cachaca Peruacu have been active since 1995 producing cachaça. However, the Cachaca Peruacu brand has only been in existence since 2012.

    The name Peruacu is derived from the indigenous Tupi Guarani language and means “Big Cave”. The Cavernos do Peruacu National park, which is located in the North of Minas Gerais is home to more than 140 ancient caves. Cachaca Peruacu is produced in Januaria, Minas Gerais. One the real “heartlands” of cachaça. A bit like Barbados or Jamaica in cachaça terms.

    The production of cachaça Peruaçu is performed during the dry season (June to September). This is when the producers feel the Brix (sugar content) of the cane is at the best level for cachaça production. All harvesting and preparation of the sugar cane is done on site and within 12 hours of the harvest.

    As an artisanal cachaça, without chemical additives the “yeast caipira”, used in fermentation is manufactured on site, with a little of the syrup mixed with cornmeal.

    Cachaca Peruacu is then distilled on small Alembic Copper Pot Stills before being aged for two years in native Amburana wood casks. Cachaca Peruacu retails at around R$40 in Brasil which is around £8. Once again were this to make it to the UK I would be surprised to see it much cheaper than £30.

    Presentation wise the label and logo are quite modern but the bottle style is old school cachaça, long bottle with a short thick neck and an oversized screw cap top. The cachaça comes in a variety of size bottles the 670ml retails at the R$40 mark and is the largest I can see.

    Whilst the brand have a website – it doesn’t even have a photo of the cachaça! It’s quite good for information but could be improved. The website suggests chilling this cachaça and drinking it neat.

    In the glass we have a straw/white wine coloured spirit. The nose is very aromatic – quite flowery but with a lot of “butteryness”. In some ways a bit like rum butter. Sweet notes of slightly sweetened squirty cream and vanilla ice cream. Which mingles alongside a nice spicy hint of ginger and baking spices. Shortbread, custard creams and just a very slight hint of aniseed.

    It’s a really nice nose for such a young cachaça. It has minimal “boozy” notes despite being a slightly higher ABV of 42%.

    Sipped, not chilled it is again a real surprise. I really like these amburana aged cachacas this is no exception. Really nice creamy delivery on the palate with just the right weight of spicy ginger and vanilla notes. There is a slightly zesty note in ther as well. A touch of lemon juice but nothing which throws the cachaça off balance.

    Finish wise – as I am finding with a lot of cachaça, it isn’t overly big or complex but this one seems to linger slightly longer than some of a similar age. It’s a nice clean, fresh slightly peppery finish with a lot of vanilla and ginger notes.

    It is perhaps in the mid palate and the finish where you notice most that this is a fairly youthful cachaça. It does get a bit uneven in places. The nose and the initial entry are definitely the best part of this cachaça.

    I did mix this and whilst it worked pretty well especially in a Caiprinha. I found it superior as a sipper though. Mixed, it was perhaps a touch too light and it lost a lot of flavour. At the price point,(if you are in Brasil) you might struggle to find a cachaça that is as tasty as this as sipper.

    It’s not perfect or one of the greatest cachaca’s I have ever had but its bordering on being very good! I dare say another year or two in the amburana and we might have a real contender on our hands.

     

     

  • Premium Rum The Impossible Task? – Part Two

    premium rum the impossible task part two by the fat rum pirateIn the first part of this series we touched upon how rums are labelled.  I used an example to show how confusing it can be to determine a Premium rum.

    Marketing and packaging play a huge role in what the end consumer buys.  No matter who you are, you will encounter and be influenced by marketing at some stage.  Even if you think you aren’t.

    It is fair to say that some Rum Producers are absolute masters at the art.  With big brand backing comes big advertising and marketing budgets.  Some producers have already taken steps to ensure that their products are deemed “Premium”.

    When I first began exploring rums I had little idea about Rhum Agricole.  I would still class myself as a bit of “newbie” when it comes to this  rhum category.

    Produced from Fresh Cane Juice. The cost of producing such rhum is more expensive than molasses based rum.  As a result Agricole producers are at a slight disadvantage when it comes to cost conscious customers.

    One of the ways Rhum Agricole producers ensure their survival is by selling a lot of unaged white rhum.  If you ever go into a larger Carrefour store in France you will be surprised at the amount of agricole rhum available.  A lot of this is at entry level prices.  I guess the mark up on such bottles isn’t great but the volume is.

    Once you get beyond these inexpensive white agricoles we get into aged Agricole territory. This is where the molasses rum world needs to wake up and take a look at how the French speaking population are doing it.

    As with Champagne and Cognac the Caribbean island of Martinique has ensured that their product is protected under French law..

    The AOC (Appellation d’Origine Contrôlée))  is the equivalent of the EU’s Protectedaoc Designation of Origin (PDO).  Which protects things such as Parma Ham and Wensleydale Cheese.  It sets out clear guidelines regarding production.  A link to the guidelines are here.

    The AOC decree elevates rhum from Martinique and gives it a status which others rhums cannot have.  It is a clever move and one which causes quite a lot of disagreementss about what rhum agricole can and can’t be!

    Despite the AOC other rhum producing islands are still held in high esteem.  Brands such as Haiti’s Barbancourt as are brands from Guadeloupe such as Longueteau and Damoiseau.

    It’s not just the AOC which makes me feel agricole producers have done more to elevate their products into “Premium” category, than molasses based producers.  It is also the way they have chosen to label and present their rhums.  I think this is where other producers could learn.

    Terms such as XO are used in molasses based rums.  It is only agricole producers though who seem confident enough to use terms such as VO or Rhum Vieux for rhums aged only a couple of years.

    La MaunyTaking influence from the ultimate luxury spirit Cognac – most agricole producers have adopted labelling which suggests “luxury”.

    Pictured is La Mauny VO (Very Old) the rhum is only 3 years old.  As you can see the presentation screams out Premium Rum – the decanter is particularly impressive.  I have a bottle of this at home and whilst I didn’t find the contents all that impressive – I certainly liked the packaging.  Compare this to a similarly aged molasses based rum.  You won’t get the fancy decanter!

    I’m not suggesting Molasses based producers should put average rums in fancy packaging nor am I suggesting this is what Agricole producers are doing.  They just seem to have more confidence in their aged products.

     I do feel though that by using some of the Cognac terminology in their labelling of rhum they have made it more consistent and recognisable than the various naming and labelling conventions used in Molasses based rum.  Admittedly it might still be confusing at times but I’d say easier to research the terms used in Agricole than try and decipher the various codes used in labelling molasses rum. 

    Despite all this though Rhum Agricole has still not elevated itself outside of French speaking territories.  Molasses based rum is still more popular worldwide.

    So what do molasses based rum producers do to market and package their rums to elevate them into the Premium category?

    Big brands such as Appleton Estate and Mount Gay have Appleton Estate Reserve Blend Rum Review by the fat rum pirateadopted a hybrid of largely meaningless names and age statements.  They occasionally use the odd Agricole moniker as well,

    Appleton Estate have Appleton Special, Appleton Signature Blend (formerly V/X), Appleton Rare Blend Aged 12 Years and Appleton 21 Year Old.

    Mount Gay release Mount Gay Eclipse, Black Barrel XO (Extra Old) and 1703.

    So what else has the molasses or industrial rum world been doing in recent years to try and elevate their “Premium” rums? 

    We’ll take a look at that in Part 3.

     

     

     

     

  • Sapucaia Real 18 Years

    Sapucaia Real 18 Years Cachaca review by the fat rum pirateSapucaia Real 18 Years. Sapucaia is a brand of cachaça from Pindamonhangaba, Sao Paolo state. The Sapucaia brand began way back in 1933 on the Sapucaia and Coruputuba farms. The farms were run by local entrepreneur Cicero da Silva Prado.

    “Sapucaia” is a majestic tree found in the Mata Atlantica forest in Brasil. “Real” translates to Royal in English. Sapucaia have a range of cachaca’s – this cachaca’s story began in 2007.

    Sapucaia hired a beverage consultancy at Senac Renato Frascino to make an overall assessment in their stocks. Around 500,000 litres of cachaça!  Stored in various tanks, 500 and 250 litre Oak, Peanut and 3o litre Jequitibá-rosa barrels. All holding long aged cachaças. With this review, Sapucaia would make a general balance of stocks and assess the quality of their aged cachaças, aiming to check if we still had the stocks necessary to produce an older cachaça.

    The Sapucaia Real 18 Years that is available today is from stocks of Oak Aged Cachaca from 1990. The cachaça was fermented using maize flavour before being distilled in small batches on Copper Pot Stills.

    You can actually buy a bottle of this cachaça if you are in Europe as The Cachaca Company stock it. The cost is €145. It is bottled at 40% ABV. Presentation wise it’s not bad with a tall long bottle with a very short neck. The label is fairly simple and perhaps not as premium as the price tag might suggest. That said its the contents that really matters.

    Sapucaia have a website which can be translated into English. It’s quite an informative site so should you wish to learn more about the brand I would advise having a little look around the site.

    In the glass Sapucaia Real is a golden to dark brown colour.

    The nose is very much influenced by the oak and the extensive ageing. Vanilla and oak spices fill the nose alongside caramel and toffee notes. A slight milkiness brings things together along with a touch of nutmeg. If I was given this blind I am not entirely sure I would identify it as a cachaça. Maybe an aged Agricole but it does have a lot of similarities with molasses based rums. Which shows just how much influence long ageing in a tropical climate can have on a distillate.

    Such is the sweetness on the nose I was curious to see how it faired with a Hydrometer – it came up clean so no added sugar.

    Sipped you are instantly reminded this is a cachaça and not a molasses rum. The sweetness on the nose is replaced in part by a slightly vegetal note and some very mineral heavy notes. It is nowhere near as sweet as the nose suggested. Big wafts of ginger, nutmeg and a slight peppery heat but for an initial sip it’s very agreeable.

    Further sips reveal more of the complexity and the sweetness of this cachaça. Vanilla and some pineapple juice maybe a little banana. This is a very nicely balanced cachaça and the mid palate and finish flow nicely – really nice balance from the oak spices and the toffee and caramel. The finish is quite long and leaves a nice fade of rich spicy oak.Sapucaia Real 18 Years Cachaca review by the fat rum pirate

    One of the best things about this cachaça is the balance. It’s all just so well put together. As a spirit it could compete with anything. There are no off notes or anything that shouldn’t be there. It keeps it’s identity as a cachaça as well once you begin sipping.

    Further sips reveal more subtle flavours of almond and pecans – a slight nuttiness which mingles nicely with the ginger. It would be very interesting to put this in a flight of aged Agricole or molasses rums and see what people make of it.

    If they know anything about good spirits they will be mightily impressed – cracking stuff.

     

  • Rum Blogging – A Blogger’s Perspective

    Rum Blogging - A Blogger's Perspective Article by the fat rum pirateRum Blogging – A Blogger’s Perspective. Starting this blog was one of the most challenging, yet rewarding things I have done in my adult life. The first thing which became immediately apparent to me was that my general grammar and ability to actually write something, had slipped considerably. I had after all left Full Time Education some18 years prior. It is still far from perfect!

    Computers or rather computer software such as Word and Excel has left us lazy and overly reliant on things like spellcheck and formulae. These correct and calculate things as we go. For all of my adult life, I have worked as a Civil Servant. Which has involved sending out pre-written forms and letters. For good reason, most communications to the great British public are carefully vetted and approved before being allowed to be used.

    So, I have in many ways been able to get through adult life without really having to sit down and write anything of even a fair to medium level of complexity or length.

    I am aware of incorrect apostrophes, spelling mistakes, mis-used words and completely made up ones appearing on this blog. Likely in this article.

    Although, I may not be the biggest fan of the term, I am very much a Blogger rather than a writer. For me a writer would be someone qualified in some way, so they can use such a term. Whether that be through formal qualifications, such as being a journalist or maybe because they had something published and paid for doing so.

    If you look up the term “Blog” the following definition applies

    “a regularly updated website or web page, typically one run by an individual or small group, that is written in an informal or conversational style.

    My site is very definitely updated regularly and my style, warts and all, including all the things already mentioned is very informal! I also hope it has a conversational flow. One of my favourite bloggers is actually a vlogger called Ralfy Mitchell, who runs the very popular Whisky (and other quality spirits) review Youtube site Ralfy.com

    Ralfy is very knowledgeable and, by his own admission a whisky anorak. However, despite being very serious about his whisky he is entertaining, engaging, amusing and occasionally a bit ranty. He keeps you thoroughly engrossed throughout his videos.

    I have tried to keep the tone of my blog serious but not overtly so. I still try and keep a little bit of me in each review, much like Ralfy does. If this blog comes anywhere near being as influential as Ralfy’s I will consider myself to have done a job well done. I don’t think it is going to happen but I can still keep on trying.

    All this being said, I am not the best writer in the Rum World. There are numerous others who can but things far more eloquently than myself. People with a much better understanding and usage of the English language. I arguably could write a little better. I certainly could cut out some of the mistakes. The thing is it is not in my nature, unlike other reviewers to write notes in advance. Nor do I have numerous “sessions” with a rum trying to identify and verify all the tastes and sensations they have experienced.

    When I come to write a review it is very often done in one sitting. I usually take around an hour to go from a blank page to a review, complete with background research, photos (the one thing which is done in advance by my very supportive wife) and the nosing/tasting notes of the chosen rum. I have a quick scan through, bear in mind I’ve likely had a few glasses of said rum, to make sure it reads okay. It will then either be published immediately or a draft saved for a later date. I do usually re-read a draft prior to publishing it. Sometimes……

    I’m the type of person who spends quite a lot of time thinking about things, so when I come to write I usually have a pretty good idea already sketched out in my mind. I’m also impatient and like to get things “done”. I can’t stand people that piss about procrastinating over things. Nothing iriritates my more people who cannot make a decision and hum and ha and dilly dally.

    At the end of the day if one of my reviews is a bit shit, I’m sure people will be quick to tell me!

    Now as well as establishing that I am not the greatest writer in the world, I will also advise all potential bloggers on the other major pitfall in starting a blog. WordPress. Now WordPress is a great tool for self-publishing on the Internet. I am not sure how easy other blogging platforms such as Wix and Blogger are but WordPress has a pretty difficult learning curve.

    It is a lot more difficult to get a web site looking and behaving as you would like than you might imagine. You can lose days searching for the light “plug in” to send emails to your followers or hours upon hours trying to get a menu or table to go where you want it to go and behave as you wish. I can’t do any computer coding or anything like that. I see computers as functional tools designed to make my life easier. They can program themselves as far as I’m concerned. There is good reason why a lot of blogs do not change their layout or add much by way of new features during their life cycle. We aren’t all techies.

    Another thing about blogging, especially if you take like I have the earlier definition seriously is, you have to be constantly working on it. If you are looking to set up a blog because you think it will be great to receive free rum and free entry to Rum Events etc then be prepared to play the long game. In fact you are better off just forgetting about this as you should be focusing on writing a good blog and gaining a sizeable following. The rest will come if you put the work in.

    Now, some bloggers the aforementioned Ralfy is one such blogger who steadfastly refuse samples. Some do this to remain independent and impartial, such as Ralfy. Others feel that the 2,3 and 5cl samples routinely dished out by the “bigger” producers are not sufficient to base an opinion on. In the main though such bloggers are a rarity because it can get very tempting to take up offers of free rum.

    I did start off with a view to not accepting samples. This is quite an easy thing to do early on. Especially if like me for the first 9 months you “fly under the radar” and remain anonymous.

    Now, in and ideal world the best websites by the best bloggers/writers etc would be the most viewed and most popular. Unfortunately, as with nearly every form of the arts the “best” do not always rise to the top.

    Another thing to consider if you are thinking of becoming a blogger is how do you get your site viewed? I’ve learned a few things about how search engines work and how you can increase your ranking with search engines so more people visit your site. However, you have to use whatever means necessary to get views on your site for all this to kick in. Search Engine Optimisation is a great way to ensure your website gets viewed. In basic terms Search Engine Optimisation is a way of “making” the likes of Google rank your website “higher” in its page ranking than other sites based on keywords and phrases.

    In addition to this you can also use Google Analytics to help with the ranking. This enables google to check how popular your website is and this can also help with the page ranking. Basically if you can get your site on the first page of a google search under popular keywords and phrases you are onto a winner.

    Advertising is obviously a quick way to get hits depending on your budget. To try and get a starter blog up to say 10,000 views per month I would imagine it costs a pretty penny.

    Thing is there is plenty of scope for “free advertising”. As well as setting up your online blog you will also need Social Media accounts. Believe me my traffic increased dramatically when I went public on Social Media in particular Facebook.

    There are a lot of Rum Groups on Facebook. I joined pretty much everyone I could find. At the time not many bloggers were doing what I did. Basically I shared a link to every new review I wrote. This clearly wasn’t to everyones “tastes” and a few of the older guard of Rum Bloggers (most of whoms blogs were at the time largely inactive or only very fleetingly updated) weren’t overly impressed with this “spamming” of the Rum Forums. Fuck em.

    However, only one or two of the group owners approached me requesting I remove my links or post less regularly. I noted this all down. Around a year later one of these group owners kindly informed me he had re-considered his decision and I could post some links to his group. My response was quite a way from being a yes.

    Without Facebook and to a lesser extent Twitter, Instagram and Pinterest I probably would have abandoned the blog as it simply would never have got enough hits to sustain my interest. As a blogger I spend around 5 to 6 hours per week on the site. Which may not sound a lot, but it is when you have a young family. It’s not really worth it if only 12 people are seeing a review..

    Some bloggers will tell you they aren’t bothered about the amount of hits they receive. I honestly don’t understand or see any logic in this. I don’t spend all this time writing my blog for no-one to read it!

    Anyway, back to receiving samples. Now most of the very popular Spirits Review sites are helped by paid for advertising and as well as receiving samples from producers. They actually also get paid to feature beer, wines and spirits. These websites get visitor numbers, which any blogger is very unlikely to come close to achieving. You simply won’t get offered all the goodies they get.

    Until a blog starts to get visitors it will not get offered freebies. Some bloggers in particular those that use Instagram (rather than having a “proper” website for a blog), seem far more comfortable going out and asking for freebies. Now, unless you’ve already got links in the industry it is unlikely that any reputable or famous producers will be sending you any samples, even if you approach them.

    Initially, you are more likely to receive offers from smaller less established brands. It’s quite flattering at first and you’ll likely find it quite exciting especially your first “freebie”.

    Now I’ve never “disclosed” on the website if I have been sent anything by the producer, distributor or brand ambassador. A number of review websites have disclaimers which disclose that they will always reveal when they have received free samples. The disclaimer always includes the fact that the review will not be influenced by the sample.

    Which as far as I am concerned the very fact you feel the need to reveal this suggests to me it already has been. You doth protest too much methinks.

    If anyone thinks this is an unfair assessment always look for a bloggers lowest score. Contrast this with their scoring scale. A lot of bloggers use the 50-100 scale. Yet most might as well be using 75-100. Now whilst a score of 75 on this scale is pretty much “average” it really doesn’t look as bad at 5/10. You’ll find that most rums scored around this mark are often noted as being good mixers. Even when they are clearly priced above this and trying to position themselves as “Premium”.

    Now bloggers have a lot of reasons why they don’t use the full breadth of their scoring system. The most popular one is that they do not review “inferior” (in their eyes) or budget rum. My blog wasn’t set up to give other Rum Geeks a hard on or to make others green with envy over my latest sample of some 25 year old Caroni that was sold out over 10 years ago.

    I’ll review anything that has “rum” on it. The only way to stop people buying rubbish is to tell them what is rubbish and why. Some people are on tight budgets. They may only have £20 to spend on a bottle of rum. Now at this price point they can certainly buy more bad rum than good. If they aren’t told otherwise. There are plenty of good rums available at every price point.

    A lot of bloggers don’t use the lower end of the scoring system because they do not want to risk their flow of samples ending. So you will see quite a few reviews were relationships and often friendships are revealed. Sooner or later this relationship will be tested by a not so good quality product. It can be interesting how creative some reviews can be of fairly poor spirits. Is it really a Premium Mixer or is it not really just a terrible sip?

    Of course no blogger will ever admit to an “enhanced” review. I’ve never written anything other than the truth in a review. I would say were this ever to  be challenged I could present a more credible amount of evidence than many other bloggers. Some bloggers have went from blogging to working in the industry. Good luck but once you have crossed that line your impartiality and independence will always be questioned. You can’t really remain as a truly independent rum blogger, certainly not a reviewer if you have financial interests in certain brands or producers.

    For the record I do receive samples from producers. I do review them. I get them fairly regularly. However, I keep most of my interactions with producers and third parties (such as The Whisky Exchange and Master of Malt) at arms length. There is certainly no guarantee of a favourable review. Not a chance. No sample review is submitted to them prior to publication.

    I do have a policy for samples though and I no longer accept anything I have experience of being poor quality or questionable rum.

    Captain Morgan Jack O Blast Spiced Rum Review by the fat rum pirateA good few years back an advertising agency approached me wanting to send me a sample of Captain Morgan Pumpkin Blast in time for Halloween. As the agency was based in California, I didn’t expect them to send the sample. I gave my name and address and forgot all about it.

    Around a week later, a package arrived inside was a70cl bottle of Captain Morgan Pumpkin Blast. This was accompanied by an email suggesting ways I could promote the “rum” on Social Media. I received two further emails over the next few days outlining signature serves and some hashtags etc to use in my Social Media posts.

    I decided to get in touch with the agency. I explained to them about the site and how I hadn’t expected the sample and I would write a review but it might not be very favourable.

    To my surprise I got an email back around half an hour later. The agency apologised for not reading more of my site. They did however say I was fine to publish a review even if I hated the rum as it was all good publicity. I never got offered any more samples.

    Now, of course a review is just one mans opinion or in some instances the concensus of a couple of writers on a writing team. The biggest get out clause whenever a Blogger or a Rum Enthusiast has his opinion of a rum questioned is “Taste is subjective”. Now as far as your average non-blogger is concerned, I can live with this. However, I do not buy into the idea that someone who has set themselves up as Rum Blogger should use such a lame excuse.

    Now, I am not saying that as a Rum Blogger I am in anyway an Expert on Rum. I always laugh when bloggers add such monikers in their About Information or make claims to be anything other than a humble blogger. I’ve never felt the need to big myself up and I would prefer others to give me any such acclaim. Though I suspect most of the names I will be called might not fall into this category.

    However, if you set up a blog and start reviewing rum you are suggesting to me that you have some basic understanding of rum. To me you have gone beyond the “I like the taste” level of critique. I’m not expecting an expert opinion or viewpoint. Just something a bit beyond “Kraken is really sweet and smooth I love it – the best rum in the world”Kraken Rum

    Now I am 100% not saying that how much you enjoy a rum shouldn’t influence your review. It should be a big part of your review.  Of course it should no dispute there.

    BUT I personally think when you are reviewing a spirit as diverse as rum your own very personal tastes have to be offset slightly against a number of factors.

    Early on in my rum drinking “career” I tried a couple of Rhum Agricole’s. A La Mauny VO and Saint James Royal Ambre. I remember reading about Rhum Agricole but I didn’t really believe that it would be quite as different from molasses based “Industrial” rum as it was.

    I thought it was some kind of repulsive joke when I tried the La Mauny VO for the first time. In fact I thought my bottle had gone bad, been corked or something. It was completely foul. Although I didn’t review the La Mauny VO (I could barely stomach it, even with cola) I did try another cheaper agricole Saint James Rhum Ambre, which I did review.

    The review is still on the site – I am currently in the process of reviewing the 40% and 45% ABV versions, and will replace the current review. The review is a display of utter ignorance and arrogance. The ramblings of a fool. It’s awful.

    Put simply I hadn’t put the time in with Rhum Agricole to understand it. It is very important when reviewing any rum to try and get an understanding of what the producer is trying to achieve. If you review a White Unaged Overproof from Jamaica, don’t review it expecting it to be a elegant sipping experience best paired with a cigar. Don’t rate a cheap white rum based solely on it’s sippability. It’s not been released for that. You wouldn’t rate your Nissan Micra on it’s ability around Brands Hatch but as a functional short distance run around, it serves a perfectly good purpose.

    If you don’t “like” certain styles of rum then take this into account. If you are reviewing rum across the whole diverse spectrum of rum producing nations – you will encounter styles you prefer. Approach a rum review with an understanding of what the rum is likely to taste like rather than what you might want from rum.

    Rhum Agricole still isn’t my preferred style of rum but I can now recognise when I have a good example, of such a rum in my glass. I’ve read up on it, asked Agricole lovers and producers to get a better understanding. We are all always learning no matter how knowledgable we think we are.

    I’ll make a little caveat at this stage, whilst I am open to all styles of rum/rhum I do not consider additive laden rum to be a category in it’s own right. I do not accept the likes of Plantation’s view that the double ageing and use of sugar syrup is a “house style” as some have suggested. I still judge their rums on those against others from the nation of origin. So Plantation Xaymaca is judged against other Jamaican rums.

    In general when it comes to sweetened rums I take a dim view of the practice. As more often than not they are up to other deceptive practices. They usually offer little by way of tangible information on their products. There are no minimum age statements or any guarantee of quality. I don’t really afford them any leeway the additives usually just kill the “rum”.

    I think it’s also important to try and get some decent information on how a rum is produced. We don’t need as much information as some might advocate. Method of distillation, age of the rum(s), barrels aged in and where aged are all important factors. Along with this I would also say price has to be factored in to any overall score. It is a very significant factor. More so than many might suggest.

    Saint James Royal Ambre 45% Rum Review by the fat rum pirateNow I know some people will be a little aghast that I am even daring to suggest that your review shouldn’t relate totally to how much you enjoy the spirit. I strongly believe it should but I think a more basic understanding of what is in front of you is merited, if you are going to review as a blogger. If the rest of the world thinks Rhum JM XO is a great example of Rhum Agricole but you think it’s pish because you “don’t like Agricole”.

    Probably best parking that review. You run the risk of looking (like I did) like an uninformed prat.

    Anyway should your blog “take off” you’ll likely receive a few invites to Rum Events and Rum Festivals. Most of these take place in London. So whilst I am unable to attend many of these events, I also avoid the obligation in many cases. There are plenty bloggers and industry hangers on who will gladly attend the opening of a crisp packet. You then just have to await the gushing praise for the brand over the coming days accompanied by various soundbites parroting the Brand Ambassador. All very tedious.

    When I attend Rum Festivals I go as a grateful participant. I always make a point of thanking the organisers for any free entry they may have granted. For the last few Rum Festivals I haven’t worn any “identifying” clothing. It can however be difficult to try and pretend to be a punter when people know or recognise me.

    I try not to tell people I’m a blogger when I visit a stand. A lot of people from most etablished brands know me but if I go unrecognised I do not mention being a blogger. I will chat and try the producers rum. If I like them and what they are doing I will hand them a card. Especially if they are a small producer doing something interesting. Unfortunately, you don’t tend to hear back very often from these brands. With so many rums out there I often lose track or forget who I have met.

    As a blogger Rum Festivals are a good way of getting a better perspective of the market. It is easy for a Rum Enthusiast to think the “Rum World” are all drinking Foursquare Exceptional Cask Series, Hampden DOK or Independent Demerara Rum bottlings. Even at London Rum Festival, where a considerable number of people with Caribbean heritage attend, there are still a lot of casual Kraken and Coke drinkers and people thinking “smooth” sweetened junk like Don Papa is great rum.Hydrometer Tests by the fat rum pirate

    As far as the rum blogging scene is concerned it has changed dramatically. A number of more established Rum Blogs have fallen by the wayside or are simply hardly ever updated. New blogs have sprouted up with huge dedication and enthusiasm….for a few months. Before being mothballed or going on a break.

    It is perhaps more fragmented than before, with very different views and perspectives. Which is a reflection very much of how the Rum Scene in general has “split” since additives were exposed.

    The next few years will be very interesting.

     

  • Cachaca Doministro Prata

    Cachaca Doministro Prata Rum Review by the fat rum pirateCachaca Doministro Prata. When Carlos Atia retired from his position as “Minister of the Federal Court of Accounts” in 1998, he already had an idea of how he would occupy himself in retirement.

    For many years Carlos had been producing cachaca on a very small scale and gifting it to friends and family. The cachaca was of such a quality that they would often ask when they would receive another bottle of “Cachaca do Ministro”.

    So with this in mind Carlos decided to upscale his production and become a formally recognised cachaca producer. So he registered Cachaca Doministro with the National Institute of Industrial Property and also with the Ministry of Agriculture, in Brasil. Carlos sadly died aged 81 in 2019 but the brand he started remains in production.

    Cahcaca Doministro Prata is produced in Goias state. The state is noted for producing a lighter, cleaner style of cachaca than some other cachaca producing states in Brasil.

    This cachaca has been produced from freshly harvested sugar cane grown on the estate near the distillery on a Copper Alembic Pot Still. Following distillation is has been aged for 1 year in Jequitiba barrels. Jequitiba is a Brasilian hardwood. It is not a very porous wood and as a result it imparts very little colour to cachaca. As you can see from the photos this is a crystal clear cachaca.Cachaca Doministro Prata Rum Review by the fat rum pirate

    Since 1998 the brand has grown and now has 8 cachacas available. For further information on the brand please take a look at their website. This cachaca is available to buy direct from the website and is priced at $R56 (works out at around £7)

    As usual (apologies for this) you’ll probably not be able to pick up a bottle of this without visiting Brasil. Although the brand has only been active since 1998 they still use the more “traditional” presentation for their cachaca.

    So we have a tall bottle with a very short neck and a gold coloured screw cap. The bottle label is understated and a little old fashioned but it serves the purpose and is easily identifiable as cachaca.

    The nose on Cachaca Doministro is quite light. It has a sweet aromas of sugar cane, vanilla and a slight note of citrus juice. Further nosing reveals some more floral notes and a very slight hint of white pepper. It’s a very clean and crisp nose.

    Sipped Cachaca Doministro Prata has a bit more of a woody profile than I was expecting from the lighter nose. I’m getting a good hit of woody spice and vanilla on the initial sip. It’s very smooth and clean and easy to sip. Not at all rough with minimal alcohol burn.

    It’s quite dry as well so the mid palate tends to fade out from the iniCachaca Doministro Prata Rum Review by the fat rum piratetial burst of wood spice and vanilla into a gentler flavour but it doesn’t offer much more in terms of flavour development. Some of the floral notes on the nose hang around for a little while and it gently fades out.

    Finish wise as a result it’s pretty short overall. That said it is very dry and refreshing and would work well as a palate cleanser.

    It’s not the fullest flavour I’ve ever encountered in a white cachaca but it does have a nice balance to it and whilst finish wise it’s a bit short – it’s still not a bad spirit to sip.

    Mixed it is surprisingly more robust than you might think and it makes a really nice Caiprinha. Not bad at all but not the best I have ever encountered.

     

  • An Interview with Mads Heitmann – Romhatten.dk

    MADS1The Danish Speaking world has one of the better Rum websites to boast about.  With reviews, articles and its own forum Romhatten is impressive and its design is sleek and modern.

    A lot of websites could take a lot of pointers from the site.  Unfortunately for English speakers such as myself the site doesn’t automatically translate too well from Danish into English.  However, with a bit of persistence it is possible to pick up on the meaning of most of Mads’ pieces especially his reviews.

    Rum is very popular in Denmark and Mads is an individual who is very active in spreading the word in his home country, organising rum tastings and other events.

    Curious about the popularity of rum in Denmark and always keen to hear from other “rummies” I decided to ask Mads a few questions which he very kindly answered for me.  Enjoy, there are some cracking answers here and I’m sure a lot of you will nod in agreement.

    1.  What inspired you to set up the Romhatten Group?

    The “Romhatten Forum” group on Facebook is an offspring of Romhatten.dk. Romhatten.dk is a Danish website that I formed in 2010. The website only deals with rum and is based on the rum reviews that I make. I also write articles on rum for the web page

    I set up the Facebook group in 2012 in order to gather all the users of romhatten.dk. On this platform, the Danish rum lovers can meet and talk rum. It’s a great forum where we all can learn more about rum – information is what it’s all about.

    In 2015, the website has so far received over 80,000 hits and some of these users are looking to the forum on facebook. The forum has almost  2,000 members. Romhatten.dk also has a facebook page which so far has over 5,500 likes.

    FYI: The word “Romhatten” is a Danish word that I have made up. The word covers a person who is crazy about rum. An English version could for example be “Rum Loony”.

    2.  How popular is rum in Denmark?

    Rum is very popular in Denmark. My interest of rum began in 2007 and since that time I have seen a huge development in rum in Denmark. Rum was in 2007, something that people in the general public did not consider to be something you could drink neat as with cognac and whisky, but that is no longer the case. Today, when I travel around in Denmark I see that people have accepted rum as a sipping spirit.

    Rum has found a foothold in Denmark. In the Danish wine and liquor stores, rum takes up more and more space on the shelves and many of these shops rely more and more on selling rum – they follow the increasing demand. Many shops are experiencing that sales of rum have long overtaken whiskey, cognac and gin. I have spoken with several owners of liquor stores who say that when they sell ten bottles of spirits then seven of them are rum where cognac, whiskey, gin, vodka and tequila are share the last three bottles. It is very impressive!

    However, the sweeter rum are the most popular rum in Denmark. The bestsellers are Ron Zacapa and Ron Diplomatico but also Oliver & Oliver’s products (Puntacana Club, Opthimus and Quorhum) sell very well.

    3.  How expensive is alcohol in Denmark? Prices here in the UK are pretty high compared to other EU countries especially France and Spain but Scandinavia is notorious for its high alcohol prices and strict alcohol legislation. Is this the case in Denmark as well?

    It is not the case in Denmark. Denmark is an alcohol friendly country when compared to Norway and Sweden. In Denmark, we don’t have the same state-owned alcohol monopoly as Sweden – in Sweden it’s called “Systembolaget”. In Denmark, we have a free trade in beer, wine and spirits. The prices are a little high, but is overall in line with those seen in England, I believe. Due to the high prices we unfortunately see that many Danes go to Germany to buy wine, spirits and beer. On the other hand, we also see that many Swedes buying their alcohol in Denmark.

    4.  What are the aims of the Romhatten group? Do you have any views which members are expected to be in agreement on?ROMHATTEN

    Maybe some more events for the members. We have already held a series of events in Denmark with Skotlander Spirits, where all the users of Romhatten were invited to a free tasting event. All over Denmark (in Aarhus, Aalborg, Odense and Copenhagen) rum lovers showed up to select Skotlander Spirits next rum. All fully booked events and all in all 500 participants. Five different blends were showcased and the result of the votes was this Skotlander Cask Rum. It’s the users of Romhatten.dk who selected the blend for this rum – I am very proud of that.

    5.  Have you organised any events etc under the Romhatten name? (I note what looks like a rum tasting event on the site)

    I started making rum tastings in connection with Romhatten.dk in 2012 and since then I have hosted about 100 tastings around Denmark. On Romhatten.dk I offer rum tastings for private gatherings and businesses and since 2012 I have held tastings for both large and small crowds – it’s has so far ranged between 4 and 120 persons.

    Besides the rum tastings where one can book me to come and talk about rum, I arrange events to which people can buy tickets. These events include both tastings where I myself do the tasting, but also tastings in cooperation with rum brands. This year I have among other things, held tastings in collaboration with Ron Zacapa and later this year there will also be tastings in collaboration with Sprit & Co. who represents Ron Diplomatico in Denmark. Back in 2013, I also had the honor of arranging a master class with John Georges from Angostura, who was visiting Denmark. The attendance of these tastings are good – the events are usually sold out.

    6.   On a more personal level how did your own Rum Journey begin?

    I had my first sip of “premium rum” back in 2007. At the time I was drinking Bacardi Black with cola at the high school parties, but decided to try two bottles in the more high end category. Without knowing anything about rum I chose a bottle of Matusalem 15 Solera and a bottle of El Dorado 12 Years Old Rum and I was immediately hooked.

    This year I publish a book on rum. The book will be called “Rombogen” (The Rum Book) and is put out by Politikens Forlag. As I drank my first glass El Dorado Rum in 2007, I had probably never dreamed that I would go and write a book on rum. It’s a little crazy to think about actually!

    MADS27.  What rums do you find yourself going back to time and time again? What rums can’t you be without?

    My first rum love was El Dorado Rum from Guyana, and what is it they say about first loves? However, I am becoming more and more nerdy over the years. Currently, I am very interested in the independent bottlers. Bottlers like Bristol Spirits, Silver Seal, Velier and Berry’s Own Selection are just some of the bottlers that I think is very exciting. The other day I bought a Bristol Classic Rum distilled in 1985 at the old Versailles Still. When I find something like this in a liquor store it’s like finding an old treasure. I just have to have it!

    That said, my rum collection (which now counts well over 150 bottles) always holds a few editions of El Dorado Rum – the 15 and 21 expressions are very nice Demerara rums. El Dorado’s 25-year vintage edition of 1980 and 1986 stands out for me as the ultimate rum – a rum which I unfortunately only have tasted three times… so far.

    8.  And on another notes are there any rums or producers/bottlers you actively avoid buying from? Any reasons?

    There is products on the market that I think is less interesting than others, of course. And there are also rum products, which I not consider to be “real rum” but more as a result of a consumers market which demands certain things. You will find these products that I refer to in the category of rum because of lack of regulation. These products should perhaps rather be found in other spirit categories and not in the rum category as such.

    9.  Do you have a signature drink or cocktail you could share with us?

    I love cocktails and I want to be able to taste the liquor used in my cocktail. I am especially fond of the Rum Sour made with El Dorado 15 Years Old Rum. It’s a simple cocktail that always impresses guests – I usually use this recipe:

    You need the following:

    50 mL El Dorado 15 Years Old Rum

    50 mL lime juice

    1,5 tsp sugar

    1 egg white

    Angostura Bitters

    1. Put all the ingredients except the angostura into a shaker with LOTS of ice. Shake enthusiastically. Pour it into an old-fashioned glass.

    2. Add a couple of drops of Angostura bitter on top. A mouthwatering cocktail!

    10.  And finally where do you see the Rum Category going in the 5 years? Where would you like to see it going?

    Of course I hope that the popularity of rum continues to rise and with it, I also hope that the market is developing in the right direction. I would like to see more independent bottlers in the future, such as the newly established Compagnie Des Indes, which for the Danish market has made a series of single cask bottlings – delicious stuff. Bottlers sending rum on the market where the distillery, year of distillation, year of bottling, etc. is known is always exciting and it is not at least something that I feel that the rum category currently are missing. More products with more transparency.

    And there you have it a very interesting and informative interview with a very interesting and driven individual.  Cheers Mads!