Lamb’s Demerara Navy Rum – Bottled 1970’s

Lamb's Demerara Navy rum 70's bottling Rum review by the fat rum pirate Lamb’s Demerara Navy Rum. I don’t know exactly when this was bottled. Research has shown that this style of bottle was available in the 1970’s (and before). The UK largely stopped using their own “proof” calculation in 1980 and began showing the ABV rather than the proof. Whilst this is noted as 70 proof on the bottle, it’s the old “British” style proofing so it translates to 40% ABV. The same ABV Lamb’s Navy Rum is today.

I thought it might make an interesting post to compare and contrast the Lamb’s Demerara Navy Rum, that we got in the 70’s with the Lamb’s Navy Rum we find on our shelves today. This also fits in nicely for Black Tot Day as well which was of course 31st July 1970. So we are fast approaching its 50th anniversary.

First up, for all Lamb’s presence in the UK market and a rich history going back many years I cannot find any evidence – even on their own website that they did actually supply rum to the British Royal Navy.

Even though this is just a miniature Lamb’s didn’t introduce their distinctive hexagonal bottles until the 1980’s. The presentation of this rum is quite different with a more sparse colour scheme. I particularly like the heavy plastic and metal screw cap with “Lambs Navy Rum” printed into it. Though it was a bit of a bugger to unscrew.

In the glass Lamb’s Demerara Navy rum is a dark almost burnt brown with orange edges. The nose is the first surprise. I am getting a lot of quite meaty, beefy notes of Marmite and Bovril. Which is quite odd.and not what I was expecting. I did acquire this miniature only very recently at auction, so I cannot really account for how it has been stored. It also smells quite vinegar heavy and altogether just a little odd.

Beneath the sour vinegar and more meaty notes I can detect some more familiar Demerara notes of raisin, coffee and a very definite hit of aniseed.Lamb's Demerara Navy rum 70's bottling Rum review by the fat rum pirate

Sipping this rum I am taken by the lack of sweetness in the rum. It is quite bitter and very heavy on the aniseed notes. Quite a lot of fennel seed in there as well. This is a much less “sweet” style of rum than the one which presents itself on our shelves at the moment.

It’s not a hugely complex rum and the sip is certainly better than the nose – which was really odd. I may well have an off bottle”. Though to be fair it doesn’t taste all that bad, it just smells a bit funny. A little on the one-dimensional side of things though. Bitter burnt toffee and a touch of aniseed with some sharp sweet alcohol is about as far as this rum goes. It’s not awful but its a little bit, meh. I’m thinking Port Mourant still and maybe the Versailles. It’s interesting that this is just a Demerara rum as Lamb’s is noted of being a blend of 18 Caribbean rums way back when Alfred Lamb stated blending it. Nowadays I understand it is a blend of Caribbean rums from various different islands.

Mixing Lamb’s Demerara Navy Rum is quite an underwhelming experience as well. It’s pretty plain and safe, though the odd slightly meaty aroma returns. Drink wise it doesn’t stand up to the cola all that well and doesn’t  really do a great deal. It makes a passable rum and cola but it is nowhere near the calibre of other Demerara rums such as Wood’s or El Dorado 8. Even Skipper has a bit more oomph than this and Pusser’s beats it to a pulp.

It is much less sweet than the raisin and coffee/burnt caramel heavy notes of the current bottling but I can’t say I have much of a preference over either. Both are pretty Lamb's Demerara Navy rum 70's bottling Rum review by the fat rum pirateone dimensional and fairly bland in their own way. The newer bottling is sweeter but equally no show stopper.

Often it is said rum isn’t as good as it was in the past. I can safely declare that in this instance the passage of time hasn’t really changed things. Lamb’s was bang average in the 1970;s and its bang average now.

An interesting little “rarity” to review for Black Tot Day but not one which I’ll be rushing out to buy. There is the odd full size bottle of this available at around £180 if you hunt around. This may interest a collector but I’m very much about the drinking side of things.

Up Spirits! I think I’ll stick to the Pusser’s next year……

Similar Posts

  • When is Rum not a Rum?

    10 Essential Bottles of RumRecently there was a debate at Tales of the Cocktail.  The debate centered around “When is rum not a rum?”.

    Basically it was a discussion between those who add sugar (and/or other additives) and those who are very much against the practice.  This got me thinking about a subject which is very close to my heart.

    The overall standard and practices used by professional and non-professional spirits writers.

    Reasons for “Blogging”

    When I set up this blog back in 2014 I did it for a few reasons.

    My first reason was a way of documenting and remembering my experiences with rum.  It would be for my own enjoyment and reflection in years to come.  It was a way of keeping those bottles of rums safe somewhere.  Without actually physically having to keep them all.  Much to my wife’s relief.

    My second reason was the lack of regularly updated or dedicated Rum Review websites.  Compared to Whisky – Rum really does have very little presence on the net.  I felt that if I produced a website, it would actually get looked at.  Rather than become one of many thousands that are largely ignored in the Whisky world.

    My third and final reason was linked to my second reason.  I felt as a consumer first and foremost, some of the advice and guidance being handed out on some of these websites was questionable.  That is being kind.  I also noticed a lot of positive reviews and very few negative ones.

    One of the first things I noticed about the Rum Community when I “joined up” and published the site back in 2014, was the friendliness.  A number of other bloggers were keen to welcome me.  The mantra “rum is fun” was very much in place.

    This may not seem a bad thing and in many ways it’s not.  Unfortunately it is this very mantra which continues to drag the category down.  It is partly why rum continues to be a bit of a joke in the spirits world.  It’s a party mixer to get drunk with.  With everyone being friendly and welcoming it seemed no questions were being asked.  On any level.  No one seemed to want to rock the boat.

    The Rum world suffers, as most spirits do from global multi nationals marketing and pricing strategies.  These multi nationals can pay to enter all manner of competitions (even set some up theselves).  Then market their rums quite freely as Gold Medal winning rum etc.  Some brands have become so intrinsically linked to certain Rumfests that it is difficult to take the awards seriously.  They can also demand premium shelf space in stores and even prevent competitors rums from being sold or displayed in stores or bars.

    Angostura 5 Year Old Rum Review by the fat rum pirateIndustry Samples

    These companies are also free to give out samples to the industry.  Now bloggers receiving samples and their impartiality is a private matter.  I personally don’t think it is possible to be 100% impartial.  Others have suggested they can.  What is clear though once you start scratching beneath the surface of all these reviews, is how bad some of the sample led ones are.

    Take for example Papa’s Pilar Dark 24.  I slammed this as it has little resemblance to rum. Run a quick google search and it will draw up a whole host of positive reviews.  Read and compare the notes.  Ask yourself – how many of these “experts” are really knowledgeable about rum?

    Which may sound rather big-headed of me.  Who the hell am I to be calling out bad reviews? Well, I don’t even believe I am calling out bad reviews.  I’m calling out marketing.  A lot of these so called reviews are not reviews.  The reviewer hasn’t spent much time with their promotional bottle.  They’ve been given some marketing blurb to re-gurgitate and they have set about their task.  Most of the time they don’t even score the rum. They just give a whole host of nice sounding tasting notes.  Which to be fair you could easily do with most rum – good or bad.

    The practice stinks and the average consumer deserves a lot better than to be duped by such nonsense.

    Hydrometer Tests

    Despite the very real situation back in 2014 that rum was being altered and adulterated very few website owners acknowledged the fact.  Even fewer had adopted the Hydrometer Test Method, as advocated by Johnny Drejer of Drecon.dk.

    imagePersonally, once I realised how simple and inexpensive these tests were it struck me as a no brainer to test all the rums I reviewed.  Why? Because you can never know enough about rum and you will rarely be told by the industry.

    It makes sense to me to understand as much about the spirit of rum as possible.  Granted the Hydrometer Tests do not tell everything but they do offer an invaluable insight.

    Now some had spoke out about his adulteration.  Perhaps the most (in)famous of these is Capn Jimbo of the Rum Project.  Unfortunately the Capn was overzealous and rather repetitive in his criticisms of the practice.  Rather than influence or engage he basically just pissed a lot of people off.  He did and continues to make a lot of very good points.  Unfortunately he has influenced too few people.  In many respects he has probably caused more people to dig their heels in against his opinions.

    As I write, now in 2016 more Rum Reviewers are commenting on added sugar and conducting Hydrometer Tests on their collections.  However, a lot remain very quiet on the subject.

    So you might well still be wondering “When is rum not a rum?”.  Well it’s certainly a very difficult and contentious question.

    From my viewpoint. I am someone who wants to help people make good choices when buying rum. So perhaps to answer the question of “When is rum not a rum?” we need to approach it from a slightly different angle.

    What is Good Rum?

    The Real McCoy 12 year old rum review by the fat rum pirateRum is a distillate derived from sugar cane or sugar cane juice.  It is distilled in either pot or column stills.  To remain a rum it should not be distilled to the point whereby it becomes ethyl alcohol or neutral spirit.  Typically this is at around 95% but many have suggested it should be lower to maintain the character of the spirit – around 85% maximum.

    Once the rum comes off the still it should be aged in good quality, empty (not unwashed) oak barrels.  It can be matured in a variety of barrels and a “finish” can be applied – again in barrels which do not contain other spirits or alcohols.

    Once aged for the necessary period deemed by the distiller the rum should be bottled and/or blended with other rum.

    If you have distilled and aged the rum in this manner you will have a good quality spirit called Rum.

    It really should be that simple.  Any flavour beyond the original distillate will be provided by the maturation period in the oak. Simple.

    If you are reviewing rum then you should be able to identify rum which has been produced in this way.  You should be familiar with the “true spirit” you are writing about.  You should over time be able to identify tastes, flavours and smells that have perhaps been added.  This is the very tricky part.

    Benchmarks

    I always use benchmarks of good rums for the majority of  rum styles.  These might not necessarily be the best rum in the style but they are all of a certain standard.  They represent a spirit which is at the very least “good”.

    For Jamaican and Bajan rum this has proved a very uncomplicated choice.  Pretty much anything from Appleton Estate and Foursquare are good starters.  For more “funky” Jamaican rums then J Wray and Nephews White Overproof offers a good example of that “niche”.  At the same time Hampden Gold or Smith & Cross offer  an introduction to high ester Jamaican rum.

    For Bajan rum I can also call upon Mount Gay Extra Old and Cockspur Fine Rum as solid examples of the style.  One a sipper one an inexpensive mixer.

    For Navy Rum it’s fairly straightforward and all must be judged against the standards set by Pusser’s Gunpowder proof (54.5% ABV).

    As examples of white rum I use Don Q Cristal, Charman’s Reserve White Label and Appleton White.

    Unfortunately due to the amount of adulteration and unspoken of practices in rum it gets rather tricky after this.

    El Dorado 15 Year Old Special Reserve Rum by the fat rum pirate reviewDemerara Rum – It’s quite difficult to get unsweetened Demerara especially at the lower mixing end of things.  As a result my standards for Demerara include both sweetened and unsweetened.  El Dorado 8 and 15 for sweetened rums.  Woods Navy Rum (it is purely Demerara despite being sold as Navy rum) and Cadenheads Classic Rum for the unsweetened rums.  If I am reviewing an expensive Demerara around the £100 mark for example then Velier’s rums will set the benchmark.

    Cuban/Spanish Style Rum – I tend to use Havana Club 7 and Seleccion de Maestro as benchmarks for this style.

    Premium Rum – I use Premium rum as an example of a style but in reality it is more adultered rum than anything else.  I’m not keen on this “style” of rum.  Ron Zacapa and Diplomatico Reserva Exclusiva are examples of this style.  It’s difficult really to see these kinds of spirit as rum.

    As you can see it does get difficult and confusing.  I can’t even go into every style of rum as I would be on all day!  It’s bit of minefield really.

    Will I downscore a rum solely based on added sugar (or other suspected additives?

    My answer is that I won’t mark the rum down solely because it has added sugar.  However if the added sugar detracts from what would have been the original spirit in a negative way.  The best example I can think of is Plantation Jamaica 2001.  In that the original taste, flavour and texture of the distillate has been lost – then yes, I will down score it.

    Likewise if a rum is obscured so much by added sugar and additives that it displays no or little resemblance to rum – it won’t score well as a rum.  I’m reviewing rum not liqueurs.

    Ron ZacapaWhich brings me round to my final point.  I mentioned already that when reviewing rum you can never know enough about the spirit.  Knowledge of the spirit of rum and how it should taste is key.  It’s vital to understand and at least try to determine when a rum has been adulterated.

    It Tastes Nice…..

    In my opinion it is simply not acceptable to review rum based solely on something tasting nice.  To many this may sound a little strange.  Surely reviewers should review based on how they enjoy the rum?

    I would say yes undoubtedly reviewers should base their opinions on how much they enjoy the rum.  If however they cannot taste or determine any rum in the bottle then they should make this abundantly clear.  As mentioned already rum is a very diverse spirit.  Some of this diversity is due to production methods, climate, ageing, blending etc and some of this diversity is due to additives to the base spirit.  If these additives detract from the original base spirit – it should be noted.

    This is a very tricky area for a rum reviewer.  I will state now that I cannot 100% vouch that I could identify every rum which has been altered.  I doubt I could even vouch 90%.  However, what I am trying to do is learn and understand the true spirit of rum.  I can’t test for additives such as glycerine but I am learning how it feels in the mouth.

    What I can do however is recognise what should be present in certain rums.  If a rum has been aged for any prolonged period then it should exhibit some oak, particularly on the nose.  It then comes down to understanding the various styles a Jamaican rum should be more punchy and funky – big notes of bruised banana and other overripe fruits.

    A Bajan rum when done well should be nicely balanced with vanilla and gentle oaked notes.  Rums of a Spanish origin (Cuban rums for example) should be lighter more delicate with often a tobacco’ed note.  Unfortunately many Spanish style rums do have wine/vermouth etc added to them.  Cuban rum by law is permitted to have 20 g/L of sugar added.  Which again makes things more difficult.  No one ever said it was easy.

    If rum continues to be heralded because it is sweet and tastes nice – step forward Diplomatico Reserva Exclusiva, Ron Zacapa, Pyrat XO and Ron Millonario XO then the category will not move forward.

    Holsten Pils Dennis LearyThe whole “smooth and sweet” basis of reviewing rum needs to stop.  Rum is not sweet because it is distilled from sugar cane.  It is exactly the same as any other spirit.  The sugar turns to alcohol.  Didn’t anyone pay attention to Dennis Leary’s 1990’s Holsten Pils adverts?

    If a rum is smooth and sweet – then I want to know why.  Rum can be sweet.  When finishes are applied to rum – in the case of Foursquare’s Port Cask Finish.  It can also be relatively smooth.  However you are drinking (at least) 37.5% ABV liquor – if it doesn’t give you at least a little kick – there’s something up.

    Ron Millonario XO for example is not a smooth and sweet rum.  It is a sweetened and highly doctored “rum”.  The rum in this product is non-existent.  It’s been masked beyond all recognition.

    Any reviewer worth their salt should recognise this.  Unfortunately many either cannot or more worryingly choose not to.  I do not have anywhere near as much knowledge as I would like but I will continue to seek out information and improve, wherever possible.

  • Pusser’s 15 Year Old Rum 2018 Re-Blend

    Pusser's 15 Year Old 2018 Re Blend rum review by the fat rum piratePusser’s 15 Year Old Rum has been around for some time. (At least 15 years I can hear someone saying……) I first reviewed it a few years ago. I do intend to re-review some of the rums I have covered going forward. To be honest, Pusser’s 15 Year Old was one that would have had that treatment bestowed upon it anyway – miniatures of the rum are readily available. Which makes it easier on the wallet.

    The reason why I am re-reviewing Pusser’s 15 Year Old Rum, is not just because it has been given a pretty new bottle though.

    The juice inside the bottle has also changed. And now that is not just my opinion based on the bottle design changing (a sure flag to some that the liquid inside has changed, for reasons best known to them) Pusser’s have told us that.

    Bottle’s of the new Pusser’s 15 Year Old haven’t made it into the UK as yet. I would expect it to retail at around the £50-55 mark. The new blend has been bottled at 40% ABV. The original Pusser’s 15 Year Old was a blend of rums from Guyana and Trinidad.

    From the information I have been given the new blend contains only rum from Guyana. So we are of course talking of rums from Demerara Distillers Limited (DDL). I understand that more Pot Still rum from the Port Mourant Still is contained in this new blend (around 50%) with the rest coming from column stills. (I’ll update this when I get some firmer information)

    As you can see from the photo the bottle has been changed dramatically. It actually now looks like the cardboard sleeve that you occasionally found the original Pussers 15 Year Old housed in. It looks a bit classier and less gawdy. As with the previous bottling it is topped with a cork closure. Pretty much standard now for PremiuPusser's 15 Year Old 2018 Re Blend rum review by the fat rum piratem Rums.

    An issue with the original Pussers 15 Year Old was the readings using a Hydrometer. I tested and found around 29 g/L and Johnny Drejer noted a slightly lower reading and noted 24 g/L. This time around the re-blend has led to a considerable reduction with only 8 g/L this time around. I will re-test this when I get a full bottle.

    Now people have called Pusser’s out about additives before. They state on their site that their rums contain only natural colourings and flavourings. I guess sugar is one such flavouring.

    Also I have noticed similarity with this rum and some independent bottlings, that have tested positive for additives. DDL have through their brand ambassadors suggested that they coat their barrels with molasses and/or add some caramel into the rums as it ages. I would say the toffee/butterscotch note I get, would fit with a practice similar to this. There are a lot of rumours and stories about what DDL might or might not do. Do not taken anything noted here as gospel. I don’t know first hand. I make no claims to know. I am just sharing what others have told me. I will correct anything should it prove to be wrong.

    Another thing to note about Pussers 15 Year Old Rum is that it is not and never has been a 15 year old version of the Gunpowder proof rum. It’s always been a different rum to any of the others in the line up – which are the same rum at differing ABV’s.

    Anyway lets stop waffling on and get on with the review.

    In the glass Pusser’s 15 Year Old Rum is slightly darker and less tinged with red than what I remember from the previous incarnation. It’s a dark brown with some less obvious orange tinges.

    On the nose Pusser’s 15 Year Old Rum is a bit more rounded and balanced than the previous blend. It’s not quite as harsh and boozy. It’s more rounded and less aggressive.

    Notes of sweet licorice, milk chocolate raisins, sweet English breakfast tea and toffee. A distinctive Butterscotch type note that I have noticed before as mentioned earlier in the review. This is balanced by a stronger alcohol forward aniseed note which adds a little heft to the blend.

    It’s very similar to the previous offering in many respects but it does definitely have a more balanced nose.

    Sipped it is very flavourful. Again we treated to the licorice/aniseed notes of a Port Mourant rum. A style I enjoy very much. Toffee and milk chocolate add to the sweetness.

    Fortunately there is enough spicy warming oak and red wine like notes to make this a pretty complex sipping experience. There is an almost malty note to it like – at touch of roasted chestnuts.

    Pusser's 15 Year Old 2018 Re Blend rum review by the fat rum pirateThe mid palate leads into coffee and cinnamon. This is like a Christmas cake in a bottle. A very warming and very “seasonal” rum. Ideal for this time of year I must say.

    If you are looking for comparisons then Bristol’s Port Mourant Rum’s have similarities as does Plantation Guyana 2005.

    The finish is really good on this one as well. It’s the most woody part of the rum and the hit of oak spice, vanilla and orange zest is very pleasant and warming.

    This is a considerable upgrade on the previous 15 Year Old. It may not be quite as perfect as the Gunpowder proof but it is a very, very good rum.

    If you are looking for something with less sweetness, than say El Dorado 12 or 15 then you might wish to try this. I think most fans of Demerara rum will get some enjoyment out of this.

    A great upgrade.

     

     

  • M&S Gingerbread Rum

    M&S Gingerbread Rum review by the fat rum pirateMost supermarkets in the UK have their own brand spirits.  Marks and Spencer (or M&S for short), however do not do anything by halves.

    So rather than trot out just a standard white and dark Caribbean rum, they have actually got some pretty interesting rums on their shelves.

    The M&S Bajan Estate XO and Guatemalan Plantation rums have both been uncovered as being supplied by Cognac Ferrand’s rum blending wing Plantation Rum.  The information on this bottle which states the rum is produced and bottled in France leads me to believe that this Gingerbread flavoured offering is also from Plantation Rum.  NB – Since writing this review I have been informed by Nick Rodgers who works alongside Cognac Ferrand and Plantation Rum that is not a product produced by Plantation.

    This rum is widely available in most M&S supermarkets and comes in a 50cl bottle, no other bottle sizes are available.  It retails at around £14 per bottle and the ABV is 37.5% which is pretty respectable for a Spiced Rum.  The Gingerbread Rum is a blend of rums from Guyana and Trinidad.  It states it is made “with Ginger flavouring”.  Other than that there is little else to be gleaned from the bottle.

    Initially I thought the black seal meant that a corked enclosure lurked beneath, unfortunately this is not the case and instead it is a good quality screw cap.  The bottle itself is halfway to being a normal bar bottle and stubby bottle.  It slightly squat and rectangular almost in shape.  The presentation is a little lazy, a Pirate Ship sailing on the sea and all in all the presentation is pretty unremarkable.

    I’m struck by how light the rum is.  Whilst Trinidad rum is now mostly quite golden the guyanan rum in the is blend must also be pretty light.  This suggests to me that the rum base is pretty young.  Which is no great problem – I see little to be gained from Spicing well aged rums.  In the glass the Gingerbread rum is almost straw in colour.  It is very thin and not at all gloopy or viscous like some Spiced Rums can be.

    M&S Gingerbread Rum review by the fat rum pirateThe nose of this rum is a bit of a surprise.  It smells very much of young alcohol rather than the Gingerbread notes I was logically expecting.  It dies down after a little time in the glass, it’s a kind of Spiced Steeped Ginger like note.  I’m not really getting any bread or baking like notes with this one.  It’s not buttery or anything like that.  Just a bit boozy and quite fiery.  Alcoholic Ginger Beer like almost.

    A sip goes down okay but boy does this burn once it hits the pit of your stomach.  It does taste pretty rough but it actually goes down reasonably okay and doesn’t leave much of a alcohol burn in the mouth.  It saves it for the stomach though.  Ouch.

    It tastes a little strange.  It’s not synthetic but the Ginger flavouring does seem to be losing the battle with the young rum that forms its base.  As a sipper this is just to young to enjoy and for me it is just too sweet.  Rather than the Ginger flavour all I’m getting is young alcohol and some burnt sugar.  Sweet but with a little bitterness beneath.

    Mixed, which to be fair if it wasn’t for review purposes is how I would always drink this its better.  With cola it works well giving a nice smooth mixed drink which goes down a little too easily.  It’s still a little fiery but its definitely better and more easily enjoyed this way.  Upto now I’ve been referring to this as a Spiced Rum – I should change that it is actually a Flavoured Rum really.  It is supposed to taste like Gingerbread not be a rum that is Spiced with Ginger.  It’s not much of a difference but I think it is an important thing to consider when evaluating this rum.

    M&S Gingerbread Rum review by the fat rum pirateOverall this isn’t a bad flavoured rum.  It’s not particularly expensive and its not laced with vanilla like many of the cheaper Spiced rums are.  As a flavoured rum does it really taste or remind me of Gingerbread.  Well the Gingerbread I’ve enjoyed (and I do like Gingerbread) isn’t really like this.  It’s okay but it reminds me more of Ginger Beer than Ginger Bread.

    After more challenging or complex drinks (okay when you’re a bit tiddly) this makes a very passable “rum” and cola.  For my tastes its slightly too sweet and not really complex enough to hold my attention.  It does, however go down easily and is not something I would turn my nose up at.  It is still much better than some of the Vanilla laden spiced atrocities I have encountered and is certainly better than Bacardi’s Dingleberry Guava Fruit concoctions.

    You’d drink it and quite enjoy it at a party but you wouldn’t take it to a Rum Club meeting.  Little tip if you are in M&S looking for rum……avoid the own label Dark Rum.  One of the worst rums I have ever encountered!

    2 stars

     

     

     

  • Diplomatico Reserva Exclusiva

    Diplomatico Reserva Exclusiva. In many ways my days of reviewing these “kind” of rums should perhaps have been pretty much numbered.

    However, this website is now over 12 years old. Now I’ve seen plenty websites come and go in that time. So I’m having quite a good innings to use a cricketing (or rounders, sorry Baseball) analogy.

    During my 12 years of reviewing rum their have been quite a few changes. None which have impacted buying habits as much as I would have liked, unfortunately. Perhaps the most fundamental change in the past 10-15 years is the “truth” around additives in rum.

    El Dorado, Bacardi, Ron Zacapa and Diplomatico are all multi award winning rum producers who have been “found out”. Their Gold Medals tarnished in some peoples eyes due to their use of post distillation additives. In particular the use of sugar and glycerin (amongst others) to sweeten, soften and smooth out their rums.

    Perhaps the most noticeable effect of this has been the tightening of EU Rum Regulations. Previously up to a staggering 99 g/L of additives could be used and something could still be labelled “rum”. Anything over became a liqueur (not liquor!). This is the equivalent of over 25 level teaspoons of sugar.

    This has now been tightened to 20g/L (still around 5 level teaspoons per litre). Anything over this and below 100g/L is labelled a “Rum Based Spirit Drink” or words to that affect. See Don Papa and Bumbu for reference.

    Diplomatico had (prior to the EU changes) been recorded at around the 30/gL range in independent testing.

    So I was curious to see how Diplomatico have reacted to the EU ruling.

    I’d seen Diplomatico Reserva Exclusiva on sale on Amazon on numerous occasions over the past 18 months. I finally saw it drop down to just over £30. I figured that even with Amazon’s huge stock levels it was likely that by this time I would be getting a more recent bottling which would reflect any changes made post the EU 20g/L ruling.

    I’ve bought rum from Amazon before, which has been more than a Diplomatico Reserva Exclusiva rum review by the fat rum piratecouple of years old….just floating around in their warehouses.

    Upon arrival I was immediately taken by the cylinder the rum came in. Whilst in the photo it may look largely the same as the bottle, the colours are considerably darker and the overall quality of the print is much lower than the older bottle I got (some 13 years ago now!). It looks a bit screen-printed and cheap.

    That said the classic “postage stamp” stubby bottle with their mascot “Don Juancho” still proudly the centerpiece, still remains. Sadly the rear label (as pictured) spoils the aesthetic slightly with the Brown/Forman Import information and the calore content. I don’t suppose the HMRC sticker helps either…..

    I’ve stopped commenting so much on the bottle presentation but for these type of rums……..the presentation is still key. Very important for the pretty bottle brigade.

    Perhaps the most important thing about the presentation is that Diplomatico Reserva Exclusive is still labelled as a rum. So it must have under 20g/L of additives……..

    I’d noted on Rum Revelations that Ivar had measured this in 2022 and found only 18g/L of additives.

    I whipped out my Hydrometer and found the same reading – this is a 40% ABV reading and the Hydrometer shows 35% ABV suggesting 18.8 (I’lll call it 19) g/L of additives.

    So additives have been reduced (or changed to something less noticeable with the Hydrometer), I wonder how much effect this has had on the actual rum?

    Well lets visit the Diplomatico website and see what information they have on the rum in the bottle?

    Well, not a lot it is part of their “Tradition Range” and is bottled at 40% ABV. The rest is just marketing flannel, awards and tasting notes.

    So what is Diplomatico Reserva Exclusiva? I’m going to have to go with what Diffords Guide tell me but I make no claims that this is 100% factually correct. The information is pretty old as well

    20% light column distilled rum with 80% Pot Still Rum aged up to 12 years blended by Master Blender Tito Cordero who admits to adding a “little” cane sugar prior to blending.

    This is as good as we are going to get I am afraid. In fairness Diplomatico Reserva Exclusiva does not have an age statement nor does it hide behind any random fake number of any overly prominent XOXO style labelling. Even at its priciest it rarely comes in above £45 and hasn’t seen a dramatic price increase over the years.

    This rum was featured as one of The Lone Caner’s “Key Rums of the World” not because he particularly rates it. He gave it 74/100 on his 50 point scoring system 50-100 which is middling at best. He noted it as Key Rum more due to its omnipresence on the scene and the nuDiplomatico Reserva Exclusiva rum review by the fat rum piratember of times it is referenced and recommended. Not so much in more serious enthusiast/geek circles but amongst less serious more casual rum drinkers.

    So lets get down to it.

    In the glass the rum retains the dark hue of old. It is a very deep dark brown colour with a reddish hue.

    The first thing I am noticing is that the legs on this rum do not seem as viscous as I previously remember. I don’t normally comment on the “legs” but this is very obvious and must be due in part to the reduction in additives?

    Interesting. On the nose it doesn’t seem as sweet or intense as I remember either. Not so much raisin and coffee as before. Definitely less interesting as well.

    It seems a little muted. It’s much lighter and the sweetness whilst still carrying a fair amount of weight to the profile has a slightly artificial note to it.

    In all honesty I am a little surprised than long term drinkers of this haven’t noticed the shift? I’ve certainly not seen much by way of commentary around the shift in profile. There definitely is one from the 2014 edition. Not a subtle nuanced one either.

    This seems thinner, less complex, less interesting – more like a fairly average Spanish style mixer. Nothing more. The nose is completely unremarkable.

    Sipped it is agreeable enough. Light, sweetness with a slight saccharin note. Very little burn (next to none) and no real oak or aged profile at all. There is a bit of vanilla, some faint aroma’s of milk chocolate and a very sugary overall taste. Easy going, inoffensive, unsubstantial, muted and pretty boring overall.

    Mixed it adds sweetness and a little fruitiness but its not pulling up any trees.

    Whilst my taste shifted quickly away from Diplomatico Reserva Exclusiva the first time around, I do feel that the reduction in the “additives” is really noticeable. I’d imagine for its fans its probably not a good thing. Which is why I am a little puzzled there has been no backlash from.Diplomatico Reserva Exclusiva rum review by the fat rum pirate

    Have they even noticed? They surely aren’t that basic in their tastings as to not have? Have their palates caught up a little and are they preferring this in its less sweet guise? I’d be very surprised. The casual end of the rum drinkers spectrum has barely shifted in 20 years.

    I recall when reviewing their “no additive” Distillery Collection that I could kind of see why they used additives. I feel the same with this.

    It’s very, very average and in all honesty I can no longer see its lasting appeal even to those who prefer sweetened spirits. I feel this is living on a past reputation. Nevertheless it still seems to be selling.

    Anyway I’ve added a fancy photo using AI the type that helps sell this kind of thing. You like?

  • El Dorado Spiced Rum

    El Dorado Spiced Rum is a spiEl Dorado Spiced Rum Review by the fat rum pirateced rum from the El Dorado brand, funnily enough.  You would think that this would be a pretty easy bottling to come across? Surely a global powerhouse such as DDL know the selling power of Spiced Rum?

    It would seem they don’t as this is pretty hard to find here in the UK.  I don’t even think it is distributed over here.  It is more commonly found in mainland Europe but even still it is a rum many people are unaware of.

    If you do an image search on Google you will see a few different designs for this rum.  I am not sure how old this bottling is.  It seems pretty “old style” but the cap has the more recent El Dorado motif.  The bottling on the official El Dorado site is different but that is not guarantee that it is the most current bottling.  To say DDL are a little slow in doing things would be an understatement.

    The rum comes in a standard bar bottle with a good metal screw cap.  The design and colourway in my opinion is uninspring.  You get no information regarding the spices used other than “Subtly Spiced”.  It is bottled at a respectable 37.5% (making it qualify as a Spiced rum rather than Spirit Drink here in the UK).  The hydrometer test revealed less additives in this rum than most of the standard El Dorado range (especially the older bottlings).  Which is interesting.

    Fortunately the El Dorado website has some information regarding the spices used

    “Its unique blend of aged Demerara rums and natural spices – cinnamon and vanilla with hints of citrus – delivers a genuine Caribbean flavour with a smooth taste and rich aroma.”

    I actually picked this bottle up in Italy (San Remo) in what was a very interesting and well stocked store.  On the back label of the bottle is a white sticker giving details of the importer – Velier SPA our friend Luca Gargano nonetheless.

    Another interesting point about this rum is its colour.  It’s much lighter than your usual dark El Dorado Demeraras.  It reminds me very much of Foursquare’s Spiced Rum.

    In the glass and visible from the bottle the rum is a classic straw/gold colour.  It looks very much like a more “regular” rum.  It hasn’t been heavily coloured like so many Spiced Rums/Spirit Drinks.

    Nosing the rum I am once again thinking of Foursquare’s spiced.  It is very spice heavy rather than high on the added sugar content.  So many spiced rums are sugary vanilla laden atrocities.  So its good to see El Dorado didn’t go down that route.

    The rum in the blend I would say will be pretty young.  Even with the adEl Dorado Spiced Rum Review by the fat rum pirateded spices its still reasonably aggressive.  Quite which still it may come from I really couldn’t hazard a guess its likely from the Enmore but it could easily be that or the Versailles.  I doubt its from Port Mourant or contains much rum from that still if a blend.

    As a sipper its okay once you get past the youth of the rum.  It’s probably best with a block of ice.  It has a peppery spice to it and you also get a lot of bark, a cinnamon stick and some cloves.  It’s quite woody and earthy.  There is a sweetness to it but its counteracted by quite an oaked/woody bitterness.

    When you begin mixing the spices seem to retreat a little.  More in the forefront come the citrus and vanilla notes.  Wrapped up in a sweetness which is refreshingly not too sickly and cloying.  In all honesty I think I prefer this neat to mixed as I like the rummy-ness of it that way.

    I’m not sure how well distributed or how well this spiced rum sells.  I doubt it will appeal to the average spiced rum fan who seeks a vanilla and lime super sweet sugar bomb. Nor is it easily recognisable as an El Dorado product.  I would have expected a Spiced Rum from El Dorado to be very dark, heavy and rich.  Christmas Pudding like.  This is not like that at all and is quite “natural” tasting.  It’s more of an infusion than what perhaps most people would recognise as a spiced rum. It’s quite an odd product really and perhaps more evidence that El Dorado and DDL don’t really have their finger on the pulse.

    El Dorado Spiced rum review by the fat rum pirateIt has most in common with Foursquare Spiced and Elements Eight Exotic Spices, if you seek comparisons.  For all its relative pleasantness I don’t think it is as good as either of those.

    It’s pretty decent and if I could pick it more easily I’d probably by a bottle from time to time but I can’t say I’ve fallen in love with it.  If I wanted a sweet El Dorado kick I’d probably still just opt for mixing some of the 8 or 15 with coke if I’m being entirely honest.

    Still it has a certain authenticity about it which lets be honest El Dorado rums don’t always have.

     

     

     

     

     

     

  • Relicario Ron Dominicano Superior

    Relicario Ron Dominicano Rum Review by the fat rum pirateRelicario Ron Dominicano is a rum brand which hails from the Dominican Republic. The Dominican Republic is famous for the three B’s (Brugal, Barceló and Bermudez). The Dominican Republic is also known in the rum world for the various Oliver & Oliver bottlings such Opthimus and Presidente Marti.

    Dominican rum is a lighter Spanish style of rum similar in many ways to the rums that come out of Panama. Some are dosed and some taste dosed but the Hydrometer is easily fooled sadly.

    Relicario Rum appears to be a two bottle brand. I’ve noticed this bottling quite frequently in the UK but I have never come across the Supermo bottling which is featured on their website.

    The website like the bottle is very slick and nicely marketed. I can understand why people would buy this rum. The card sleeve is very sturdy and the bottle has a nice weight to it and a strong branding. The stopper does look like a cork but is actually a screw cap. It is however very large and durable. In the UK a bottle of Relicario Ron Dominicano Superior will set you back around £30-35. The ABV is a respectable 40% ABV (often Dominican rum is bottled at 38%). The rums in the blend are aged between 6 and 10 years in a Solero system. Relicario Superior is aged in ex-bourbon barrels.

    Although there is a Distillery tab on the website it doesn’t actually give you any information as to where this distillery is. Without this information I expect the rum to be distilled on Column stills rather than a Pot Still (or a blend of both). The distillery tab is actually quite amusing and has some of the most ridiculous marketing bollocks I have ever read – which says something in the rum world

    Fermentation – “Made from a rigorous selection of sucrose-rich streams which come from the sugar mill, where sugar cane is produced. The alcoholic stages are obtained through the fermentation of these sugary streams, which contribute in part to the aromatic composition of the final product”

    Utter goobledegook and I’m left with little else to say on the product. So I may as well get on with the nosing and tasting.

    Relicario Ron Dominicano Superior Rum Review by the fat rum pirateIn the glass Relicario Superior presents itself as a dark brown with vibrant orange and red flashes. It’s a classic rum colour if you like (almost certainly some caramel colouring is involved).

    On the nose Relicario if familiar. Light, slightly perfumed but with a refreshing amount of bourbon spice from the barrel and a nice hit of alcohol.

    It is much more peppery than oaked. The barrels used to age the rum have contributed to a spicy profile – white pepper and ginger. Vanilla and a slight lemon note are also present.

    The floral notes keep coming back on the nose. It reminds me of Floral Gums. Overall though Relicario has quite a nicely balanced and inviting nose. The more you nose and the more time the rum spends in the glass the more you notice the caramel and buttery notes.

    Sipped Relicario is very easy going. It does taste a little weak – maybe its just a bit too light overall. It’s fairly sweet but not overly so. It does have quite a bit of astringency to it though. Particularly in the finish. There’s a lot of spice and oak in the finish with a bitterness which develops into a very tobacco heavy finish.

    The Hydrometer didn’t identify any additives in this rum. Having said that I’m not 100% certain it would ever be classed as “pure” rum. I find it difficult to trust rums from certain destinations – The Dominican being one. It hasn’t been excessively sweetened or doctored but it does seem a little more rounded than I would perhaps expect. It seems to have had its wings clipped a little. That could of course be down to the ABV.

    As a sipper it starts sweetly with notes of caramel and toffee. You then get bitterness – tobacco and some spicy white pepper. The finish is a little sharp with some lemon zest and a lot of the oak and tobacco but it doesn’t hang around very long. You are left with just a bit of alcohol burn for much of the finish.

    It doesn’t stand out or do anything to exciting. Could be any number of other rums from the Dominican Republic or Panama. It didn’t surprise me in any way. It’s light and easy going. Quite easy to dRelicario Ron Dominicano Superior Rum Review by the fat rum piraterink yet you still feel like you are drinking a “proper” rum rather than something like Pyrat or Millonario.

    Much like most of the Barceló line up its just all a bit boring. There’s nothing exciting going on – nothing other than the presentation which would make it stand out from 50 other similar rums. I can’t imagine I’ll buy another bottle (unless its heavily discounted).

    Not bad but not all that good either. Very slightly above average. Easy to drink but easy to forget as well.

     

2 Comments

  1. I have a full and unopened bottle of this rum…I also found Lambs rum a tad bland , but then I quite like Woods and Pussers , so it shall remain unopened. I enjoyed reading your review , entertaining and informative…cheers .

Comments are closed.