Compagnie des Indes – Barbados 16 Year Old

CompagniedesindesBARBADOSCompagnie des Indes are a French based Independent bottler.  This Barbados offering is aged for 16 Years.  The distillate hails from the acclaimed Foursquare Distillery in St Philip.

Compagnie des Indes (East India Company) is the brainchild of Florent Beuchet.  Florent previously worked as the US Brand Ambassador for the Joseph Banks rum brand.  You may be familiar with their 5 and 7 Island blends.  They have also released some more expensive and very limited single cask rums.

The companies name and aim is to evoke memories of the 18th century.  A time when sailors would travel far and wide, to bring back the best produce from far flung corners of the globe.  In this instance the best rums in the world.

Unavailable presently in the UK this bottling came to my attention via Steven at Rum Diairies Blog. He insisted I had to try it. It is a 16 year old rum distilled in 1998 by Richard Seale at Foursquare.  Aged for 7 years in Barbados and 9 years in the less tropical climbs of Amsterdam and then Liverpool.  It was aged in ex-Jack Daniels barrels.  It is a blend of pot and column distilled rum.

The rum is bottled at 45% ABV and comes with a price tag of around 90 euros (about £75 with the current exchange rate, maybe more post Brexit).

Compagnie des Indes rums all come in a very fetching stubby style bottle with cork stoppers and a standard logo and label.  Beyond colour scheme changes it changes little, only to indicate the different rum contained within.  A little back story is down the side of the bottle (in French).  I like it when a company produces a uniform appearance for its rums and has a strong brand identity.  I think its particularly important for Independent bottlers.  The rum comes in a nice cut out carboard sleeve.  All good stuff so far.

Compagnie des Indes have already put out an impressive run of rums in France. Despite only being around for a year or so.  Sadly not so many have reached our shores but that seems to be improving.Compagnie des Indes Barbados Rum Review by the fat rum pirate

There has been quite a lot of activity from Foursquare Distillery in their own right over the past 12 months.  Despite that this rum is the first Foursquare offering I have had that is aged longer than 12 years.  It will be interesting to see how the extra 4 years European ageing have impacted the rum.

The rum presents itself as a classic light to golden brown, shimmers of orange as you swirl the rum in the glass.

As a Bajan rum the nose offers few surprises – nicely balanced oak and vanilla notes with some residual fruity sweetness running through it.  The nose is less oaked than Doorly’s 12 but much fruiter than RL Seales 10.

Sipping the rum initially doesn’t offer many surprises.  Lovely aged woody notes are beautifully balanced alongside vanilla and some slightly spicy peppery notes.  It’s quite a dry rum and it has a very long and very spicy finish.

Despite the drier profile and the spicier elements, as a sipper this has little alcohol burn.  It’s not fiery and its all very nicely balanced – classic Foursquare.  The aftertaste is very fresh and almost savoury.

There is no fancy finishing with this rum.  From the information I have gathered it seems this has been aged solely in Bourbon casks.  As a result it is a classic Bajan profile.  The Bourbon/Tennessee Whiskey ageing has its usual influence on the distillate.

Although this is 16 Years Old it seems that the European Ageing has decelerated some of the Oak Ageing.  The result is that the rum is very “fresh and clean” tasting.  The char, sometimes evident when rum is “over oaked” has not occurred.  I really like this rum even though when I’m breaking it down I’m making it sound pretty run of the mill!

I think it has got all the “good” aspects of Tropical and European ageing rolled into one wonderfully balanced, subtle yet complex, mellow sipping rum.  It’s great and I really wish I could get some more!

It is getting very difficult to score all these Foursquare offerings as we are really dealing with such miniscule differences in quality!  If you like Bajan rum then this will not disappoint.

If you can find it……..

4.5 stars

 

Similar Posts

  • Don Papa Rum Aged 10 Years

    Don Papa Rum Aged 10 Years Rum Review by the fat rum pirateDon Papa Rum Aged 10 Years. Alongside Bumbu, Don Papa have become the poster boys for adultered rum masquerading as premium. You could throw a few other rums into the mix, that use additives but Don Papa’s offerings are met with dismay and derision by most serious rum enthusiasts.

    Perhaps the biggest reason for this is the sheer success of the brand. So not content with offering us a 7 Year Old version of their delicious elixir they felt that a further aged version of their wonderous concoction, was just what the rum world needed.

    Presentation wise Don Papa tick all the boxes for the type of Premium rum you will find in department stores such as Harvey Nichols. It is striking and for the average consumer you will see the overall package of this rum and think it is a considerable step up from supermarket offering such as Captain Morgan and Lamb’s. The truth is better rum can easily be found now in UK supermarkets, in the shape of Chairman’s Reserve and Appleton Estate. Amongst others.

    The black and white colour scheme of this rum is offset by and orange labelling on the synthetic cork stopper. A black cork topped cylinder houses the rum. Which comes in a stubby bottle. Don Papa Rum Aged 10 Years has been bottled at 43% ABV. The trusty hydrometer indicates around 16g/L of additives are present. This may seem low but it has been shown in laboratory tests that it also contains glycerin and vanillan. Small amounts are needed to significantly sweeten things up. The hydrometer does not pick up such small amounts of intense flavour.

    Anyone familiar with this site is probably not surprised by my apparent distain for this particular rum. Those of you arriving from a Google Search or visiting for the first time might wonder why I am effectively saying this rum is awful before I even conduct the tasting etc. I usually try not to do this but this brand are one that take the concept of “rum” a step to far. This product is at best a spiced rum and at worst a flavoured neutral spirit.

    It’s popularity is fuelled by a natural human love of sweetness and complete ignorance of what rum actually is. We are sadly still in an age where rum is perceived as sweet as it is produced from sugar.  It is not produced from sugar. It is produced using the by products of sugar production. From the sugar cane. During distillation all the sugar turns to alcohol. Rum is not naturally sweet – at least not to the extent that rums such as Don Papa might lead you to believe.

    This is a rum produced from molasses and aged for 10 years in American oak barrels. Ex-bourbon barrels.

    Don Papa Rum Aged 10 Years Rum Review by the fat rum pirateIn the glass Don Papa Aged 10 Years is a very dark brown. Almost black. It’s a bit of a push to say a 10-year-old rum would be this dark even if it has been aged in Sugarlandia (I am not making that up it’s what they call it).

    The nose is very familiar – huge wafts of raspberry flavoured bubblegum.  Notes of sweet artificial saccharin. Cherry flavoured boiled sweets and a slight hint of some kind of spice trying to break out but its just overpowered by the artificial confected notes.

    It smells like a liqueur – it is ludicrously sweet. It is as far away as a 10-year-old molasses based rum from say Barbados or Jamaica as it is possible. The very idea this can even be labelled as a rum is frankly, a complete embarrassment to the category.

    Sipped you are overwhelmed by a synthetic tart, bitterness. It tastes like a reduced sugar Marmalade. Full of that slightly bitter artificial sweetener like taste.Luckily the huge burst of sugary orange quickly subsides. As does everything else.

    Don Papa Aged 10 Years doesn’t really develop onto anything meaningful. Beyond the sweet/bitter orange on the initial sip you only really experience sweet saccharin notes on the mid palate. There is something which is trying to be oak ageing in there but its just overwhelmed by all the nonsense they have added to this putrid mess.

    An easy comparison – to suggest this is a good rum would be like suggesting Cherry Lambrini is a good wine. No one in the wine community would put up with such nonsense so why the hell does rum put up with bullshit like this? Why will spirit professionals not speak up about this complete and utter insult to rum? Heads in the trough is why. Money, money, money. Wankers.

    Don Papa Rum Aged 10 Years Rum Review by the fat rum pirateFortunately because your taste buds have been assaulted in such a way you probably won’t even notice the finish. It’s very much a blink and you miss it kind of affair. A tiny hint of something sweet and woody – and its gone. All that is left on the palate is artificial bitterness.

    I actually think the No.7 might be better than this. It is as a sipper virtually undrinkable to anyone with a palate. If you are a 12 year old chav with a love for White Lightning and Cinema Pick and Mix then this might be the “rum” for you. However you could buy around 4 litres of Morgan’s Spiced Gold or better still head to Lidl or Aldi for some even cheaper spiced nonsense – for the £50 plus you would pay for this bottled bullshit. For the record I am not advocating any 12 year old’s should be drinking this or any other rum for that matter. My 3-year-old could probably drink this festering gloopy mess it has no alcohol taste to it whatsoever.

    I hate everything about this and the brand. An utter disgrace to rum. A joke in every sense. You will find sadly more favourable reviews online. Here’s a clue they were freebies. Lance over at the Lone Caner was more honest and gave it one of his lowest ever scores. Some of the feelings I have for this have also been expressed by Lance here. The first thing he says is exactly what I thought!

    I hate this so much right now! I was actually given this by someone who had it gifted to them. They couldn’t actually drink this.

    Gateway rum? Gateway to what? It’s certainly not rum that’s for sure.

  • Mezan Diamond Distillery Guyana 2007 PX Cask Finish

    Mezan Diamond Distillery Guyana 2007 P.X. Cask Finish Rum review by the fat rum pirateMezan Diamond Distillery Guyana 2007 PX Cask Finish. I’ve not been reviewing a great deal of Independent Bottlings of late. I’m not going to pretend I’m wearing some kind of halo and advocating Distillery Bottlings. Thing is though, with the likes of Foursquare, Worthy Park and Hampden Estate producing so many of their own bottlings over the past few years, I’ve found my buying habits pointing more in that direction.

    The sheer quality and the reassurance of 100% Tropically Aged rum is a big selling point for me. Increasingly, I’m just not picking up Independent Bottlings the way I used to.

    So I was quite surprised to find that my wife had decided to buy me a bottle of this Mezan Diamond Distillery Guyana 2007 PX Cask Finish. To be honest she’s really been pulling out some great stuff over the past couple of years. The type of rums I consider buying but opt for something slightly different. Then wish I had bought them a few weeks later, when they sell out!

    I cannot remember the last Mezan rum I reviewed. I’ve reviewed 6 so far. 2 actually from Guyana. In terms of my experience with Mezan Rum, it has been mixed. I really enjoyed their Panama expressions and the continuous release the Mezan Jamaica XO. Others bottlings not so keen.

    Now, Mezan have never become known as being a fantastic Independent Bottler in the way Velier, or before them Samaroli became famous. Until recently, they tended to bottle at between the 40-46% ABV mark. For many enthusiasts, looking at Independent Bottlings – this is no longer an option. Many want to see the Cask Strength Expression straight from the barrel.

    However, by bottling the rums at a more conservative strength it allows for more bottles to be produced. The price of a “standard” strength Mezan bottling (£35-50) has remained  very competitive. They were one of the first IB I tried when I first dipped my toes in the waters of IB’s. Mostly due to the cost to be honest.

    If you are after further information on Mezan Rum I interviewed their CEO Neil Mathieson a few years back. Feels like a life time ago now!

    Anyway, lets take a look at what we are getting in this bottle. Mezan Diamond Distillery Guyana 2007 PX Cask Finish comes in Mezan’s rounded stubby bottle. This is a Cask Strength offering and is unsweetened, uncoloured and un-chill filtered. So the standards are set and presented prominently on the front label. No fannying about here. This is rum from a Single Cask (though I understand it is a blend of rums – we’ll come to that later). My bottle is from Cask number 1 of 3 and is bottle number 72 of 423.

    Now, the exact still is not stated on the bottle. It’s about the only information that isn’t available. However, it is noted on the rear label that this “rum is blended from spirit produced by several of the column stills” at the Diamond Distillery. DDL have a number of column stills (I am not 100% sure how many were operational as of 2007) including the EHP Coffey Still originally housed at the Enmore Sugar Plantation and the French Savalle still which was moved from Uitivlugt.  Both stills can produced a variety of different rum marques which are used in some of the El Dorado rum brand line up.

    This rum has been matured in ex-bourbon barrels, aside from the last year where theMezan Diamond Distillery Guyana 2007 P.X. Cask Finish Rum review by the fat rum pirate rum was moved into an PX Sherry cask for the “finish” or secondary maturation. It was distilled in 2007 and bottled in 2019 and is noted as being aged 12 years. It was aged in Europe for 9 of these years. All this information is provided on the bottles rear label. As you can see.

    This rum retails at around the £105-110 mark and is bottled at Cask Strength 56% ABV. As well as the stubby Mezan bottle, you also get a wooden cut out display case and a cloth “marble” style bag. Which you can also store the rum in. All in all its a very nicely presented package. You can currently buy this for £104.95 over at Master of Malt.

    Well, I think I’ve given all the information I have on this particular bottling and I’m getting a bit thirsty. So lets see how this went down………

    In the glass Mezan Diamond Distillery Guyana 2007 PX Cask Finish is a very dark brown almost mahogany in colour.

    Nosing – Mezan Diamond Distillery Guyana 2007 P.X. Cask Finish is very rich and fruity. Lots and lots of raisins, sultanas, figs and some dark berries – blackberries and blueberries. Amongst all this fruitiness, is a wonderful overlay of toffee, caramel and a touch of molasses.

    Beneath this, is a warming note of oak and some light vanilla ice cream. A touch of single cream and a slight peanut brittle type note. I’m getting shortbread and baking spices as well. It’s remarkably complex. It’s really lovely on the nose.

    When sipped it is as expected from the nosing but the ABV gives this an extra ooomph. This really adds even further depth to the rum.

    The initial sip is quite sweet with notes of sweet sherry, toffee, raisin and plum. This isn’t the full story though. Further sips reveal notes of tobacco, oak and some heat – a touch of green chilli/wasabi. The mid palate moves into a mix of tobacco, vanilla and sweet Rum and Raisin ice cream. With some toffee sauce maybe…….

    As the rum moves onto the finish, you notice a shift and the sweeter notes are replaced by some tannic red wine and liquorice notes. The finish is very long and warming with a lovely array of oak spices, vanilla, dark chocolate and a smoky tobacco note.

    Mezan Diamond Distillery Guyana 2007 P.X. Cask Finish Rum review by the fat rum pirateThere is so much going on with this rum, it’s difficult to describe everything that you will encounter. This drinks more like a Tropically Aged Demerara than a lot of other IB’s, I have had recently. This is a rich, fruity rum which shows just how rum really doesn’t need to be artificially sweetened. A secondary maturation or finish in a quality cask will give you all the sweetness you need.

    It may be, that some of the notes I have written might give people and impression of overbearing sweetness. This is a similar profile to the likes of Foursquares Exceptional Cask Series. Sweet but not sweetened.

    I’m pleased I’ve used the Exceptional word because this rum is certainly be-fitting that tag.

    Stunning stuff. Highly recommended.

     

     

  • Bacardi Anejo

    Bacardi Anejo Rum Review by the fat rum pirateBacardi Anejo. Aside from the usual Bacardi bottles you find in the Supermarket and Duty Free a trip to the continent (and further a field) can often throw up a few more variations from the Puerto Rican rum powerhouses.

    I picked up this bottle of Bacardi Anejo in May 2019 on holiday in Salou. I think the 1 litre bottle was around €15. I’d not seen this particular expression before. I could tell from the presentation (and the dustiness) of the bottle that it was not a “new” release.

    Bacardi re-designed their logo around 2015 so this is definitely before then. Such is the volume of Bacardi’s output you see releases still available for years after they are discontinued. Indeed Bacardi recently released a 4 year old Cuatro Anejo.

    I’ve looked around for some information on this rum and have been able to determine the following. As is noted on the rear of the bottle this is not a Puerto Rican rum. It was actually distilled a the first distillery Bacardi opened outside of Cuba way back in 1929. Destileria de Galarza in Mexico. The Spanish writing on the label suggests is was produced primarily for the Spanish speaking market. I cannot ever recall seeing this rum in the UK.

    It is produced from fermented molasses, distilled on multi column stills and is aged in ex-bourbon barrels, for up to 3 years. Some websites state it has rum aged up to 6 years old. It is bottled at 38% ABV.

    It is presented in what was the familiar Bacardi style of the nineties and for much of this century, until the recent re-branding. The opaque bottle hides the colour of the liquid it has a plastic screw cap and there is a diffuser in the neck of the bottle. To prevent “re-filling the bottle” with Bacardi Anejo Rum Review by the fat rum piratecheaper or inferior spirit.

    In glass we have a fairly light brown spriit. A shade or two darker than straw but not quite dark enough to refer to as golden brown.

    The nose is very light. It’s slightly “stony” and quite reminiscent of most Bacardi rums. It has a weird grainy, mineral like taste. This one however lacks some of the sweeter buttery notes that were found in the Anejo Cuatro or the Ocho released over the past couple of years.

    There is some light oak spices and some gentle alcohol notes. It’s quite weak on the nose but there is a fair amount of booze coming through. Young alcohol, nothing more really of note, unfortunately.

    Sipped, it just tastes like a watery version of the Anejo Cuatro. It’s light with a slight butteriness, theres a little integration of oak and a touch of light spices. Some shortbread and a touch of tobacco mingle alongside each other. Some light smoky notes.

    I’m using light too much but that is essentially what this is. Dialled down to 38% ABV it makes for a very watery and very light rum. There’s little to no body and it’s all just a bit meh. Well actually a lot meh.

    The initial sips greats you with Bacardi’s trademark sweet entry. It then mBacardi Anejo Rum Review by the fat rum pirateoves onto some ginger and some light notes of pepper. The finish is next to non-existant as the ginger and pepper are overtaken by a slight bitter tobacco note which quickly fades away. All of this is running alongside some rough sweet alcohol which is delivering most if not all the flavour. A good sipper it is not.

    And to be fair its probably not meant to be a sipper. So how do we see this one as a mixer? Shall we try it with cola?

    It’s pretty forgetful to be honest.  It reminds me very much of Bacardi Black, only I must admit its not quite as tobacco heavy as that monstrosity. This is just weaker and less flavourful. Again all I get is a bit of a sweet tobacco note and some booze.

    It’s all just so boring. Hang on a minute. Urgh there is a nasty almost artificial kind of aftertaste as well. Bitter nastiness.

    Best avoided even if it is pretty cheap.

     

     

  • Pusser’s Navy Rum “Nelson’s Blood” Aged 15 Years

    Pussers 15 Years Nelsons Blood review by the fat rum piratePusser’s “Nelson’s Blood” Aged 15 Years is their marquee expression.  I think, (and I will get this all confirmed) that the rum is a different blend to the Blue Label.  It is not just a more aged version of it.  However, I also understand that despite this it is still a blend of Trini rum with a hefty dose of the famous Port Mourant wooden still distillate.

    One of the difficulties with being a prolific rum reviewer, ahem is that you often misplace information and in between intoxication and sobriety returning some bugger turns the Interweb upside down and you can no longer find that wonderful resource of information.  Clearly the sober reviewer would bookmark such sites……or remember their names.   So if any of my information is a bit muddled please let me know.  Apologies for the lack of concrete information but I am in discussion with Pusser’s marketing director Laura Addis and she will soon put me straight.

    Onto the bottle and its a lot different to the Blue Label. It is rounder with a shorter neck.  The wonderfully unique blue topped synthetic stopper of the Blue Label is not present and instead we have a plain black real cork stopper.  The general presentation of Pussers is unique in the rum world.  As is the heritage of the rum.  I sincerely doubt any other 15 Year Old Aged Rum would be packaged in something quite like this.  Now if it wasn’t for the British Navy links this rums packaging would seem almost gaudy and slightly cheap.  Yet because it is Pusser’s Navy Rum it seems only fitting. It’s bright and punchy and you can tell the rum inside isn’t going to be messing about.

    Pussers 15 Year Old costs between £40 and £50 in the UK for a 70cl bottle (it’s worth shopping around).  Unlike the “old” UK Blue Label or the “new” Gunpowder Proof Black Label (same rum new packaging) it is not bottled at Navy Strength.  Rather than being 54.5% ABV (109 proof) it is bottled at 40% ABV (80 proof).

    Now I’ve already touched upon the difficulties of research and the problems encountered by having to drink on the job.  So just to let you all know at this stage in proceedings I am yet to have a drop of alcohol today.  As with all my reviews I have already spent some time with the “Nelson’s Blood”.  For the purposes of this review I am also going to make reference to Pussers Blue Label (again) and I will also be taking in a few drops of another rum which I feel has similarities to Pusser’s 15.

    So on with the tasting.  The rum presents itself as a deep brown with vibrant flashes of red.  It is nigh on identical to the Pussers Blue Label.  On the nose, again it has that very distinctive rich fruity slightly malt like nose.  The nose is sweeter than the Blue Label and it also has a hint of varnish.  Lovers of Pusser’s will be pleased to learn that this rum, despite its sweetness still displays that full frontal assault on the senses which suggests the rum should be respected.  Sip with caution!

    The nose is much richer than the Blue Label, it is almost treacly, deep dark molasses which reminds me a little of the richness of Myers’s but with a Demerara sweetness as opposed to Jamaican funk.  It’s almost like a concentrate.  It makes you want to divePussers 15 Years Nelsons Blood review by the fat rum pirate into the rum.

    The mystery rum I alluded to earlier in the piece is a 1990 Port Morant from Bristol Classic Rum.  Whilst the taste of these rums is very different (the Bristol has an almost earthy note to it where Pusser’s imparts intense sweetness) the nose is very similar.  I had thought prior to tasting them side by side that the rums were quite similar but I now know it was my sense of smell playing tricks on me.  The influence of smell should not be underestimated.

    So on with the tasting (check out the cool coasters in the pic’s). Tasting these three rums side by side has been an enlightening experience.  I have always considered Pusser’s Blue Label to be quite sweet but sipping it alongside the 15 it is found to be almost bitter.  Compared to the Bristol Port Morant it is almost like drinking rum cream!

    Now before you take my previous paragraph as a criticism let me explain.  It’s simple really.  I like sweet rum.  I add sweetener to my coffee.  I like sugar on my corn flakes.  I don’t like whisky.  I don’t like gin.  Oh and I exaggerated about the rum cream.  Pussers 15 does have added sugar as confirmed by the tests of Johnny Drejer but that doesn’t mean it will be dismissed as a bad rum.

    Pusser’s 15 is sweeter than the Blue Label but at the same time it still has all those characteristics that you so enjoy.  It has the wonderful complex fruity nose, which has just enough character to make you have a couple of ice cubes on hand….just in case.  Despite its sweetness the rum is initially quite challenging.

    The flavour bursts through it is rich and fruity but it also has that dry almost whisky like note.  Despite all the upfront sweetness the rum gives a very spicy burn on the way down.  Despite the ageing the rum still has that manly kick in the nuts type feel to it.  I have seen one review (Lance over at The Lone Caner) describe Pusser’s as an “unapologetic bruiser”  I couldn’t have put it any better myself (which is why I’ve nicked it).  It’s one the booziest rums I have tried.

    The trick with sipping the Pusser’s 15 is to let the first few sips coat your palate.  I’ve only had a very small amount and already the fiery burn is subduing and I am getting more flavour and less spicy burn.  A few sips also relieves the dry whisky like note. It’s now more like a cognac or brandy.  I hate comparisons to other spirits but Pusser’s is so complex that you just can’t help it.  Despite all these comparisons you are never in any doubt that you are drinking something which could have been used to splice the mainbrace time and time again!  Having said that this rum is not the same blend which the British Royal Navy sailed on.

    Pussers 15 Years Nelsons Blood review by the fat rum pirateI would love to give a few tasting notes on the Pusser’s 15 but I’m finding that with each visit I’m finding something more.  There are few rums which can exhibit so many different facets of the various rum styles but Pusser’s 15 is one of them.  The only common trait in rum which I cannot really detect with this rum is oakiness.  It has the sweetness of an El Dorado Demerara and the tread carefully” menace of a Caroni, it has deep fruity “funk” of a Jamaican.  Okay I’ll give it shot…..

    Caramely treacly toffee, Juicy pineapple, dark bruised banana, sweet chocolate raisins all wrapped up in a still quite potent tasting spirit.  There is an underlying menace and despite the ageing still a lot of punch to this rum

    Pusser’s 15 is a great rum.  Personally I still prefer the Blue Label and Gunpowder blends.  Whilst you can mix Pusser’s 15 I found that the Blue Label blend made a better rum and cola.  This is better as a sipper but again I have had slightly better sipping experiences in my time.  For my tastes it is possibly just a little bit too sweet.

    However, it is still a lot better than rums such as Diplomatico Reserva Exclusiva, Ron Zacapa and a few other of the sweetened “Premium” rums.  It’s still a rum well worth seeking out and trying.

    4 stars

     

     

     

     

     

  • Skotlander Handcrafted Rum V 1,400 SØMIL

    Skotlander Handcrafted Rum V 1,400 SØMILSkotlander Handcrafted Rum V 1,400 SØMIL is perhaps the most bizarrely named rum I have reviewed so far.  The strange name owes mostly to the way it has been aged.  When translated into English and the story is told it does make a lot more sense.  Even if the way the rum has been aged is a little baffling…….

    Skotlander Spirits hail from Denmark.  Not Scotland as some have commented on Social Media.  Believe it or not but some people have suggested the name is confusing. A simple Google search would easily dismiss any misconceptions.  This seems beyond some.

    Skotlander’s website asks you immediately on visiting if you wish to translate it into English.  It is currently available in English and Danish.  It’s really well done and has a great deal of information on the rums.  You can also buy their range online via the site.

    The rum up for review is their most recent release.  Translated into English the 1,400 refers to Nautical Miles.  As I mentioned the rum has been aged in a rather unique way.  The rear label of the bottle gives us the backstory.

    As you can see the rum has been aged in PX Sherry Casks and aged onboard Anders Skotlander’s Schooner Mira.  The rum was bottled at Cask Strength after being aged for 1400 Nautical miles around the Danish coast.

    Skotlander Handcrafted Rum V is packaged in a modern stubby style bottle with a wooden topped synthetic cork stopper.  The presentation is very sleek and clean.  It’ a very modern looking package.  Included with my two rums came a booklet on Skotlander’s rums and a Cocktail booklet with a number of cocktail and syrup recipes.  The rum also came with a white cloth bag with the Skotlander hog/pig logo.  All in all a very classy package.Skotlander Handcrafted Rum V 1,400 SØMIL

    The 50cl bottle has been released at Cask Strength of 61.6% ABV.  It is a limited edition of 704 bottles.  My bottle is number 415.  The rum retails at around the 200 Euro mark. The rum is small batch, pot distilled it has no additives, no chill filtration and is a natural colour.  It is not cheap but Skotlander ensure their customers that the rum is made using the finest grade sugarcane molasses in the world.

    In the glass the rum is very vibrant reddish brown.  I don’t know how long aged 1400 Nautical Miles is but it seems there has been quite a lot of interaction with the PX Sherry Cask to get this colour.

    The nose is sweet – there are some quite strong scents of sweet “booze”.  Beneath these quite strong fumes you also get a nice toffee aroma.  There are notes of what I would recognise as port or sherry – rich deep wine like scents.

    Further nosing reveals a slightly vegetal note – reminiscent of young Jamaican Overproofs.  It also reminds me of a small batch Pot Still rum from England called Old Salt Rum.  However these notes are only slightly detectable.  There is on occasion a little flash of varnish.

    All in all at full ABV it is a very complex smelling rum.  It is quite menacing and certainly a rum which you should approach with respect.

    Sipped at full strength it is initially sweet as the nose promises.  Skotlander Handcrafted Rum V 1,400 SØMILYou get a really nice fruity burst – redcurrants and blackberries.  Then the toffee notes arrive, they quickly fade into quite a sharp bittersweet melding of spices and smokiness.  Despite its sweetness it is quite a heavy and very rich rum.  Kind of like a mix of
    Pussers and Caroni in many ways.  The nearest I have tasted in terms of intensity of flavour has been the Foursquare 2013 Habitation Velier release.  They are very similar in a lot of ways.

    Taken down a notch or two with a drop of water the rum is a little lighter to sip.  You don’t lose any of the intense flavours but I can certainly taste a lot more oak which for me gives it a little bit more balance.  Initially I felt this was a better option but over time I have developed quite a taste for the rum at the higher ABV.  Albeit in much smaller sips.

    It’s expensive.  Both to the consumer and for the producer.  It is not something being done on the cheap, by a company looking to make a quick buck.  They want this rum to be the best it can be and they have also produced something, which is very distinctive.

     

  • Gargano Rum Classification – Can it Change the Rum World?

    Gargano Rum Classification Article by the fat rum pirate Hampden StillIntroduction

    I’ve been asked a few times recently why I’m not supporting the Gargano Rum Classification.  By support, I assume people are wondering why I haven’t featured the classification on the site? Or why I haven’t adopted it in my reviews?

    Fact is, I have for a long time tried whenever possible to find out how the rum in my bottle has been produced.  Which is exactly what the Gargano Rum Classification involves. Though I haven’t “come out” in favour quite as enthusiastically or as quickly as some, the more information disclosed the better in my book.

    Background

    The Gargano Rum Classification system has been drawn up in conjunction with Barbados rum producer and Master Distiller Richard Seale by Luca Gargano of Velier. Both Velier and Foursquare have put out some of, if not the best rum over the past 20 years and beyond. Velier recently celebrated its 70th birthday. Richard Seale is a third generation master distiller. Anything these two are involved in is usually for the good of rum.

    Initial Thoughts

    If you are like me you tend not to take things at face value and just agree with everything.  Some may consider me to be cynical. I see this more of being realistic.  I don’t believe in fairies and unicorns.  I tend to dig deeper into things.  Not only do I read what is put in front of me. I also consider the implications of what is being presented. In effect I map peoples ideas through to the logical conclusion(s).  Or rather what I think the logical conclusion will be.  I will mention at this stage that I have asked Richard a few questions regarding the classification. I’m not flying blind with some of my opinions.

    In order for me to justify and explain my thoughts on the Gargano Classification I will take you through a few prior attempts at classifying rum, as well as this proposed system.

    I say proposed, even though it is already being used. Velier/Habitation Velier and Foursquare have adopted the classification and others are also working towards it. As it stands it has not been adopted by many producers. It  is still in a pretty embryonic stage.

    Rum Flavour MapThe Rum Flavour Map

    In 2015 a Rum Flavour Map started popping up all over the internet.  It was it claimed similar to that used to classify Scotch Whisky.  The map was produced by Spiridom.

    “Spiridom is a joint venture between leading rhum brands from Guadeloupe, Rhum Damoiseau, and Martinique, Rhum Clement and Rhum J.M. Founded in 2005, the company is responsible for the distribution and development of Rhum Clement, Rhum J.M and Rhum Damoiseau in France and around the world.”

    The Rum Flavour Map basically tossed all the rum in the world into just three categories – French, English and Spanish style.  It in now way differentiates between Pot and Column production.  Nor does it account for blends from different islands and styles.

    I accept that classifying rum is tricky.  I have a Rum Styles page on the site which fails to identify every kind of rum and it has seven or eight categories!  It’s not really the lack of categories that annoyed me about this system.

    As noted already Spiridom represent producers from the French category.  Now take a look at the flavour map and look at the adjectives used to describe the French style in comparison to the Spanish and English styles.  Words such as oily, lighter, spiced and dark are not there to be complimentary.

    Unfortunately the Rum Flavour Map went a step further than this and re-inforced its very biased view by describing molasses based rum in the most unflattering way possible – Industrial or as even the French don’t actually really call it Rhum Industriel.

    This was a poor effort designed to elevate Rhum Agricole at the expense of other rums.

    Hold that thought about Industrial rum though.

    Best in Class RumXP Tasting Competition 2017 by the fat rum pirateClassification in Competition

    Just about every bottle of rum on the market could have an award from the various tasting competitions that are held all around the world.  There are so many competitions and as a consequence so many categories used.

    In the main rums are “classified” on age and/or colour.  Occasionally they are judged by geography as well as age. More often than not though a 10 Year Old rum from Barbados will be put in direct competition against a 15 year old Solera rum from Panama or a funky Pot Still Jamaican rum will find itself judged alongside an Agricole rhum.

    Judging a rum by its colour is an utter nonsense in a world were rum is rarely bottled at natural colour.  Age is an indicator and gives the consumer an expectation level but you shouldn’t really judge whether a 15 Year Old Jamaican rum is better than a 15 Year Old Demerara. Apples and Pears.

    An utter nonsense and a complete mess.

    Classification by Writers, Bloggers and Journalists

    A lot of rum writers have tried to “nail” down rum using categories etc.  Again this has taken on numerous guises.  Colour, age, Geography have all been tried with varying success.  In Dave Broom’s Rum The Manual he tries to plot numerous rums in a X and Y style axis.  Its a scattered approach and once again – its not perfect. Again I have a page called Rum Styles which seeks to identify the most common types of rum by method based mostly on Geography.  It is a start but again it is not perfect.

    Having said that it is a lot better than some efforts.  Especially those written by people with little interest or knowledge of rum.  We’ll leave those well alone though.

    Foursquare 2013 Pure Single rum Habitation Velier Rum review by the fat rum pirat

    So with many attempts to classify rum in the past – What has Luca Gargano proposed?

    Gargano Rum Classification – Categories

    Rather than use colour, age or even Geography Luca has opted for a much simpler approach based on the method of production.  Which is something from looking into the subject that has not been seriously considered or implemented before.

    The system is relatively simple rum is classified in the following manner

    Pure Single Rum – Molasses 100% Batch Pot Still Distillation
    Pure Single Agricole Rhum – Cane Juice 100% Batch Pot Still Distillation
    Single Blended Rum –  Blend of 100% Traditional Column and Pot Still rums

    Traditional Rum – Traditional 100% Column Still Distillation
    Modern Rum – Modern / Industrial Multi-Column Distillation

    Pure = 100% Pot Still rum
    Single = 100% Single Distillery rum

    Thoughts/Conclusions

    As you can see the classification groups rums by production method.  Like Scotch Whisky it differentiates between blended product and single – in this instance though using distillery not malt.

    Which is really my first misgiving about the system.  Whether deliberate or not just like Scotch Whisky, it is in danger of creating a belief that Pure Single Rum with 100% Pot Still Distillation is the best.  Which in turn like Scotch Whisky will lead those who aren’t that well-informed to think that it is always the superior product.  Now I would say as an entry point into rum, 100% Pot Still rum is probably not the best place for most people to start their rum journey.

    It creates intentionally or not a hierachy.  It will give someone the belief that the quality of the rum goes down as you pass down the list.  Like I say this may not be intentional but unfortunately that will be how people will see it. It is how some people are already seeing it.

    Education will inform this but the belief that a Pure Single Rum that is 100% Pot Still batch is the “best” or the holy grail of rums is in my opinion and experience not always the case.

    Habitation Velier WP 502 Forsyths White Rum Review by the fat rum pirate Worthy ParkI really hope we aren’t looking to enter a world where Single Blended rum is no longer seen as an exceptionallly high quality product.  Moving further down the scheme of things even Modern Rum can be pretty damn tasty if we look to the likes of Don Q.

    Which moves me along to my next misgiving about the system – Modern Rum.  You may recall earlier I mentioned Industrial rum.  Well originally that is how this section was named – Industrial Rum.  Hardly flattering in any context I’m sure you will agree.  I am pleased to see that this moniker has been changed.

    Having said that I will still be surprised if producers of such rums will adopt the system.

    Another complaint regarding the classification (though not from me this time) is that it doesn’t cover everything.  Well it does and it doesn’t.  Straight up it seems to miss out blends from multiple distilleries.  So rums such as Pussers Gunpowder might struggle to get a “classificiation”.  I’d question whether such rums really need it to be honest.

    I would say it is in the hands of producers to decide if they wish to adopt the classification and then decide how they feel their rum fits.  I am not advocating at this stage they just make it up ie claiming Pure Single Rum when its modern.  Maybe the producers need to work with Luca to further develop and tweak the classification?

    So what do I see on the plus side of the Gargano Classification?

    Well the obvious one for me will be the availability of more information regarding the rum in the bottle.  Which from my point of view is a huge step forward.  In terms of transferring information across to my readers the Habitation Velier bottlings have been a god send.  The information contained on this bottlings is first rate and exactly what enthusiasts want.

    To categorise rum by production method is absolutely the correct thing to do in my opinion.

    It is also worth noting that whilst the classification doesn’t mention additives (such as sugar added post distillation) wherever 100% is used in the classification it means just that. So if you have added anything (barring water for proofing reasons) to your rum it must be placed in the Modern Rum category. This is a point which is very clear – once it has been pointed out to you. In my case Richard Seale made this (now obvious) point clear to me. Again, I am in favour of this

    I also consider something else which  may be seen as a downside to many to actually being a source of strength for the classification.

    The Big Boys won’t use it.

    Yip that’s what I said – The Big Boys won’t use it.  Even taking the Industrial moniker away and replacing it with Modern Rum I still do not think the likes of Bacardi and Diageo will adopt the classification.

    Now if you read many publications online you would automatically assume this would be a bad thing.  If (and this only an estimate) 90% of rums do not have the classification visible how will the system ever work?

    Well obviously if most producers don’t adopt the system then it will be globally less visible.  However, if you buy cheap mixers from the likes of Captain Morgan and Bacardi how long do they last? A couple of weekends? A month maybe?

    If you buy a more expensive rum how long will you keep it?  You’ll likely savour it – keep it for special occasions.  If you really like it you might rush out and buy a back up.  It’s likely you’ll hang onto the bottle considerably longer.  You’ll look at the bottle more, take in everything on it soon you’ll become familiar with “Pure Single Rum”.

    Next time you are in a store or shopping online you’ll start looking for “Pure Single Rum” or “Single Blended Rum”.  You might even ask if the store stocks any such rums.  When the clerk can’t answer your query (because his stock of big boy rum doesn’t give an answer) its likely you’ll leave the store empty handed.

    Once your curiosity has been piqued you will start to search for “Pure Single Rum” or “Single Blended Rum”.  If you cannot identify how a rum has been produced you will stop buying such rums. “Super Premium” just might not cut it if you can’t be told what is actually in the bottle.

    The key to the classification is that it is giving you information.  Thus educating and giving you a better understanding of rum.

    The fact is the success of this classification could be that the big boys don’t adopt it inadvertently guiding customers towards those producers who have.

    Now do not think this will involve any Rum snobbery either.  Foursquare bottlings in the £30-35 price range have begun denoting if they are Pure Single Rum or Single Blended Rum etc.

    The Big Boys continually use terms such as “Premium” and “Super Premium”.  How will these terms exist in a world where people are aware of the difference between Pure Single Rum and Modern rum?  Will we continue to see the likes of Bacardi thinking all they need to do is re-package the same multi column distilled rum and call it “Super Duper Premium”?

    Has the recent Facundo range really set the world alight?

    The next time they do a promotional article using the same old tricks will the Rum public be fooled or will we start asking more and more questions?

    You see that is where the pressure will be applied to adopt the system.  If the average consumer wants more information on what they are drinking.  It is very difficult and also stupid to ignore your audience.

    Of course it may pan out that the system has no influence.  Consumers will continue with their current buying habits.  I would say over the past few years there has definitely been an increase in awareness.  I believe this system will have an influence.  I’m not saying it will change the rum buying “habits” of every rum consumer but it will certainly sway some. I’m more than sure Velier and Foursquare bottlings will continue to sell very well in the future.Foursquare Rum Distillery Triptych Rum Review by the fat rum pirat

    Whilst any classification system will have its pro’s and con’s this system is by far the best system to elevate rum and to enable the consumer to actually understand what is in the bottle.

    No magic herb gardens, no ageing facilities in the clouds or under the sea, no tales of non-existent Pirates or Admirals – just simple cold hard facts based on how the spirit in your bottle was actually distilled.

    Couple this with additional information on the bottle regarding ageing and genuine age statements and what do you have? The potential for genuine Premium Rum to be recognised by every consumer.