Foursquare Penultimus

FFoursquare Penultimus Rum review by the fat rum pirateoursquare Penultimus. Ah yes I’m ahjead of the game with this Exceptional Cask Series release. In fact I am reviewing this using the final 30ml of it currently available in the UK.

You’re quite correct it hasn’t been released in blighty yet. However I have contacts, influential contacts. Step forward the wonderful Peter Holland who is the UK (and possibly European) Rum Ambassador for Doorly’s and all things Foursquare delivery.

Now Peter has been sending me sample of Foursquare releases for some time. However, this is the first one he has hand delivered to the doorstep of thefatrumpirate.com Towers here in (not so sunny) Sunderland up here in the Frozen North. Which was very kind. I had intended to see him at the Newcastle Whisky Festival but unfortunately it was sold out. So he detoured on his way home to kindly drop this sample of.

So here I am on a Sunday morning analysing my notes from last nights sampling and putting together a rather smug first review of Penultimus. With a broken arm – again. I think the footballing gods are conspiring against the come back of the greatest rgiht footed left back since Denis Irwin. The bastards.

Oh and this is in the aftermath of a rather fitful nights sleep thanks to storm “Dave”. I was going to comment on what an absolutely stupid name this is for a storm but I’ve seen the next male storm name………..Eddie. I mean come on! Imagine being a storm and they call you “Dave” or “Eddie”. I’d cause extra hell on just for the fun of it.

Anyone back to the script Wes, Foursquare Penultimus. This represents the 30th releases in the ECS. As the title suggests it is the second last in the ECS. Why they didn’t got for a round 30 I’m not so sure. Though the gap between number 1 and number 2 was a good number of years.

First up its about the first ECS Series where I actually know what it means without having to consult Google, since they started with the fancy names. So there is a plus point for me.

As I am reviewing from a sample I have sourced the photos from wherever I could find one! Sadly no rear label shoots. I’ll correct this later. NB II think there is an issue with the photos on this review – I’ll try and fix it!!!!

Foursquare Penultimus Rum review by the fat rum pirateFoursquare Penultimus is a 15year old ex-Bourbon cask rum blended with a 10 year ex-Bourbon cask with a further  5 years ageing in ex-Moscatel cask (dual maturation). It has been bottled at 57%. This I have been told is going to be the new standard presentation strength moving forward with Limited Edition releases.

Although the ECS is finishing it does not mean Foursquare’s output will stagnate. There will be something new in Autumn. Foursquare have the better part of 50,0000 barrels maturing at Foursquare, So they certainly aren’t going to stop the aged limited editions. When released here in the UK it should retail at around the £100 mark I should imagine.

So lets get down to the fun part.

Straight away on the nose it’s doing a lot of the things you’d want it to. Plenty of that classic coconut and vanilla, a bit of sweetness. Then the Moscatel cask adding a slightly darker, fruitier edge. Nothing over the top more raisins and a bit of fig than anything fresh or jammy. It’s actually quite well judged.

On the palate it’s pretty much what you’d expect but in a good way. Nicely put together. You’ve got the usual caramel, vanilla, and oak combo. There’s a bit more depth here than your standard ex-bourbon offering.

The wine cask adds a slightly richer feel dried fruits, a touch of plum, maybe a bit of red grape skin and there’s a gentle spice running through it that keeps things interesting. It does lean a little towards the drier, oakier side but not to the point where it becomes hard work.

The 57% is noticeable but it’s well integrated. You can sip it neat without too much trouble, though it does open up a bit with a drop of water if you want to take the edge off and bring out a bit more of the fruit.

Foursquare Penultimus Rum review by the fat rum pirateFinish is very enjoyable. Fairly long, dries out nicely with lingering spice and oak, plus just enough of that Moscatel influence hanging around to remind you it’s there.

Overall, it’s difficult to pick fault with rum when it is made as well as this. This one maybe is not the most exciting or distinctive ECS release in terms of age or offering a new twist, but it’s hard to fault in terms of balance and drinkability. Which is how rum should be judged rather than on gimmicks, fancy marketing and faux history

The Moscatel cask is handled well this could have been very sweet. adding something without taking over. It feels like one of those bottles that’ll just quietly grow on you the more time you spend with it.

I will be ordering a bottle (or two) in due course without doubt!

 

Similar Posts

  • Diplomatico Single Vintage 2001

    Diplomatico Single Vintage 2001 rum review by the fat rum pirateA 2001 single vintage from Diplomatico who should need little or no introduction.  Their Diplomatico Reserva Exclusiva is regularly cited as one of the worlds greatest rums. For many rum lovers their rums are staples in their rum cabinets.

    Venezuela, has from has its own economic problems but the countries rums are globally recognised.  Brands such as Pampero are owned by Diageo.

    In Germany Diplomatico are prohibited from selling their brand as “Diplomatico”.   Due to a dispute with discount supermarket ALDI who market products with the Diplomat branding.  In Germany Diplomatico is known as Ron Botucal.  The name Botucal comes from the local indigenous word “Botuka”, meaning “Green Hill”. The reference is to the rolling hills of the national park.  Which is situated in front of the distillery and indicates Diplomatico’s/Botucal’s ties to the traditions of the area.

    On the brands own website and that of importer Speciality Brands much is made of the freshness of the sugar cane and the rolling countryside that the distillery is housed amongst.

    This 2001 vintage has been blended and aged for 12 years in bourbon barrels.  It is then finished for a further 12 months in Spanish Sherry Casks.  From Diplomatico’s marketing it seems this rum is rather special due to the “terroir” as well……

    “During this year, a number of factors contributed to rare conditions for sugar cane growth. High daily temperature variations, high humidity and lo.wer than average rainfall all contributed to one of the best sugar cane harvests ever seen”

    In the UK a bottle of this rum set you back around £80.  Considerably cheaper than the Ambassador.  Twice the price of the DRE.  The ABV is 43%. Following publication of this review I have been given some further information on this rum

    “The 1997 edition was the first to be made. It was according to DUSA made because that year had the perfect conditions for sugarcane and hence produced the best molasses. The barrels were marked accordingly and later used by Tito to create the Single Vintage.

    Following years (2000, 2001 and 2002) was based on the decision to release a vintage rum every year. DUSA uses two types of melasses – normal “molasses” and Sugar Cane Honey. They use the normal molasses for light rums (fermented for about 24 hours) primarily on their coloumn stills.

    The Sugar Cane Honey is used for the medium to heavy rums (fermented around 48 hours) and primarily on the batch kettle and pot stills.  Each resulting distilate is aged seperately until ready for blending ( light rums for teh shortest amount of time, though min. 2 years according to Venezuelan law).

    The blend of the Vintage series consists of 90% pot still and 10% kettle – this is apparently the same every year.  They sweeten their rums using a rum liqouor they also produce at DUSA called Hacienda Saruro.”

    Diplomatico Single Vintage 2001 rum review by the fat rum pirateAs to be expected from “Premium” rums such as this, the presentation is excellent.  You get a great decanter style glass bottle and a very stylish blue and grey box for storage.  The cork stopper is large and gives a very satisfying pop.  The stopper top is also very impressive and quite ornate.  No doubt some of your £80 is going towards this lavish presentation.  The box also gives us the Diplomatico marketing pzazz.  Sadly no information on what is actually in the bottle though.

    Fortunately for those who haven’t tried what is in the bottle.  I will now attempt to tell you exactly what lurks beneath all this fancy presentation.

    As you can probably make out from the photos the rum in glass is a pretty dark/reddish brown colour.  Slightly viscous but nowhere near as gloopy as Diplomatico Reserva Exclusiva (DRE).

    To review a Diplomatico product without mentioning the g/L of added sugar (or additives) would be a bit of a sacrilege for me.  When I dipped the Hydro it revealed an ABV of 38% which gives us likely added sugar (or other additives) of around 20 g/L.  This is slightly lower than the Ambassador and a lot lower than I have seen the DRE measured at.

    The nose is quite sweet but not overpoweringly so.  I’m getting brown sugar and some stoned fruits such as dark cherries.  A touch of cinnamon and surprisingly quite a lot of nice spiced oak and barrel ageing.

    Diplomatico Single Vintage 2001 rum review by the fat rum pirateSipping this Single Vintage rum is quite an interesting experience.  Initially its very sweet and you think it may overpower you with wave after wave of sugar.  It doesn’t.

    It leads into a spicy mid palate containing quite a lot of complexity.  Again the oak spice is there though it is slightly bitter, there are hints of raisin, all spice and an almost Christmas pudding like note, zesty orange and cinnamon.

    The most redeeming factor for this rum is the oak spiciness which stays right through the rum.  This makes it feel more like authentic rum than perhaps any of the other Diplomatico’s I have tried.  This is more in keeping with their Anejo.  The finish is long and spicy and quite more-ish.

    Having said all that its still a pretty sweet rum and will have as many detractors as it will fans.  The sugar has the usual rounding effect on the rum which has probably removed some of the “rough edges” but also  likely masks some of the more complex notes. Despite the sweetness it does at least still have some “rum” lurking beneath though

    I personally wouldn’t be chucking £80 for this anytime soon (it’s very handy having a rum friend who likes the opposite to what you buy) but it isn’t one of the worst “Premium” rums I have tasted.  Not by a long shot.

    It’s easy to drink and whilst on the sweet side not at all unpleasant apart from a slight bitterness in the middle of sipping.  Its markedly better than the Ambassador (for half the price).  However in the overall scheme of things I would still only rate this as slightly above average.  At the price I couldn’t really class it as being good.

    2.5 stars

  • Silver Seal Dennery Superior St Lucian Rum

    Silver Seal Dennery Superior St Lucian Rum Review by the fat rum piratSilver Seal Dennery Superior St Lucian Rum. The use of the “Dennery Distillery” on this bottling (and others) by Silver Seal has caused quite a lot of consternation from those currently involved at St Lucia Distillers.  Dennery is a completely different site to where the only St Lucian rum producer – St Lucia Distillers are now housed.

    The distillery hasn’t operated since around 1972 so that is why the current owners of St Lucia Distillers are a bit perplexed by the use of the name.  Maybe this rum is from around that period?

    At around £60 for a 70cl bottle with an ABV of 43% I very much doubt that.  There isn’t a great deal of information on this bottling.  It is believed to be from 1988/89.  Presentation wise – the label looks like something a small child has drawn.  It’s absolutely hideous.  I don’t know what it is with some indie bottlers but their presentation is stuck way back in the seventies for some reason.  To be fair Silver Seal have improved their presentation recently but some of it still looks dated.

    Unfortunately I’ve no information on the actual rum – whether it is Pot, Column or a blend etc.  So a lot of this I will try and guess at as we go through the tasting of this bottling.  As its bottled by Silver Seal I would guess most of the ageing has taken place in Scotland – not much Tropical Ageing.  It is estimated that this rum was bottled around 2012 so the rum is around 22 to 23 years old.

    I’m a big fan of St Lucia Distillers so I’ve been curious to try this rum for a long time.  So lets see how it went….

    Very dark in the glass almost mahogany.  Caramel? I would reckon.  If I’m right about the tropical ageing then this wouldn’t be so dark.  Maybe a charred barrel? Possibly

    Nose is pretty uninviting.  Almost sterile.  Little really to pick out just a bite of alcohol and a very woody bitterness. It doesn’t really say or do much.  Column distillation? I’d have to say so, yes. It offers little of what I expected.  There may be a few very faint notes but they are more odours than anything else.  Something old and a bit musty.

    No salt, brine, herb or touch of Jagermeister.  It’s almost neutral beyond woody bitterness. Lacks any real vanilla or cocoa to balance it like Admiral Rodney.  It’s just a bit boring.  A million miles away from the 1931 series.Silver Seal Dennery Superior St Lucian Rum Review by the fat rum pirat

    Sipped its got a bit of cocoa and a touch of caramel but it just tastes a bit old.  Any real flavour quickly disappears into woodiness and muskyness.  Muted, aged in barrels that have had their best days.  Maybe re-charred and just knackered.  Slightly murky and just a bit tired. Initially its quite fiery and peppered but it goes nowhere.  Just runs into a very boring fade of tired oak, faint caramel and a bitter almost sour note.  The finish is virtually non-existent bar the sour/bitter hit.

    One thing I never thought would that I would actually be bored by something coming out of St Lucia Distillers. I’ve seen them on Social Media question whether this is their product at all!  Which is a bit worrying.  Mind you, even the way Silver Seal presented this would make me want to distance myself from it.  That’s not counting the very average contents inside.

    A real disappointment for me.

  • Dictador Best of 1979 41.8% ABV

    Dictador Best of 1979 41.8% ABV Rum review by the fat rum pirateDictador Best of 1979 41.8% ABV. A rum almost as old as my good self. Just a year out from my date of birth. Dictador have released a number of these “Best of” rums over the past couple of years. All with quite a lot of ageing to them. On the surface at least.

    Dictador state that the “Best Of” series represent a selection from the best and oldest vintages from their collecfion. This collectionhas been developing for over 100 years – since the opening of their distillery in 1913.

    There have been a number of “Best of 1979” releases of varying casks, over the past few years. This is one of the most recent bottlings and should you find this particular rum. Which has been aged for 39 years and bottled sometime in 2018, it will set you back around £300 perhaps more. Original retail at the Master of Malt for this bottling was £310. Some of the 1979 series have been cheaper but weren’t as long aged. Though still aged for well over 30 years. It has been bottled at 41.8% ABV. Very exact. Other 1979 bottlings have been noted as being from single cask and have yielded approximately 300 bottles. I cannot find any specific information for this edition, sadly.

    I will be honest I only have a sample of this rum. I do not have the full bottle and I am struggling to find photos of the actual bottle. The handwritten labels don’t really help as I can’t quite decipher them. Anyway the photo above is roughly what it looks like.

    I’m not going to worry too much about it to be honest.

    Now whilst Dictador’s website states that the rum in the bottle, is all a full 39 years old – I have heard from some of their European contacts that not ALL the rum in the bottle is from 1979. It is actually a blend of older and younger rums. Again the website does note that some blending takes place but its not really specific.

    Dictador have spoken before of their distillery and using Pot Stills to produce the rum. I’m extremely skeptical about this as no-one has seen the distillery. It is believed by many that their rum is actually imported into Colombia from neighbouring Panama (or even possibly Costa Rica). Again Dictador bottlings do not state the rum is distilled by Hernan Parra – he is merely noted as the Master Blender. Their rums do not taste at all like Pot Still rum to me.

    It’s all a bit murky and along with the slightly strange profile of their rums Dictador are not a brand I care much for. Usually, their rums do not show additives as per the Hydrometer Test. This one actually does, showing around 15g/L of additives.

    Anyway without further ado. As I am without any reliable information I may as well crack on and let you know what the rum is like!

    In the glass we are presented with a very dark slightly viscous liquid.with a yellow/orange tinge around the edges.

    On the nose we are in familiar Dictador territory. Coffee – and quite a lot of it. Only this time there is a heavy saccharin aroma, when nosing the rum. So its like a perfumed Coffee Liqueuer. Toffee, caramel and dark chocolate are also present along with some raisin notes. It’s all nice but there’s not very much oak and spice as a result of prolonged ageing evident.

    Unfortunately the synthetic nature of this rums sweetness, is not very appealing to me. The notes above may seem pretty “classic” but believe me – they aren’t.

    Sipping Dictador Best of 1979, isn’t anymore pleasant than the nose. The sweetness is less pronounced but it just tastes like young cheap alcohol mixed with some sugar syrup and some kind of coffee flavouring. It’s thin and slightly bitter – the oak spice what little there is just harsh and bitter. No balance to this rum it’s just a bit of a mess.

    It’s thin and everything about it is very short. There is no real development beyond the initltial sweet confection. Maybe some bitter woody notes as mentioned but that’s it. The finish? There’s nothing there really . You sip it and it quickly just disappears. A slight alcohol burn but nothing much else.

    The mouthfeel is so thin, it reminds me of a flavoured vodka. It’s kind of a bit like a Rum Drambuie. I don’t think anyone would pick this out as being a rum – unless they are familiar with Dictador.

    This is really poor if we are being honest. It’s not a good example of a Spanish Style Ron.

     

     

  • The Duppy Share Caribbean Rum

    The Duppy Share Caribbean Rum review by the fat rum pirateThe Duppies are Caribbean spirits who steal Caribbean rum hopping from island to island, keeping the best for themselves.

    The Duppy Share is named after this fairy story (or the story was made for the rum I’m not sure).  It’s a twist on the Angel’s Share tale. I was initially pretty disinterested in trying this rum which was released just last year.  I read the press release and gave a little groan.  Rums blended from different sources don’t really grab my attention and I don’t tend to buy my rum based on fairy tales….. However, fair play to the team behind The Duppy Share they have certainly produced a very attractive website.  Their marketing team is also doing something right because the rum is available in a number of premium Department Stores in the UK.

    The Duppy Share has a very strong brand identity, which as you can see is carried through from bottle to the website and all of their other marketing online.  For such a small operation they have certainly done very well with their product.  The company are trading as Westbourne Drinks Co so I am expecting some more spirits in the portfolio soon. The team of George Frost, Jessica Swinfen and Rosie Little clearly know a thing or two about rum as well.  The Duppy Share is a mix of 3 year old Jamaican Pot Still rum and a 5 year old Bajan rum.  The rums are sourced from the Worthy Park Estate in Jamaica, (who are most famous for their Rum Bar Overproof Rum) and Foursquare distillery supply the 5 year old Bajan. The issue I have with rums blended from differing islands/locations is that they often The Duppy Share rum review by the fat rum piratetend to be cheaper blends.  Often they are to be found on Supermarket shelves.  Pusser’s aside I cannot think of many “blended” rums that I would rate as classics.

    The Duppy Share is available in the UK at around the £25-30 mark.  The uniquely shaped bottle is 70cl and the spirit is bottled at 40% ABV. As mentioned already the presentation is really top notch and the beautiful rounded stubby bottle really stands out on the shelf.  It is “trendy” and whilst many may bemoan this it is a new rum so it has every right to look modern.  The label also gives the tale regarding the Duppies.  I like the colourful vibrant packaging and I only hope the liquid contained within has a similar vibrancy.  Lovely plastic topped cork stopper as well.

    I finally tried this rum at a friends house mixed with cola.  I have recently been enjoying a good few Jamaican rums and the Jamaican element of this really struck me on my first glass.  The smoothness of the drink also impressed me.  Impressed with the rum I decided to make it part of my next rum consignment.

    In the glass The Duppy Share presents itself as a lovely classic golden brown colour.  The nose is rich and fruity.  Classic pungent Jamaican notes such as Banana and Pineapple combine with sweet brown sugar notes.  The nose is sweet but carries just enough of the Jamaican “funk” to make it interesting.  The Bajan rum in the blend seems to be lost in the mix.  However, I don’t think the Bajan rum is in the blend to be the predominant nose and flavour. What the blenders at The Duppy Share have grasped is that good rum does not have to be aged excessively.

    The website gives obvious clues that they see this rum as a high quality mixing rum, rather than a sipper.  However, they have deliberately chosen a 5 year old Bajan rum to mute the younger Jamaican rum and smooth out the rums profile. The Duppy Share rum review by the fat rum pirateThe rum can be sipped and is very pleasant that way.  In many ways it reminds me of the carefully blended rums from the Appleton Estate.  The 8 Year Old Reserve in particular.  The Jamaican rum provides the flavour and the Bajan provides the smoothness to balance out the rough edges of the young Jamaican rum.

    It was with Cola that I first enjoyed The Duppy and it is at this stage of the review that this already very good rum moves up another notch.  It’s fantastic.  I’m not hugely bothered about rums being smooth, but this rum is the very epitomy of easy drinking.  It slips down beautifully.  Often this is to the detriment of flavour.  Many producers go for smoothness over all else.  Many reviewers opt for age and smoothness as signs of greatness.  This rum is not aged particularly long but is super smooth.  It is also very tasty! The Bajan rum smooth’s out the drink and adds balance the Jamaican provides big bold rich flavours.

    This is a really great mixing rum and evidence yet again that in the £25-30 price range there are a number of fine rums which are as good as any of the Premium and Super Premium rums with price tags north of £50. A real touch of class and a great rum that is blended in the UK.  Well done Westbourne Drinks!  This is great stuff.

    4 stars

  • Dead Man’s Fingers – Spiced Rum

    dead-mans-fingers-rum-3Dead Man’s Fingers is a Spiced Rum.  First released in 2015 by The Rum and Crab Shack, St Ives, Cornwall.  Initially the rum was only available in the bar/restaurant (which has since expanded to another branch in Exeter).  It is now pushing for a national release and is already available from a number of UK online retailers.

    Dead Man’s Fingers can relate to a number of “things” in the natural world such as coral and seaweed.  In this instance its a homage to the amount of Crab sold at the Crab Shack.  Dead Man’s Fingers can refer to Crab’s gills.

    As you might guess from the leading photograph they have focused upon strong branding and you can already purchase branded T-Shirts and other merchandise online.  Sailor Jerry has built its success on a strong brand identity and as was evidenced at the recent UK Rumfest in London Dead Man’s Fingers also know how to get a buzz going surrounding their product.  Their stand was very popular and their representatives very helpful and very fun.  Their website whilst brief also keeps up the presentation and branding

    The rum is noted as “small batch” this is likely more down to the overall production of the spiced rum as a whole rather than the distilled product at the base of this rum.  A 70cl bottle of Dead Man’s Fingers will set you back around £25 it clocks in at 37.5% ABV.  The rum comes in a standard bar bottle with a metal screw cap.

    In the glass Dead Man’s Fingers is a typical Spiced/Gold Rum colour.  Nice golden/reddish brown.  A kind of standard “rum” colour which many producers seem to adopt.

    It doesn’t cling to the glass when swirled and but you do get a good nose of spices before you even start nosing properly.

    Dead Man's Fingers Spiced Rum Review by the fat rum pirateWhich is a slight concern.  On the nose I’m initially struck by a very familiar smell.  Vanilla and I’m getting waft after waft of it.  Reminiscent of old style UK Sailor Jerry, Old J Spiced, RedLeg and even Rumbullion. My initial thoughts are not that profile all over again………..sweet vanilla and caramel.

    It’s not that I don’t like Vanilla nor do I have aversion to it per se.  It’s just that with years of trying Spiced Rums and reviewing a good number it becomes a little predictable and safe.  Personally, I see little point in producing something so similar to a number of brands already out there.

    It’s not all vanilla but the other notes are equally safe and equally popular.  Cinnamon, citrus peel and some very sweet caramel.  If you like this kind of thing or aren’t bored of it- great.  Unfortunately I’m left non-plussed up to now.

    I’ll try sipping to start with. I fully expect to mix though and any half decent spiced rum should make a decent rum and coke!

    dead-mans-fingers-rum-2Sipping offers my first real surprise.  It is nowhere near as sweet as the nose implies.  In actual fact the orange peel/marmalade notes really shine through.  It’s reasonably complex – some nice more natural tasting notes of cinnamon, brown sugar and a little saffron spice.  The vanilla has become much more muted, having all but disappeared. If you wanted an after dinner drink this wouldn’t be terrible with a chunk of ice and a squeeze of lime (or maybe orange?).

    Mixing with a little cola again it works.  The cola also tempers the nose down a notch or two.  There’s a nice balance to this and a nice mix of spices working in the mix.  I couldn’t drink a lot of this though.  It is still quite big on the sicklier caramel/brown sugar notes but its nowhere near as full on as the likes of the atrocious Old J Spiced Gold. 

    It’s not the best spiced rum I have ever had but its far from the worst.  Slightly above average and at £25 probably well worth a punt if you are a bit of Spiced rum fan.  I’d arguably choose a bottle of this over Sailor Jerrys if I had to buy one of them again.

     

     

     

     

  • M&S – Bajan Estate Rum XO

    M&S Bajan RumI had seen this rum on sale in M&S and came close to buying a bottle for £19. In the end I was persuaded that I didn’t need it by my wife (who had bought me it for Christmas). The rum usually retails at £22 for a 70cl bottle. As Marks and Spencer have recently begun stocking “brand name” goods I was slightly surprised to see the additions to their rum range were own brand offerings. Supermarket rum is not something which excites me, its cheaper than entry level branded rum and this is usually reflected in both taste and appearance. However, M&S is no ordinary supermarket and indeed this may well be no ordinary rum. Apologies to anyone with Albatross now running through their head…………

    In the past I’ve uncovered that a Sainsburys Vintage Cider was very possibly a well known Hertfordshire cider, albeit at half the price and a bottle twice the size. Lacking all the rums of Barbados to taste test I began my investigation with the label. The XO has no age statement. The biggest give away is that the rum is finished in brandy/cognac casks. This points to the fact that the rum is likely to come from a plantation with links to Cognac Ferrand. Unfortunately, this doesn’t really cut the field down as they use a number of distilleries for their Plantation range of rums. On the M&S website (see link) the “rummaster” seems to think that the rum is aged between 8-10 years and from the Foursquare distillery. I’m not convinced the rum is that old to be honest. R Seale’s 10 year old is £30 plus so to me the maths just doesn’t work.

    I’ve actually spoken with Plantation since I originally wrote this review and they have confirmed that the M&S Guatemalan is the same as their Guatemalan Gran Anejo (albeit it a reduced ABV).  As far as this rum is concerned the only information I could get was that it was “closely related” to the Plantation Barbados 5 Year Old.  I haven’t had a bottle of the Plantation 5 Year old for a long time so I cannot at present do a comparison.

    As the picture shows the rum is presented in a medium sized bottle which is quite stylish. The gaudy yellow label spoils the overall look IMO (see the M&S Guatemalan review for a better designed, more tasteful label). The closure is a screw top but its not a bog standard metallic screw top and it looks pretty cool.

    The rum itself is a rich golden colour with a sweet but not overpowering smell, unlike for example a Jamaican style rum.  M&S Bajan rum retails at £22 a bottle and is good value at that price. It is a thoroughly enjoyable mixing rum. It’s great with cola and would compliment a rum punch and most cocktails.   You can tell it is aged in a tropical climate, the rum tastes sweet and fruity without much oakiness or spicyness. As a sipping rum I think you need to be looking in another price bracket for something more complex. It’s smooth but I wouldn’t class it as a sipper. If I had around £20-25 to spend on a bottle of rum and I was looking for a Bajan style rum then I would opt for this or Doorly’s. I’ve tried the Plantation Barbados 5 year old and I found it too vanilla-ey for my tastes, overly sweet, almost a spiced rum. If you are new to Bajan style then get yourself to Tesco and try the Cockspur 5 star, if you enjoy that then you might wish to try a more expensive variant. For those who are familiar with Bajan rum’s then I can recommend the Cockspur 12 or R Seale’s 10 Year Old or Rum Sixty Six as a more expensive indulgence at around £30-35 per bottle.

    3 stars